Re: Smartphones
@Psyx
'Underwater Locator Beacon', a.k.a. 'Underwater Acoustic Beacon'.
Beer can sized gadget. Triggered by water. Pings acoustically at about 37kHz at about 160 dB for either 30 or 90 days.
Usually attached to the "Black Boxes'.
4286 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Jun 2013
One good reason for an hourly handshaking signal is the same conceptual logic as your mobile phone: What if someone wants to call you? Where are you? How does the network find you?
A handshaking signal upon power-up and every hour thereafter is about right for the Inmarsat network to know at least under which satellite is the aircraft. In that way, they know where to find you (roughly), in case somebody is calling you.
Yes, the Inmarsat offers a vast range of modes and speeds. The satellites offer Global, Regional, and Spot beams (fixed pattern).
"...extremely difficult to land a large jet on water under any semblance of control, to the extent that it has *never* been done."
"We'll be in the Hudson." A very very high semblance of control.
Yes, a few bits broke off (e.g. an entire engine), but the only residual floaty bits were a couple of passengers that fell off the wing.
"ie downward at planet earth."
As opposed to randomly aiming off into space? And the Inmarsat satellite depends upon random airliners to keep its spatial orientation? Utter nonsense. Doesn't anyone have any common sense about how technology works, at least in general?
Ref: MH370_last_ping_corridors.jpg image.
Inmarsat at about 64E, .: must be I-3 F1 at 64.5E. Inmarsat satellites do have spot beams, but the pattern is fixed. These satellites do not steer beams onto individual aircraft clients. That is *obviously* impractical for a general service provider such as Inmarsat.
The oh-so confusing "tilt" angle of 40 degrees (ref image) is simply a representation of the calculated range ring from the satellite, where the computed range intercepts the Earth. The range was derived by Inmarsat boffins based on signal timing (range).
"The Northern arc seems a likely route..."
The two arcs are not routes. They are a representation of the possibilities for *** -> a single position at a single point in time, <- *** about 7.5 hours into the flight.
One single point anywhere along those lines. This is assuming that the boffins at Inmarsat have done their sums correctly - likely (but I hope that they've checked their assumptions).
They've made a mistake. They've reportedly instituted usage limits on cars.
They should have instituted limits on just the diesel smoldering cars and trucks. And then invited modern petrol powered cars to SVP leave their engines running day and night to clean the air.
"...within the travel time matching twice the length of the pitot tube... ...Can't be so hard."
Other than the tens-of-GHz counters required to measure the time of laser returns over the not-quite-enough-inches scale, yes - easy peasy.
Yet another concept would be your suggestion, but acoustic measurement. Sweep an audio signal and monitor the peak resonance as a function of unobstructed length.
There are already redundant pitot tubes. Unfortunately, there are also redundant mud dauber wasps, or redundant masking tape left after painting.
Given the ongoing problems with blocked pitot tubes, I hereby place these novel (?) inventions into the public domain.
First:
Using valves, high pressure air, and appropriate pressure senders, periodically blast some high pressure air out the pitot tubes. Monitor the resulting pressure signal for irregularities. Integrate this novel Pitot Tube (itself!) Built In Test (BIT) feature with the Air Data system so that it can be done periodically during flight.
The blast of high pressure air will simultaneously clean and test the actual tubes themselves. Any blockages would be fired out.
Next:
Use photosensors to monitor ambient light entering the pitot tube itself. Compare it against other references. Use LEDs to add light if required. Darker than expected means blocked.
These concepts would provide the ability to actually test the Air Data system, including the Pitot Tubes themselves. They'll require very clever implementation to avoid increasing the overall failure rate. The photosensor concept is probably more harmless in this regard. But I like the blast cleaning concept.
Cheers.
This "new" (?) tech is already a relatively common feature on satcom modems; the sort of modem that fits into a 19-inch rack and is ultimately connected to the big silly dish outside. In that application, the EIRP needs to be adjusted down a bit to account for the fact that the two transmitters are aimed at the exact same transponder at the exact same time. Each modem cancels out what it transmitted (Y) from what it receives (Y+X), revealing the desired signal from the other guy (X). So the transponder can be used in both directions at once, in almost exactly the same manner as a single twisted pair can carry telephone conversations in both directions at once.
"To combat [battery quality control issues, possibly contributing to battery fires in their cars], Musk is planning an American battery factory that will make batteries from raw materials instead of components, [reducing the long term risk to his brand, negative press caused by the occasional car fire]."
There, I fixed it for you.
"Also, insects have antennae; televisions have antennas."
And Aereo (I believe) has non-functional, fake little "antennas" that fulfill a pure legal-decoration function.
If wee little paperclip antennas installed in racks in the basement data centers actually worked, then why does everyone else spend so much time up on the roof struggling to get an OTA HD signal? Why doesn't Aereo drop this service model and start selling these amazing "antennas" to the public? Perhaps the same technology can be applied to directly detect signals from deep space missions using nothing more than a slightly larger paperclip?
The BBC World Service top-of-the-hour 'pips' arrive at my house about 15 seconds late (referenced to a variety of reliable time sources). I suspect that SiriusXM satellite radio is fed through the Interweb, and the latencies here and there, not to mention the trip to and from the satellites, and some buffering in the radio itself, it all adds up to about 15 seconds. Sometimes 18. Making it all kinda pointless in a charming sort of way.
I expect that the 'High Frequency' Traders will eventually move to neutrino communications, shooting neutrinos straight through the Earth's core. Shorter path.
Not ready for prime time. Turn on GPS and the high capacity Li-Ion battery goes flat in about two hours (YMMV). Amusingly, a dedicated handheld GPS works on two low capacity AA cells for many, many hours; thus proving that the people that design smartphones have made a FAIL. They need to fix that.
...tip it up on edge, vertically.
Then Beardy Branson and Elon Musk will participate in the project.
Beware, Musk will want to run the whole thing on batteries, recharged by solar power. And Branson will one day bring Justin Bieber along, leading to all sorts of trouble.
If they run out of disk space (LOL), they could use a hash. Obviously.
Another option might be to include some unprintable characters as a type of 'Google Translate wuz here' watermark. If people are cutting and pasting, then they might not notice the watermark.
Meanwhile, how come nobody has seeded the 'net with Monty Python style nipple-fondling mistranslations?
e-book = often $10, sometimes outrageously higher.
Used Hardcover Book - Very Good or Like New = often $0.01 + S&H = $6.50 (YMMV)
$10 price class gets you into the 'Signed By Author' category of used books - Collectible.
Yes, I have a Kobo, and Kindle Apps on several types of tablets and smartphones. No, I'm not paying $10 for an e-book. The e-readers are loaded up with lots of free classics that need to be read, pdfs, etc.