Dunno about you, but when I tried just throwing a WAP into the middle of a road, it didn't provide me with any wireless. I ended up having to attach it to a pole, provide it with electricity and an ethernet connection to the internet. Which might have some costs associated with it like labour/permits/materials. Just saying.
447 posts • joined 21 Jul 2013
Uncle Sam's nuke-stockpile-simulating souped-super El Capitan set to hit TWO exa-FLOPS, take crown as world's fastest machine in 2023
***The argument is that drugs are expensive to create, so they need to be priced high to recoup the cost. Well, some free time on the world's biggest supercomputer (x600) should knock off a bunch of development costs.***
The biggest chunk of costs are getting FDA approval - something that can take up to 10 years. No amount of super/ultra/mega-computing time will cut that type of paperwork.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to save data from a computer that should have died aeons ago
Re: Federally protected
They're not protected in NZ, they're a major pest - you can hunt them any time of the year using any method. They're also smart enough that they're bloody hard to do pest control on. They're big enough that shotgun rounds designed for ducks are shrugged off, and cunning enough to not let people get close enough to use larger rounds. The best bag I ever got required sitting with a supressed rifle on a hill more than 200 meters away from the pond - I got just two. The remaining 30 or so took flight.
Any Canadian goose dinners we get are well earned and have required teamwork, a good dog and more than a little luck.
You know the President is able to shut down all US comms, yeah? An FCC commish wants to stop him from doing that
This post has been deleted by a moderator
Re: Another interesting article
The Canadian fighter was the Avro (Canada) Arrow. Which was a potentially very good interceptor for shooting down Russian bombers that had the misfortune to enter testing at the moment that the USSR demonstrated Sputnik - showing that bombers were no longer the primary threat to be concerned with.
We need to make it even easier for UK terror cops to rummage about in folks' phones, says govt lawyer
It's critically important that your local council can demand that you unlock your phone so that they can prove it was you who was walking your dog nearby when the highly trained nose of the nearby parking warden smelled s*** (don't ask about how they're trained, it involves senior council management, a tonsilectomy, a rabbit shaped jelly mould and a corgi called Dai).
Apple calls BS on FBI, AG: We're totally not dragging our feet in murder probe iPhone decryption. PS: No backdoors
FIB strikes again
The FIB has a long history of lying about this. They claimed at once stage they had over 8,000 locked phones that were preventing crimes from being solves. The actual number turned out to be about 10% of that - none of it terrorist related, almost entirely down to the "highly sucessful" war on drugs.
It's pretty safe to run on the assumption that when the head of the FIB says something, it's a lie.
The Register disappears up its own fundament with a Y2K prank to make a BOFH's grinchy heart swell with pride
Re: Bloody Shambles
Don't know why you got downvoted. Leigh-Mallory should have been awarded the Iron Cross for his services to Germany while in charge of Fighter Command. The Middle and Far East were crying out for good aircraft and crew while he was wasting them in pointless sweeps.
That being said, when Spitfire pilots did first clash with Zero's, they got the same bloodied nose as everyone else who tried to dogfight with a Zero.
Re: "I could walk in and take the whole lot this afternoon"
Interesting - especially as the "nothing East of Suez" dated long before Thatcher - back to the 1960's and was used to justify the end of the RN's carrier fleet. And was exactly the reason why there wasn't any significant RN presence in HK.
Then you have the small fact of the treaty that had only a 99 year lease on most of Hong Kong. The UK could have ignored/broke it. All that would do is demonstrate an utter lack of respect for treaties. There is no possible way that could rebound right?
I think you are perhaps misremembering things.
Not quite. Aircraft carriers were part of the 5:5:3: ratio. They were also limited to 8" guns just in case anyone decided to build disguised heavy cruisers. It turned out that 8" gunfire and aircraft are not a happy mix and most such carriers never fired their 8" guns in anger. Only the Japanese and USN even bothered to fit such weapons - probably on the principle that the most likely foe for an aircraft carrier in the Pacific was an enemy cruiser.
Re: Bloody Shambles
Singapore was a mixed of a military and a civilian screw up.
For example the military wanted to employ a whole lot more dock workers to get goods off supply ships as quickly as possible when they arrived. The Governor General of Malaya was opposed as it would almost certainly raise the wages of the people working in the rubber plantations and tin mines - the owners of which were his golfing chums. The result - a number of freighters loaded with urgently needed supplies were sunk at their berth, still unloaded.
On the other hand the military was also being run on a peacetime basis, even after the Japanese attacked. A story is told of an Australian unit that tried to get mines and barbed wire to help protect the shore they were guarding. A unit was sent to the supply depot to get some - it was closed because it was Saturday.
It was not the Empire's finest moment. The US at least could point to Bataan holding out until April - exactly what it was supposed to do under the old War Plan Orange. Singapore, "the Gibraltar of the Far East" lasted a week.
It wasn't the Kido Butai that the PoW and Repulse were up against, but land based naval bombers.
I do totally agree that had pretty much any force in the RN at the time come up against the Kido Butai they'd have come off second (if not third) best. The RN's carriers could probably have survived a dive bombing attack, but the IJN's torpedo bombers and torpedoes were top notch and very few ships survive multiple torpedo strikes.
I've just been re-reading Bloody Shambles, a history of the air war in SE Asia during 1941 and 1942.
The RN had realised a year back that only a minimum of three battleships, a carrier, three heavy cruisers and at least ten destroyers would represent a serious and viable task force against the Japanese. However almost none of that was available at the time, and those that were, were not necessarily the best choices for the role.
For example HMS Prince of Wales had been designed from the start for service in European waters. Her cooling was entirely inadequate for tropical service and among the first things to break from the heat were her radar systems. HMS Repulse on the other hand was designed to serve anywhere in the British empire - conditions onboard her were significantly more comfortable than on PoW. When other ships of the KGV class were sent to the Pacific in 1944, they were first given a major upgrade of air conditioning systems (and a nice "harmless" protective layer of asbestos).
The RAF had offered to have a CAP of 6 Buffalo aircraft overhead during daylight hours at all times. This was turned down by Admiral Philips because he was a desk jocky with zero recent experience of ship operations and didn't understand the need for top cover. He probably would have done equally poorly had a carrier been available. Even just 6 fighters could have caused a lot of havok with the unescorted Japanese torpedo bombers.
Finally the IJN pilots of the time were first class while the training of the RAF pilots in the region ... left a lot to be desired. (For example there was almost no aerial gunnery training as it wore out the guns and required more maintenance than was available).
Death and taxes and human stupidity
Transfer pricing is what enables my IT team's work to be charged to our Australian subsidiary where 90% of the support is needed. If that wasn't the case, the CFO would be demanding that we relocate to Australia - a fate worse than death.
It's not some kind of unmitigated evil - it's a normal accounting practise, especially where services are spread over multiple countries. The devil as always is in the details.
Meanwhile also in NZ, a combination of Police and SAP incompetence resulted in personal details of all firearms license holders being made available to any dealer who logged into the system - rumour has it that it wasn't just dealers either, but any bozo. Thanks very much Plod & SAP for handing out a shopping list to the local crims.
Re: So if you ever wonder why Germany and Japan became so strong economically thats why
***Even during the war, the German economy never really went onto a war footing - mostly because they couldn't afford to - all the resources that they gained by invading other countries (including slave labour) didn't make up for the fact that they were living way, way beyond their means.***
The big problem they had was that there just weren't enough resources to go around - especially with steel and the coal you need to make it. So in 1940 a large percentage of the steel had to be diverted to ammunition making as they were running very low on it. Meanwhile aircraft and vehicle production suffer. The next year ammuniton was plentiful for the invasion of the USSR, but it was only by looting the crap out of France and other occupied nations that they could get sufficient vehicles to even attempt to invade. (And of course having 600+ different designs of vehicles in service was a really bad idea when it came time to logistically support such a vehicle fleet in the field).
Of course stealing all of France's trucks, cars, trains and coal meant that the French were no longer able to make and supply steel so instead of adding to Germany's overall power the French were a drain. And this was a pattern repeated in the other occupied states - a crippling of the state for a short term gain followed by a long term liability in which slave labour became the only thing they were good for supplying.
Germany did end up hitting it's peak possible performance in 1943 as far as production was concerned - every available man was in the armed forces or production, and there was effectively no civil economy. By that stage they'd given up any pretence that they could keep their economy under control - inflation rose massively while living standards plumetted. It was all to be sacrificed in the name of the Gotterdamerung on the Eastern Front.
Re: So if you ever wonder why Germany and Japan became so strong economically thats why
***Well, when WW2 started Germany was also very strong so the excuse of "free American money" (which wasn't really free) doesn't really cut it.***
Germany was very definitely NOT economically strong at the start of WW2. It was barely being kept afloat by the looting of the Austrian and Czech treasuries and a great deal of financial shenanigans.
There is a very good book called "The Wages of Destruction" by Adam Tooze that goes into the pre-war (and wartime) German economy and how they were (barely) able to to pay for rearmament and what this meant for the average German worker (hint - poverty, especially compared to the likes of a British worker).
***TSR2 - a world leading design that was cancelled...***
On the one hand the TSR2 was indeed a world leading design. On the other it was very much a bleeding edge design with all that implies for costs and development time. At the time of cancellation it still had massive issues to overcome, some of which they weren't even sure if they could be overcome. An endless financial black hole is not something the governments of the day could look upon with calm soothing thoughts. Especially when the F-111 was being developed with American money and at American risk.
Yes if there is one thing governments are good for it's protecting our privacy. Well obviously not everyones privacy. In fact not anyones privacy.
In fact they're notoriously shit at it, and unlike Google or Facebook have been known to send the odd drone or special operations teams to kill people when they get things wrong (or right).
Asking the government to safeguard our privacy is like asking a bunch of foxes what kind of protection chickens need.
Judge shoots down Trump admin's efforts to allow folks to post shoddy 3D printer gun blueprints online
Re: More guns = safer for everyone
Here's a nice 3 seconds of googling from 2017.
Here's the muppet shooting his own police station.
Local police firearms training consists of 35 shots a year from their Glock's and a single magazine from their AR's at targets "as far away" as 35 meters.
Of course when you shoot yourself in the bum, that's a sign of competency, not that you should be charged with a crime.
Re: More guns = safer for everyone
Or a place where local youfs favourite activity is playing "stab the stranger". Or places where the penalty for being an infidel is to have your concerts exploded or shot up. Or a place where "rape the westerner, they're all asking for it" is a common weekend activity. And so forth.
Or for that matter, living in a place where the local cops are a lot better at shooting themselves in the foot or bum, or shooting the police station or their own car than they are at hitting an actual threat (which I do).
The Glock 17 was the Liberator of its time. "Undetectable" even though it had large amounts of metal.
"That punk pulled a Glock 9 on me. You know what that is? It's a porcelain gun made in Germany. It doesn't show up on your airport X-ray machines here and it costs more than what you make in a month!"
Which is at least 4 lies for the price of one.
Judge Canut was it?
Issues order that the tides may not come in - aka that things posted on the internet must vanish.
The LIberator is a piece of plastic crap. I am however aware of people using metal sintering 3D printers to produce far stronger and more useful components - something the NZ government has decided to acknowledge by putting it's fingers in it's ears and chanting "la la la la, I can't hear you, our arms confiscation program is 100% successful".
NSA to Congress: Our spy programs don’t work, aren’t used, or have gone wrong – now can you permanently reauthorize them?
Re: The United Scaredycats of America
When you want a hammer that doesn't EVER generate sparks when you're using it to adjust a fuze in an environment full of gunpower. When you want a toilet seat that goes into an airplane that doesn't put out toxic smoke in the event of it catching fire or shatter into razor sharp fragments.
Like most things designed for specialised environments where the product run is short, the costs per item are high.
There are many many things you can criticise various militaries for spending and/or wasting their money on - spending money to make things safer for their solders, sailors and airmen is not one of them.
Re: Where were you 20 years ago?
1999? Contracting for the British MoD rolling out ***DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS*** on a ***DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS*** platform.
The best bits were the ***DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS***, but that sure didn't compensate for ***DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS*** and the worst of it was that my line manager was ***DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS*** and Welsh.
Looking back on it, I can only shake my head and ***DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS***.
The Feds are building an America-wide face surveillance system – and we're going to court to prove it, says ACLU
FIB hard at work again
Hey kids, remember when the FIB were the defenders of democracy and justice because they investigated the Trump that one time.
Wait, oh yeah, they never were. They only just admitted to abusing the NSA's surveillence systems, using it thousands of times a day. This means they can totally be trusted with this system to never abuse it because they learned their lessons from the last time right?
The FIB have repeatedly shown themselves as scum. They're hated by the rest of US law enforcement as the guys who "show up after all the work has been done to claim the credit". They only existed because in 1920's it was too hard to co-ordinate between local, state and federal agencies - that time has long since past. Got to be time to think about breaking them up and shuffling their brave defenders of justice off to any agency that would take them.
Is HONK nothing sacred HONK? It's 2019 and an evil save file can pwn much-loved HONK Untitled Goose Game
Re: Pedant alert
Green actually means 'You may proceed if it is safe to do so'**
Nope I'm pretty sure it means "look up from your f***ing phone which you've been checking Faecesbook and messaging about that wicked parti after everyone behind you starts honking the horn because it's been green for 5 seconds FFS and slowly progress forward leaving just enough time for one more person to get through safely".
Re: This sounds a lot like...
Or raided by a poorly trained SWAT team who will shoot you (and your family and your dog) for "resisting arrest" when you react to a 3:00am door smash in.
Never seen Facebook (or Amazon/Google/et.Al.) manage to do that, seen law enforcement do it on a regular basis.
I'm told by someone who should know that a 3PL hired at the time to shift spares to the Middle East managed to store the spare tank barrels for the Challengers on a diagional upright angle "as it's the only way they'll fit in a 20FT container". Needless to say, the warping involved meant that there were no spare barrels at all - which is not a good state of affairs when you're expecting The Mother of All Battles.
I have a Sunbeam kettle (and toaster - thye were part of a package deal). I gather the name derives from the fact that it would be faster to heat your water by leaving your cup of water in a sunbeam than to try to boil it in this sad pathetic excuse for a kettle. The toaster is no better.
Re: harmonising the guns
The quote from some of the better pilots during the Battle of Britain was that "400 yards rewards the poor shot with an occasional hit while punishing the good shot with a lot of misses". Eventually policy was changed to let pilots set their own harmonisation range (and many had been unofficially doing so well before then). Most of the high scoring aces of the war didn't open fire until they were less and 200 yards from the target - many from 100 or less which risked a bit of left over airplane in the face but guaranteed enough hits to kill.
Re: It would surely not be surprising .....
We've already had people prosecuted for reading copies of the Christchurch shooters dribble down here. Apparently only the mighty and powerful have brains that can resist the ideas within - all us plebs would instantly be turned into mass shooters from one glimpse of his written fuckwittery.
So yes, I could see people being ... frowned upon ... for daring to read this.
Go die in a ditch Crapita. While there are worse outsourcers than you, they had to work really really really hard to get there. I hope that in future years former managers will leave a gap in their CV ("I was in jail for animal worrying") rather than list working there because the stain will stick.
Satellites with lasers and machine guns coming! China's new plans? Trump's Space Force? Nope, the French
Re: Let's face it, who amongst us hasn't lost a tie to the...
Uggh, Polo shirts. Those things are hideous. Well hideous when worn by the typical IT bod anyway. Nothing says stylish like a nice polyester polo shirt with a company logo hidden by man-boobage, beer belly poking out above the chinos, sweat stains under the armpits and a glimpse of chest hair (with or without the gold medalion).
Looks very professional. I'll stick to wearing a nice cotton business shirt thanks (which was what I told the boss at the last place that wanted to "gift" us all a polo shirt to wear - and a single shirt at that.
Backdoors won't weaken your encryption, wails FBI boss. And he's right. They won't – they'll fscking torpedo it
Here we go: Uncle Sam launches antitrust probe into *cough* Facebook, Google *cough* Amazon *splutter* Twitter...
It's not about fairness, it's about power
The point is always about power. The power to lean on people and companies who might offend the rich and connected.
As a historical point of interest I was reading recently how the Nixon administration leaned on the 'big three' TV channels back before Watergate came to light - nudge nudge, wink wink, nice TV channel, I'd sure hate for it to be regulated a bit more, wouldn't you.
I don't particularly trust the likes of google, twatter et. Al. to do the right thing. I have even less trust of the government doing so.