Sounds sappy and goofy considering the evolution of the eye is already common knowledge amongst evolutionary biologists and the scientific field in general so the idea of "where the eye came from" is a disproven religoquack notion yet there are still those out there who will use this chestbut as if it weren't already answered.
No thanks. It obviously isn't THAT intelligent if it's trying to play off a scientist who doesn't even know about already established science.