Shouldn't this be titled....
"How many Reg columnists does it take to turn ON a lightbulb?"
Answer - One restless, horizontal columnist.
1429 publicly visible posts • joined 28 May 2013
Personally, I find people who listen outside the mainstream, are more likely to be independent free thinkers rather than sheep... and make good conversation at the dinner table... whereas sheep on the other hand, tend to be served up on said dinner table :-D ... statistically speaking, of course.
I can tell you that a number of the channels that I follow, have had all comments stripped from all their videos, and the ability to post new comments also stripped.
Laowhy86's channel is one such. More than 322,000 subscribers, he has a YouTube creator contact so has direct communication with YouTube, as a creator.... and even he can't get this reversed on his channel. I've gone through a handful of his past videos and every one that I've checked so far, has had the comments removed.
All we can do now, is grab the popcorn, sit back and see how this turns out.
They can't even ban ONE MAN from their platform.
That's right. Ace conspiracy theorist nut job Alex Jones is STILL broadcasting on the system despite being banned from the platform. There's even an account "Alex Jones" which is broadcasting the man himself, and YouTube are totally asleep at the wheel.
He's been all over the platform since the ban, and it's not boding well for their ability to control anything.
Some years ago, each of their candidates was given a copy of the database for their leadership campaigns.
I found out after receiving numerous unwanted SMS messages and called Labour HQ to get my mobile number taken off the database to stop the SMS texts, only to be told that it wouldn't change anything as the candidates each had a copy of the membership database. And I went off on one. I reported it to the commissioner but it went nowhere.
I've long left the party and to hear something like this, doesn't surprise me. People just seem to have such a caviller attitude to privacy and people's data.
From what was detailed in the article, I believe that the judge thinks there is plenty in the file names, etc. to believe that the hard drives contain the digital equivalent of a loaded firearm. Given that, I can understand why they don't believe him entirely innocent and don't want to let him have the hardware back.
I actually use fax to correspond with my GP when planning non-urgent things. It's quicker than writing a letter and I can write it, and my GP can read it, at times that suit us, independently of each other. I don't waste a GP appointment... and when I do have an appointment, we've got a good grounding on what's going on, as we've had "discussion" already, so the appointment is shorter and everyone's happy.
Fax, I believe, is better than e-mail because e-mail is just too easy and liable to lead to the GP surgery being inundated.
Adapt the underground for unicyclists.
Replace the trains with a conveyor belt that a unicycle slots into, and rides the track to the next station. They'll need to lift their legs, of course, or else the peddles will repeatedly whack them in the shins.
People can get exercise by riding their unicycle in a holding position while at their standing desks. Lifts between floors will be interesting.
I work for government. Being cynical is part of the job description. Yes Minister.
They are counting collections and separate data breaches as "breached sites" so I suppose that's where the problem is coming from. Telling me x number of breached sites, but actually being within larger collections.
I believe they used to tell you what sites you were breached from... but now it looks like that's gone. They only point you to an FAQ, so I can't easily tell how bad the damage is. Perhaps that's what's happening... so many people say, "Meh, that's so old that i won't bother buying these password services..." so they've stopped telling people which sites they were pwned on, perhaps in the hope of panicking more people to buy their services.
A few discussions here have been around the fact that phones live in our pockets, hips, desks, and get damaged. Not only cost of phone to replace, and cost of insurance, but also inconvenience. A few people are starting to carry multiple devices now... or internet services that don't require a single device to access the music/pictures/etc. - ie. as we move to a service economy, then tying down those web services to a device, could be considered a bad move.
China's projects aren't delivering.
Latin American projects failing - https://money.cnn.com/2016/02/16/news/economy/china-latin-america-projects-fail/index.html
One Road One Belt failing - https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/09/chinas-new-silk-road-is-getting-muddy/
I hear the Africa investment isn't going too well either.
They have a debt problem - https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/16/chinas-debt-is-250-of-gdp-and-could-be-fatal-says-government-expert - that isn't getting any better and the domestic property market has been rising above realistic levels and with the wage growth being significant and talk about American companies starting to migrate production back to the USA over the next ten years because of this... I don't see as rosy a picture as you.
I have to admit that I was surprised to read of a domestic debt problem in China. I believed that their population was one of savers - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-01/china-warms-up-for-2018-critical-battles-with-cooling-economy
Nightly Business Report this morning. They obviously reported on this, and the side note was that while this was true, it wasn't the whole story. I do know of my friends that use Apple devices, they're making them last longer and are now upgrading every three years.
At the end of that episode of NBR, they did state that China's economy was slowing but because of the trade wars, they can't deploy their usual trick of devaluing their currency.
I did also read elsewhere that Huwawe devices were being given away to staff (of some companies) for free, to spite and undermine Apple (read USA) in retaliation for the trade war.
It does look like China is going to finally hit the economic buffers and isn't going to be left to cheat its way out this time. I wonder why that's the reason why Xi wants Taiwan more badly than ever before and is willing to send in the troops this time... for the economic boost it would bring.
I do know that it's now only the hardest of my friends and colleagues who are buying everything Apple produces; the majority have discovered other things to spend their money on. ... like food !!!
.... this from 2015 - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/nov/26/youre-dead-police-thought-man-trying-to-kill-spider-was-attacking-wife
“It was a spider,” the man replied sheepishly. “A really big one.”
“What about the woman screaming?”
“Yeah sorry, that was me,” he said. “I really, really hate spiders.”
It’s not the first time a spider has sparked alarm. Another arachnophobe set a service station in Michigan on fire in September after he tried to scare a spider away from his petrol tank using a lighter, with predictable results.
Most PC's and laptops can be taken apart and be maintained. I have an 8 year old I7 Tosh laptop that's still rocking. A number of the laptops I've used have had panels underneath which give access to the heatsinks so that they can be brushed clear.
Regular maintenance is just part of owning a machine, like changing the oil on a car... something which the average consumer just doesn't seem to be aware of. It's as if they think that laptops, etc. are just magic boxes that sit under desks and perform their magic until the hard drive gets full and it's time to change the whole box, because the operating system is not supported any more... or some such guff. (in my neck of the woods, the PSU seems to be the most common point of early failure these days. Used to be RAM death.)
So the idiot tax is working exactly as designed... a tax on idiots ... or to be more honest, those who are uneducated in maintenance of their machines. And those who are now educated in such things, are starting to get upset because they've finally realised how Apple works. (and a few others, to be honest... some laptops do require a certain degree of disassembly for dust maintenance... those who install the screw panels are the good guys who put a bit of extra thought for the customer)
https://www.smh.com.au/national/dentists-website-on-leaked-blacklist-20090319-93cl.html
Jocelyn Ashcroft, who runs a school canteen consultancy in Queensland, also said she had no idea why her site had made it on to the list. "The only thing I can think of is that I have emailed schools telling them about my book and CD resource How To Have A Healthy And Profitable Theme Day," she said.
...
Daniel Purser, who runs a web hosting and design company out of NSW, was also shocked to learn that his site had been blacklisted. He said there was "no chance" his customers were hosting questionable content.
...
The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy, yesterday said the list was not genuine.
David132 Well, someone either didn't get it, or didn't like it :-)
Re. The Goonies house... sounds like a nerd who doesn't want to share. I mean... why else buy The Goonies house! - *sigh* - those were the days.
And yes, I did watch Short Circuit to the end, from the robot fight scene, shortly after making the post :-)
...to show what animals in a cage really look like.
(Wimpy fan ... Burger King at a push... but there's more nutrition in MaccyD's boxes than in their burgers as far as I'm concerned.)
Old joke... what's the difference between a post and under graduate? The undergrad asks if you'd like fires with your Big Mac... the post grad asks if you want fries with your Whopper.
The following is a joke... of course... to the tune of, "Blame Canada"
The irony is the last part, because as Joyce said in the article, "... the wakeup call for all of us to get serious about addressing the massive and unacceptable vulnerability..."
----
Time's have changed
The Internet's getting worse
They won't obey the IETF
...and go to V6 instead
Should we blame the government?
Or blame society?
Or blame the traffic of Internet TV?
No, blame Africa, blame Africa
Their update was a surprise.
They re-routed all our files.
Blame Africa, blame Africa
We need to form a full assault
It's Africa's fault
----
Don't blame my poor old router
It saw the wrongest route
And now it's off to China and Japan.
And Russia's on the path
My files have gone "Прощай"
And buggered off to the East instead of West
Well, blame Afria, blame Africa
Something technical went wrong
When Africa came along
Blame Africa, blame Africa
They're not even between me and L.A.
My data could have been a movie, or a best selling book.
Now it's down a black hole, come and look.
Should we blame the fibre?
Should we blame the light?
Or the technicans who buggered it up last night?
Heck no
---
Blame Africa, blame Africa
'Cause of MainOne's hullabaloo
They lost all your traffic too
Blame Africa, shame on Africa
All the smut got lost, the traffic all got crossed
All this routing mess must be undone
We must blame them and cause a fuss
Before someone thinks of blaming us
...it was MainOne in Africa - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46194279
The following is a joke... of course... to the tune of, "Blame Canada"
----
Time's have changed
The Internet's getting worse
They won't obey the IETF
...and go to V6 instead
Should we blame the government?
Or blame society?
Or blame the traffic of Internet TV?
No, blame Africa, blame Africa
Their update was a surprise.
They re-routed all our files.
Blame Africa, blame Africa
We need to form a full assault
It's Africa's fault
----
Don't blame my poor old router
It saw the wrongest route
And now it's off to China and Japan.
And Russia's on the path
My files have gone "Прощай"
And buggered off to the East instead of West
Well, blame Afria, blame Africa
Something technical went wrong
When Africa came along
Blame Africa, blame Africa
They're not even between me and L.A.
My data could have been a movie, or a best selling book.
Now it's down a black hole, come and look.
Should we blame the fibre?
Should we blame the light?
Or the technicans who buggered it up last night?
Heck no
---
Blame Africa, blame Africa
'Cause of MainOne's hullabaloo
They lost all your traffic too
Blame Africa, shame on Africa
All the smut got lost, the traffic all got crossed
All this routing mess must be undone
We must blame them and cause a fuss
Before someone thinks of blaming us
There is, actually a contract section which applies. Unfortunately, there are two terms of service documents for YouTube, and I'm not really sure which of the two versions are actually in force. (EDIT - they might have sorted this out, finally)
https://www.youtube.com/t/terms
https://www.youtube.com/static?gl=CA&template=terms
Part of 6.c. of the second link ... " You also hereby grant each user of the Service a non-exclusive license to access your Content through the Service, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such Content as permitted through the functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service."
The trick is the, "through the functionality of the service".. so if you download the video in order to then use it in one of your videos which you then upload... you're out of 6.c. because you've gone outside the service in order to mash up the video. So none of this is very straightforward.
I recorded a video on the problem here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ABqh04n8lo - but it does appear that they might... finally... have actually synchronised the two terms of service.
ie. even though your uploaded work is copyrighted the instant you upload it... the simple act of uploading it to youtube, automatically grants every other youtube viewer the ability to use and reproduce it.
The problem for YouTube is that cleaning it up, will destroy their business model.
They get more adverts from a bootleg of the latest music hits, than they do from a video of me repairing a walkman. If they clean it up... then the income goes down the pan. That's the problem.
Personally, I'm also on Vimeo, where I pay for the privilege of having a channel. THAT is the proper business model, I believe. What should happen, in my eyes, is that every channel on YouTube should be charged for its existence, and rely on its viewers paying for the higher tier content.
Like I do now... I am a patron of a few channels. What I pay is affordable to me, and I get access to extra content which the non-subscribers don't see. I also get access to non-video content like subscriber blogs, etc. - the combined number of people like me, enables a living income for the content creators.
YouTube's current model actually penalises creators who use other platforms for income at the moment. That stifles the creators and limits them to video.
The whole model is selfish, inflexible, unpoliceable and doomed to fail.
Sorry Duncan, I have to disagree.
Shed loads of content on YouTube is pirated. I see it frequently. Channels go down, and new ones come up to replace them. That includes music piracy, and piracy of other people's videos. There is a lot of copyrighted content on YouTube.
YouTube actually have sod all control of their platform. Remember Alex Jones whose supposed to be banned from the platform? I'm currently tracking... fourteen channels re-broadcasting his live streams. Hang on, one channel just got banned outright. Thirteen.
YouTube actually have a very poor control of their platform, and I'm wondering how long it will be, before advertisers wake up to this, and that YouTube's comforting words about advert placement and figures, are actually worth nothing.
Also, as a creator, the false positives are sickening. I'm getting false copyright claims from their bots (and I know it's the bots because the videos are hit with strikes before they are published) and then I've got a battle to get those claims revoked. The YouTube content scanning system, from where I'm sitting, is a blunderbus that isn't even pointed at the barn door.
... I believe they are trying to put the frighteners on. And based on past behaviour, I wouldn't put it past them to go overboard deliberately, in order to stir up the hornets nest.
To be honest, this was coming someday. If the EU gives in now, then they might as well call it game over and hand over control of government to the corporates.