let's hope
this crap will not be forced onto outsiders (just because they held a job at "progressive" employer).
827 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2013
I'm in the same boat. But one has to admit that they are in tough spot. No real possibility to offer true web browser on iOS, marginalized on Android and MS is pushing the same agenda on Windows (because all OS vendors like to shamefully peek into user's data stream). So Mozilla is giving away independence for appearances, after all superficial user experience is all that mattered and dumbing down is they way to go (yeah right). They have alienated geeks while not gaining noobs (that settle for platform's defaults). The interface has got too chromey-feely, no man-in-the-middle sync got shafted and revolution is on the horizon. Still, for now there's about:config and Palemon (and alike) for for those that pick and chose for themselves. No matter whats it's still better than big brothers' browsers.
I believe the issue is due to faster deceleration on the main parachute (same drag less mass pulling it down for lighter folks) while the pilot's head (and heavy helmet) suspended on the (weaker) neck continues down at original velocity (due to its own inertia). So for a moment there's potential for speed difference between the seat (and pilots body) and the head/helmet and resulting injuries. I'd guess that delayed opening of the main parachute let's the pilot-chute decelerate some of velocity though changes to helmet construction and neck brace (or whatever stabilizing device they implemented) would probably be of greater importance.
BS, that "i7" in 13" MBA is just i5 with marketing pixie dust sprinkled on top. And even that mobile i3 is not whole lot worse - just half the cache and some less essential features fused off. True i7 can only be had in MBP. Any of these processors will smoke A10 in just about any task. Power usage (and device size) and possibly price will be the only downsides. Even Core M will be faster than A10.
No replacement for displacement.
Well, he (presumably) was not a total a..e and "responsibly" landed only himself in that ditch. World of intelligent vehicles will be full of close (by human standards) calls. One will have to look the other way and grow thick skin. Bad drivers at least also risk their lives. Computers... relay on
infallibility of the code.
Well, lost/stolen devices happen. I'm curious if the problem/exploit also relied on MS sign in (so anyone can just login in if connected to some network). Once in they trigger restart into the safe mode (this can be accomplished in other ways) and pick saved creds that not only give them access to local content but also to cloud stuff (if the legit owner was not quick to react and change the password online). Unintended consequences of pushing "sign in with MS accout" so excuse that "Microsoft will not fix the attack vector since it depends on hackers already having access to a Windows machine." may be weak.
I've had no time to bother with the anniversary update and my "metered" connection won't let it slip through, so I can's say if preemptive registry permissions blocks I've applied will hold or not (including number of restricted firewall rules MS created themselves that I tweaked into my favor). The problem is that this cat and mouse game is not worth the Windows 10 experience.
I bet that any half-decent start menu replacement (like startisback) would make for clean and customizable interface but system's foundation will remain compromised and can't be trusted without countless hours spent on analyzing network traffic (that's likely encrypted).
And in general, MS idea of what's right for me (and the amount of traffic this generates) does not fit into my "broadband" connection. 550MB per cumulative security update, really (blobs that can be picked from MS update catalog does not add up to that number). And stupid apps (I have not asked for) generate additional traffic and waste cpu cycles.
"Microsoft's update for Adobe Flash Player on Windows and Windows Server." - exactly what true server needed. It's surprising these fools have not bundled their crappy Silverlight as well (though number of admins fell for it anyway and pushed it down the line). Probably time to move back to safe W7 platform (especially that I've disabled cumulative updates that keep turning on unwelcome features on 10).
Some 2 years ago I had to google some printer firmware issue. To my amazement one of results was admin interface of an HP printer in some local government office in Canada. I used opportunity to just print out polite message to take the thing off the Internet. I bet I could retrieve some of recent print jobs (if I cared for that).
I'm actually fine with peer distributed updates ... within my LAN only. Sadly, I did no see it working even though my LAN is definitely faster than my "broadband". Now, letting MS off the hook, saturating my upload link and burning through my data caps (however unlikely at my "broadband" speed) is of no interest to me. If anything, I'd like to show MS my appreciation for their constant "improvements" of Windows experience and add towards their bandwidth costs (to make up for the amount of telemetry I'd severely cut across my systems). Heck, I'd be willing to run script up/downloading random bits to OneDrive to help that cause.
While the enterprises have much greater control over the environment having expertise or just imagination to toggle essential boxes is not always the case. Especially when MS seems to like complicating policies. Anyway, cumulative updates will remain such - at some point one is forced to apply all the crap at once (and deal with the fallout).
Unfortunately so called "suites" like to be seen as hip and progressive and will push this crap on businesses if only to avoid being caught into next XP sunset event. Business reasons and costs be damned (and so the privacy of employees). Sometimes it seems like MS is not just about Windows but also revolving doors.
I can't see any strategic importance of this contract. That diesel/electric submarine was good against fishing boats (or maybe some cargo ships) and not adversary capable of/interested in hacking DCNS. It's odd that India even bothered, unless waste of money was the only purpose.
@TJ
none of the "benefits" you listed were "extremly valuable". And mandating certain functionality by government does not make it valuable (unless you meant additional expense) or even just popular with consumers (that are simply taken away the freedom of choice). I have very little appreciation for all-in-one solutions and prefer modularity with open interface. You like your car with kitchen, sink and Internet access? Fine, but don't postulate that everyone else should share your preferences (and I bet that most is fine with single subscription for a mobile phone). IoT appears to serve mostly the vendors and pushes agenda of digital servitude. Business suits will surely swallow the bite - as usual eager to spend before the tax revenue, not so much with paying or hiring employees.
Then there's also the issue of timing. When they switched to lightning connector the market was growing and the new phone offered significant improvements over the previous gen. I don't see much gains beyond gimmicks this time (as 6s offered generous performance gains that should last for a while). Removing features that large percentage of customers relied is bad judgment and likely costly mistake in in this market climate.
"Crucially, if Master Override is activated and one of the altimeters is malfunctioning, the Watchkeeper opens up its “ground touch” window from 1m sensed altitude to 20m sensed altitude. In other words, the drone might decide it has landed even when it is still 65 feet up. Once the on-board computer decides the Watchkeeper has made contact with terra firma, it is programmed to select full downwards pitch"
I'd love to see the video of the "landing"
you know, this is American thing to kick the little guy. All the emission controls imposed on small vehicles while pickups and trucks get exemption. And as long as it's "only" CO2 a vehicle can spew tons of it (this may be changing in the end). Same here, they woke up to the fact of high power PCs (supposedly dying breed anyway), while all those proliferating data center wasting electricity for cloudy BS are just OK and cool (if only because of AC;).
Do people sign in to Bing? Really? Brilliant.
I'd never sign in to Google on desktop as well. I've made exception (using some throw away account) on a tablet and only because one has no option (and I've used it for nothing of any importance).
As a long time user and advocate I've become somewhat disappointed with ATI's problems handling UEFI and GPT disks (boot media in particular). Their cloud down your throat strategy (sign in/create account to activate) was just a step too far. All these issues have been addressed by Macrium's Felect software. Fast, reliable and easy to use (personal/free version). I bet the same applies to their enterprise offerings.