Won't they get sued?
Won't the voting machine manufacturers just sue (or just threaten to sue) the researchers?
15 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2013
@BitterExScientist,
I was at a developer conference recently where Dell had a booth for their Project Sputnik. I asked the dude at the booth what it was all about, he explained that they are Dell laptops with Linux preloaded. I asked "why not just install Mint on a ThinkPad?". He replied, "well if you want to go to all that trouble...". It's no trouble at all, I've been doing it for so long I don't even find it a chore. Just part of playing with the new shiny. And does anyone think Dell can resist putting crapware on their Linux boxes?
... to find out what other shenanigans this Mocek character is up to. Even if they had to get a warrant, I'm sure telling the judge that he requested documents from the city would be enough to get it signed.
And while I'm betting:
"The information Sensus has redacted contains specific details that, if publicly released, would increase the risk of both cyber-intrusions and physical attacks on the utility grid," Sensus says in its filing.
Anyone else think these specific details are "The default password is 'password'. And the default password can't be changed." ?
@DougS,
The State Department recording keeping policy requires keeping paper copies of emails? Citation please.
Or was Hillary's delivery of 55,000 pieces of paper just a big FU to the investigators? Bury them in paperwork, make it impossible to just run a search, easy to omit anything you don't want them to see, no metadata...
And no, this does not mean I support Drumpf. At best Hillary broke the rules because she didn't feel like following them. At worst she broke the rules because she planned to keep anyone from seeing some of her State Department communications. And she's still the lesser of two evils. The United States is truly Fucked.
You are so right. Fucking mind boggling that the head of the CIA has work related documents in a personal email account. I work in the financial services industry. We can't access personal email from work. Period. But does the US intelligence community have any such controls? Nope. Unfortunately this will be spun as "See, this is why we need more domestic spying!".
"Receipts filed under FBI Contract JFB108289 regularly exceeded hundreds of thousands of dollars a month"
Surely hundreds of thousands of dollars a month should cover the overhead of providing this data. If doing so were affecting their bottom line, corporations would be a lot more upset about it than the after the fact "we're outraged!" press releases that we've seen. I'd like to think that they would automate most of the process of transferring the data to law enforcement so each request becomes more of a button click than a manual process, but who knows. I understand that automation isn't free, but since they can basically name their price I don't see how they could fail to profit from this.
I'm sure all the corporations involved in the PRISM data transfers were also well compensated for the infrastructure they had to set up to support it. Not just repaid for their expense, but with profit - think government contract.