Metamonopoly
Nobody can have a monopoly but MS!
Competition is against the Mafia ethic.
744 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jul 2007
The other day I was walking down the street with a gun and a shifty looking guy I didn't know came up to me and said "Hey, point that thing straight down and pull the trigger." I did, of course, as anyone would, and seriously injured my foot. Obviously this is not on.
I have contacted Browning, the manufacturer of my gun, and asked why they don't follow me around and give me a second opinion with reference to any advice I receive from untrusted strangers about what target I ought to fire upon, but they seem totally disinterested (typical of Browning!).
So thankfully Kaspersky Firearm Security Co. are investigating the possibility of developing a device which could be fitted to a handgun which could determine, when the trigger is pulled, whether the weapon is trained on the user's foot. Obviously this involves some pretty heavy image analysis but it's totally worthwhile. A lot of people use Browning firearms so this problem urgently needs to be solved, and a few million machine years of computation has got to be worthwhile.
I will not send MS Office files, even (especially?) where they are specifically requested.
I don't open MS Office files either - if someone really wants to communicate with me they should be happy enough to send me a Postscript, PDF, plain text, HTML, DVI, ODF (or virtually any other format) file, surely?
Unfortunately I do have to make an exception at work because everyone uses MS Office here and I don't want to be an awkward bastard...
You've got to be kidding me. Some arse takes my money under duress and spends it on himself, and it's 'prudish' to object?
I agree with the fixed salary suggestion. It could be quite a high fixed salary, but absolutely no perks and absolutely no other employment. And a revision of the electoral system would be welcome too.
If they'd said all websites, all the time it would have been misleading. If they'd suggested the web access was unlimited, that would have been misleading. But as far as I can see all they suggested was that, with their service, I could at a time of my choice access a website of my choice.
Unless I'm much mistaken their service would provide me with exactly that facility.
Actually I use no anti-malware and am not cautious about what sites I visit or attachments I open. I'm on Linux and I've never had a problem as a result of this wanker behaviour. As a regular wanker, I would like to assert that having a half-decent OS does seem to help.
Any other wankers have similar experiences? Or am I just a lucky wanker?
I love my running horn. Nobody pulls out in front of me since I replaced that silly push-to-make, release-to-break button with a (simpler, more reliable) length of wire.
Oh, and by the way, if your 4x40W car stereo is really using more power than your headlights, turn it down before you perforate your ear drums...
"even Linux comes with bundles of free applications - you could argue that the authors are getting wads of free advertising from Linux installations and Linux distros should be completely unbranded and not come with anything bundled"
That's a little different. Linux actually comes with nothing bundled - it's just a kernel. Red Hat, Canonical et al provide 'distributions' - these are innately 'bundles' so it's hard to object to the bundling. Even the default shell is not 'part of Linux' but a sort of bundled application (you can run Linux boxes entirely without bash if you want).
Since the bundled applications are provided for free by their developer communities and often not advertised in any way other than this bundling (and in the majority of cases, not actually installed by default anyway, just made available), it's hard to see how the Linux situation parallels Microsoft's habitual strategic injection of second-rate content into Windows systems.
"Saving this file as ODF may cause the loss of formatting information, rainforests and endangered species. Click No to save in Microsoft's universally approved standard OXML, or Yes to save in the Communist ODF format and help fund terrorism, people trafficking and child pornography rings."
I've heard that argument so many times. Very little of software developers' pay comes from the sale value of the software they write. I'm paid to develop software that has zero sale value because my employer wants to use it. If it was open source and distributed freely it wouldn't impact its use value and wouldn't hurt my salary.
Most software developers employed in the UK and worldwide are paid based on the use value of the software, not its sale value. Most of us are working on systems that are not really worth distributing, because they are quite exactly matched to the requirements of a particular business.
Well, anyway, I'm not going to write the whole argument out again. Eric S. Raymond said it best anyway. I recommend reading some of his essays.
We don't all choose Windows. Fewer and fewer of us do.
And I can honestly say, having worked in a couple of computer shops (in a sales/tech role) before getting a 'real' IT job, that virtually no customer actually asks for Windows. They just get it (and pay for it) by default.
Although fortunately where I worked we had no cosy special relationship with Microsoft so on the rare occasions when someone asked for Linux, we were happy to install it, support it, and give them a discount.