Re: Within limits
No, that is not the case under US law. Please stop spreading false or poorly understood legal information. Nowhere in Section 230 of the CDA does it say that if you edit you are responsible for content. Normal editing which does not change the meaning does not expose you to responsibility, and moderating definitely does not expose you to responsibility. Only if you change the meaning while editing might you be responsible.
https://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/230
The EFF wrote:
> Do I lose Section 230 immunity if I edit the content?
>
> Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you
> exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish. You
> may also delete entire posts. However, you may still be held responsible for
> information you provide in commentary or through editing. For example, if you edit
> the statement, "Fred is not a criminal" to remove the word "not," a court might find
> that you have sufficiently contributed to the content to take it as your own. Likewise,
> if you link to an article, but provide a defamatory comment with the link, you may
> not qualify for the immunity.