
Too late for Boeing?
Boeing Managment still don't seem to be getting it - they are the reason for Boeing's problems, not the workers.
306 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2013
Given that about 99.999% of companies require you to connect to their network via VPN if you are out-of-the-office for any reason means there's an awful lot of "persons of interest" around.
Anyways, the ones who are really dodgey are the ones who root their phones and install Lineage OS.
Oh FFS! I can't believe that in all of this you cite those pussies from alt.tastless when everybody who knows anything knows that the only flame war on Usenet that ever really mattrered (and was the flaming and trolling war that has forever set the bar at a level that has never again been witnessed anywhere (who gives a fck about careers ruined!?!?!?)) was the Meow Wars - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_Wars
Think you'll that many things - e.g. the likes of NMap and Wireshark - also get classified as PUPs (by Malwarebytes and others) - and that's fine because if you have installed them yourself, all you do is tick the relevant tick-box to add them to the safe list. Of course, if you haven't installed them, then you need to be alerted to their presence and probably want to worry.
Most vendors of "dual use" software aps don't get fussed - so what's Enigma trying to hide?
Presumably the logical conclusion of their mad plan is to withdraw from UN level international treaties now that they've withdrawn from treaties with the EU - since clearly it is always somebody else who is to blame for the UK's problems (foreigners in particular).
"IR35 is a reform unveiled in 1999 by the UK tax authorities..."
Not really. This was a punative tax regime brought in by Labour's Gordon Brown and his side-kick Dawn Primarolo in order to try and kill off self-employment and freelance working in the IT sector. Ironic that it is was under the existing Tory government that that task has now all but been completed.
"PS - I haven't done any statistical analysis of the distribution of chosen numbers."
That's ok. Somebody else has.
tl;dr version - pick the least popular numbers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/240734.stm
No, they mostly don't deliberately hobble good CPUs.
What actually happens is that you have a target chip performance of (e.g.) 2.5 GHz. - and then during manufacturing and chipcheck is that you will find that some don't work at that frequency, while others work beyond the design frequency. Most though tend to work around the initial design frequency. [Think about something called distribution curves].
However, not all cores on chips are equal. So typically poorer performing cores are diabled and those chips sold for less, while those with all cores performing well are sold for more.
Of course, where you have chips with disabled cores, you have the option (if you know what you are doing) to run things at lower clock speeds and see if you can re-enable those poorly performing cores and get more bangs for the bucks you spent.
Kinda sad that we now have to consider Kaspersky (and even Acronis (RTFM where it came from)) as fatally compromised. They are both great products, but the scenario though that a gun isn't now being put to the head of Eugene Kaspersky is no longer something that can be ignored as a possibility.
Kinda makes the case (if it wasn't made already) for doing your day-to-day surfing and web shopping, only ever in a virtual machine.
"If a company wants a worker to be inside IR35 then they write a contract that puts the worker in scope. The individual circumstances of a contractor don't matter at all."
Not really. If a contract puts you inside IR35 - i.e. makes you an employee - then you are an employee - that's actually really always been the case for all practicle purposes (from even before IR35) - regardless of your actual working conditions.
The problem is really the opposite of what you describe - if your contract puts you outside of IR35 - HMRC are free to disregard your contract AND then you will have to prove your working conditions put you outside IR35 - even if any reasonable person would regard then as barn door conditions that illustrate self-employment.
Why exactly would you be wanting to defrag a Windoze NTFS drive by booting into Linux (rather than Windoze) on your dual-boot machine?
Now don't get me wrong, you might want to be booting up some Linux based password cracking utils and file manipulation tools to be deployed against a Windows system - but these aren't the sort of thing your average user or business is likely to be doing on a day-to-day basis.
If your purpose is really wanting to run some heterogenous network, you'd already have some common platform command-interpreter tool installed on your systems that received a command and told the system to get on with defraging in its own native way (and tell me when you are finished).