I have to disagree
" Private sector welfare and disability assessment, another outsourcing failure".
My daughter who has severe fibromyalgia along with major arthritis issues had absolutely no issues what togever to get PIP. Admittedly I had to go to the original hearing as:
* her representative in her initial hearing (appeal rejected)
* her representative in her appeal hearing (appeal rejected)
* Write her request for permission to appeal to a Tier 1 tribunal (unpaid for all of this)
* Read her response from the request to appeal to that appeal (this bit is just unbelievable) Appeal denied as it wasn't necessary; 5 major flaws in law in a three page judgement.
* Attend the new phone heard case along with my wife, which was cancelled 15mins before the appeal as apparently no one had noticed that the three judges had been recused from th original case. (Well I did but apparently that was insufficient until the court had already been assembled - when someone finally bothered to read the papers. We had no prior notice of the panel, and so could not challenge it in advance) My wife took an unpaid day off work, leading to about 20-30 patients being cancelled at relatively short notice, with no compensation for their fuck up, but they sent my daughter an email which said they couldn't send it to me as I wasn't her representative [ Want to take a bet on that ] but no offer of compensation nor any sugestion that they would do anything to ensure this didn't happen again (like, read the paperwork, you know, it can't be that hard. Perhaps between important things like making a cuppa , or sucking the arse of the boss).
* Getting a letter which said they had decided there were no problems, ands thus removing all support. The Dr involved assumed that my daughter had walked to the shops, refused to listen to me as "they were now getting somewhere". After she had demonstrated that she had the forensic skills of a dead wasp I could finally ask a simple question; "how did you get to the shops, {name}", to which she replied "You drove me there". And how often have you done this ("not sure but 2 or three times in the last year"). This was followed on by "I see from your medical reccords provided that you have an almost normal range of motion of your arms, how do you explain that?" Again she would not let me help her with her desire to read that was which not there. Eventually I got a chance to make the point that this was passive movement (i.e. someone moving her arms, did not describe the pain involved as it was an assessment for osseus blocks), and got the response: "Oh I didn't notice that." Being the noce friendly chap that I am and bloody furious I asked the tribunal to adjurn until a competant medical advisor could be found. And then asked her where she qualified and if that was there normal standard.)
* eventually getting a letter from DWP who said that they had agreed my daughter needed the highest level of attendance allowance buts the tribunal had decided she didn't need mobility allowance. Which also stated "In view of previous decisions I have decided to overide that action
So no, I think you are as deluded as the system if you think there are any issues at all.
(Oh, and BTW, before I entered IT I was a clinician, and if I had made most of the mistakes they did then I would have been suspended, if not struck off.
So, it may or not be private, but fuck them all.