When a journo says allude, they’re not stating a fact
“In an interview with ITV on Monday, Reeves suggested Moscow's fingerprints were on recent cyber incidents affecting major UK firms. The comments appeared to allude to the recent hacks on Marks & Spencer, Co-op, Harrods, and Jaguar Land Rover, though the chancellor stopped short of naming any specific cases.”
So in other words, a journo watched the TV and decided that the politician “seemed to allude” to recent high profile incidents. The Chancellor didn’t say it was linked, THE JOURNO DID. And the journo did that because they have 1000 words to fill and a story about ‘incompetent chancellor’ is better/easier to write than one about whether and how much hostile states might be conducting cyber operations against the UK.
Moreover it’s entirely possible for more than one thing to be true at the same time. It’s possible - perhaps even probable that both the statements below are true.
1. Russia is committing cyber attacks against UK businesses
2. The high profile cases in the article were committed by Brits.
And people wonder why the right wing press find it so easy to manipulate opinion.