Re: Not very clever
[QUOTE]Is that the guy on "The Godfather"?[/QUOTE]
Nah, he played Gandulf in the last Star Trek film.
483 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jul 2013
I'm going to give an anecdote from when I was working at the MoD to show the kind of mindset you are dealing with when you deal with senior members of it.
The branch I was contracting for had recently (six months ago) finished rolling out a brand new email system (Groupwise for anyone who cares) and I got dragged into the office of a senior member who proceeded to give me a lecture on how this system was rubbish and didn't work.
I asked her what exactly wasn't working properly and was told that it was missing all sorts of people. Huh? So I asked for a demonstration. She proceeded to create a new email. "This is for Tom Watson* " I was told. She then clicked on the address book and started to scroll downwards through all the A's, the B's, the C's etc. towards W. Keep in mind that this was rather a large (some might even say massively overstaffed) organisation. Eventually - very eventually - we reached the WA's and sure enough there was no Tom Watson.
I asked, why don't you just search for him and clicked on the search field then typed Tom W which sure enough came up with Tom Whatson - the correct spelling of his name no less.
THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS I was told most firmly before being told to go away and fix it.
*Not the actual name which has been forgotten with time and therapy but close enough for government work.
When I first saw the NBN announcement and how it was to be structured I wondered "gosh that is a really bad setup, how could things be worse". Then I saw what was done when the Liberal party came to power and realised that - yes things could be even worse.
Frankly Australia your telecommunications sector is a f******g disgrace. If I could just sit smugly over in Auckland and laugh then I wouldn't care but my role requires that I regularly source new network connections for the company in places throughout Australia - and that is a nightmare.
I'm being offered 2MB fibre for the same price as I pay for 100MB business grade fibre in NZ - and that only where it is available. Some places there is neither NBN fibre nor any spare capacity for DSL (I am looking at you Pacific Fair).
If you are an Australian citizen you should be looking for suitable lamp-posts and gathering rope and rounding up telco executives. It seems like nothing else will solve this.
As a FAL holder, the worst cops to deal with around here are the ex-British ones. They really don't get it that firearms laws here are different and that "because I feel like it" isn't a valid reason to stop something. Unfortunately we seem to have gotten the ones that are very good at climbing the ladder/floating to the top.
The legend at Brutish Rail when I worked there was of the UPS's at King's Cross station that had been (accidentally?) wired to the same feed as the trains used. So every two minutes there was a massive line drop and then an equally massive surge as another train braked coming in. Needless to say batteries in said UPS's lasted a matter of weeks.
Experienced it in a smaller way when I supported a client right next door to a steel works that had voltage going anywhere from 150 to 260 during the course of an hour as steel was poured. Not helped by the client also running some pretty high instant draw machinery themselves.
Nope, you need to do pretty much almost the same level of maintenance as you would an operational ship if you want it to be available in any reasonable length of time. The main cost benefits are not needing a full crew, nor much in the way of fuel oil/food.
Electronic dohickeys have a service life and have to be replaced regularly. Oils swapped. Shafts lubed (oooh err madam), hulls scraped and painted, systems tested. If you are going to regularly test the engines then the boilers need cleaning.
You can smother it all in preserving grease, but then you have weeks of cleaning gloop off, relubricating, testing etc. And still need to do the hull scraping/cleaning/repainting regardless.
Not the kind of thing that lends itself to an immediate response to a threat.
The need to keep a large fleet in reserve was what crippled the Royal Navy post WW2. There were large fleets of escorts and minesweepers (plus more than a few Battleships and Cruisers) anchored in a great many rivers and harbours around the UK post war, ready to be reactivated when war broke out with the USSR (expected to happen by 1955).
They all needed a certain amount of maintenance (and hence manpower) at a time when both were in short supply.
Meanwhile most of the RN's fleet carriers were unable to be used from manpower shortages - not that this mattered much as the Fleet Air Arm was down to less than 150 aircraft after all the Lend-Lease American stuff was pushed overboard to avoid paying for it.
Can someone, anyone, who comments on here please tell me of anyone they know who's political opinion has been changed by advertising? Really?
When was the last time you convinced someone to change their POV on the internet? Ever.
There is a delusion that 'everyone else is a weak minded sheep, easily swayed by the last bright colour they saw with a slogan on it'. Which is amusing in its own way - shared as it is by everyone else.
Monty's ego and desire to be "first over the Rhine" caused him to completely ignore the advice from the Admiralty that Antwerp was utterly useless unless he also took the approaches. Instead of ordering them captured from the very weak German forces at the time, he had them charge hell for leather towards the German border. The Germans recognised this and reinforced the approaches and it took months to capture them.
Meanwhile, Antwerp was useless even though it had been captured with the docks intact. The allied forces were on the end of a very long supply line from Normandy via trucks and as a result were out of fuel and munitions and stuck on the German border. Antwerp operating would have meant one of the biggest ports in Europe could be used to deliver munitions etc. to forces faster and in much greater volume.
This two month delay in getting Antwerp opened gave the Germans time enough to reorganise their forces (hence the victory in Market Garden) and allowed them enough time to kick off the Battle of the Bulge.
All in all, not the mark of the "strategic genius" that Monty liked to parade himself as. Indeed most of his "genius" can be attributed to him taking over the Eighth Army at the time when Bletchley Park had started having a great deal more success in cracking Enigma. Post war his time as Chief of Imperial Staff showed up just how out of depth he was.
Civil servants have just as many reasons to lie, obfuscate, exaggerate and generally mis-describe situations to their own advantage as their political "masters" do.
I trust the words of none of them.
(Confession - Grumpy was one for 10 years which is how he knows these things).
Buzzzz. WRONG. They ruled on body corporate status and the rights pertaining thereto. That's not just corporations, it's ANY group of people acting in concert. So it includes trade-unions, Greenpeace, political parties, the New York Times, the NRA, PETA themselves, sports clubs and 'teh evil corpratshuns'.
And they ruled that just because you are acting as a group you don't lose your protections and rights. Unless you think that the police should be able to tap trade-unions phone lines at will because they have no rights , that the taxman should be able to seize anything they want without recourse from your football club or the White House should be able to force the NYT to run favourable stories because freedom of expression doesn't apply to companies. In which case I can't help you.
Microsoft already had their Photobucket level of Derp incident about two years back when they decided arbitrarily that "no-one could possibly want a link that lasted more than 24 hours" which meant that any new links would rapidly die. There was a fair amount of outcry about it and six months later they introduced an embedding option within OneDrive.
Gave up on them a couple of years back. They used to have a tool that let you see who was linking to your images and which images were the most popular. Then they "upgraded" to support ... I dunno, sepia tones or something. And killed the tool. Simultaneously it became suspiciously easy to run out of free bandwidth.
Swapped over to using OneDrive and have never looked back, until today. Just to crown things, one of their ads tried to serve me some malware when I logged in to delete my account.
Maybe. But my money is on he's just an idiot.
Lobbying is done by people representing all kinds of views and interests. Greenpeace, unions, corporations, lawyers - everyone and everything.
The here problem appears to be a (deliberate?) misunderstanding of the word "corporation". Corporation means any group of people acting in concert. So yes, that covers the likes of Greenpeace. And General Electric. And Planned Parenthood. And the NRA. And the New York Times. Because it is recognised that people working together are stronger than any one individual.
But noooo. Instead we get the wet dream "If only we could ban lobbying. Then only my favourite groups would be allowed to exert any political pressure".
"Wow, nice software son. It sure would be a shame if the IRS decided to audit you every year for eternity from now on. And if the EPA took an interest. And if the FCC decided it was worth investigating in case it was 'commerce'. Yep, sure would be a shame. If only there was a way that sort of thing didn't happen. Right?"
I look forward to fans of Freedom like Saudi Arabia, Burma and Venezuela being appointed to Ms. Merkel's international regulatory body. Just like the recent appointment of Saudi to the UN Women's Rights Commission, this can only be good for the internet.
Having a degree in Physics doesn't stop you from being a complete 'tard about other things clearly.
I've had dealings with ATO's software support people for their incredibly crappy portal. If the rest of it is run like the software support people (hours of support 09:30 - 16:00 except Wednesdays when it's 10:30 - 16:00) then it leaves me completely unsurprised that this is happening.
The next big increase in office productivity will come when companies realise that pretty much any role with Digital, Sustainable, Gender, or Communications in the title can be nixed without the slightest impact on company performance. (Anything with Bicycle in the description unless you are working for Avanti, Yeti or a Tour de France group too).
She was found to have been "extremely careless with classified information". Which is code speak for "if anyone else had done it they'd be in jail".
As I may have mentioned in another thread on this, I previously worked on British MoD email servers, had TS clearance and was subject to the Official Secrets Act. If I'd done even 50% of what was done with her email I'd still be in jail being traded for a handful of cigarettes (on account of being so pretty).
Buzz: Wrong!
The "Popular" vote was for "None of these bozos" which over 80 million eligible American voters went for and didn't vote at all. Next on the list was "anyone but Clinton*". At best she got third.
* Taken as when you position yourself and the chosen one, she who has been anointed and so forth, everyone who votes otherwise clearly is against you regardless of whether they went for Trump, Johnson, Stein or others.
Sort of. Remember the sea is very big and even a carrier task force is quite small compared to that. What all those missile boats need is targeting information. And it's very hard to get such information when your enemy has air dominance and can knock down your recon drones/aircraft before they can supply such data.
While most modern missiles can simply be fired down a vector with the hope that the onboard radar will pick something up, that is a rather poor method of engagement with a much lower chance of a successful strike.
On the one hand, it's an impressive testimonial to China's shipbuilding industry.
But on the other it's a copy of a flawed design - they could at least have improved it, got rid of the ski ramp and put in a catapult. Yes I am aware that for a steam catapult they'd have needed a different power design. But the Royal Navy ran cordite powered catapults for many years on their older carriers which worked perfectly well - i.e. using a charge of slower burning gunpowder to drive the catapult.
Instead what they appear to have created is a copy of the Kuznetsov only with working toilets and on-board WiFi.
One such ship (the Liaoning) can be justified on the grounds of "we are training on how to run a carrier", but two such flawed designs is a bit silly.
Ah yes. The "I don't own a gun, never would and don't see any reason why someone would" person who likes to tell firearms owners just how things should - nay must - be.
And while we are at it, the head of Marketing doesn't see why we need any of that firewall or anti-virus rubbish that just slows things down and he's an expert because he has an iPad and uses Facebook.
And a reminder. Prior to both Hungerford and Dunblain the local firearms community had told plod that they were very concerned about the people involved and didn't think they were suitable for a firearms license. Plod of course did... nothing.