I am on your side. No matter what the legislature states in it's words, entry conditions favour the big players. They can afford the costs of doing it. Imagine applying for a small project as an individual. Total size, maybe £15M. Now imagine the costs of bidding; this is just a guess but I suspect you must include:
Equal opportunity compliance proof.
Gender reassignment policy proof.
All of the green requirements including
* Disposal of waste products policy
* Costed global warming impact statements
* Policies w.r.t. employees who are whistleblowers about breach of any policy
* 3 years audited tax returns as a small enterprise
Proofs of (if you are a small team of 3-4 people making a "we can do this bid, and we should do it cos it is important):
* 3 similar projects performed with full washups on how it was done and the top 3 catastrophes in each project:
* these as usually something like "We got Earl Grey tea, rather than English breakfast"
* Mr. Jones didn't particularly work well with us but we learned to get along
Suboptions
a) He died of old age.
b) We came to a mutual understanding (no comment at all about how this happened)
c) After a while he was moved and his replacement was really motivated to finalise the solution (no comment at all about how this happened).
d) The project was not as successful as we had originally projected but with the institutionalised and localised hostility it can be seen that our success was particularly noticable
And so on and so on.
And now you are a big firm like Crapita wanting to ensure you keep the small jobs because:
* They are relatively easy
* They are relatively likely not to fail
* There are a lot more of them
* And once we are in their, we are in.
* And we have a shed load, a garage load, and a green house load of ex civil servants, who spent years designing these barriers to entry, and for a small cost to us, can negate the barriers with a magic wand of knowing what is wanted. (Don't waste time answering the questions, just include all this shit from here, here, oh, and most importantly here. Don't worry about what it says; as long as it ticks the right boxes, no-one will check anyway.)
* And, of course, finally, here, cut and paste it from our previous 321 applications last month.
I don't know the answer, but I do note that regulatory barriers tend to increase, not decrease. And this ensures that new entries can be crowded out.