You read it here first.
132 posts • joined 25 Apr 2013
Argh! You've conflicted my vote-button-pressing :-O
I agree about your first point that this was spun as "doing good" but clearly an opportunity for them to save costs = upvote.
But I disagree with you that the effect on Netflix has been unnoticeable = downvote.
I thought something was wrong with our TV or broadband connection until I did some digging and found the article confirming they had reduced the streaming rates.
Right up until the iPhone 8, I could stick £20-£25 per month into a savings-pot, and know I'd have enough in that pot to buy a new iPhone every couple of years. This worked fine for the 3GS, 4S, 5S, 6S, 8, paired with a well-negotiated SIM only deal @ £10-£15 per month.
Then the iPhone X came along @ almost 2x the cost of all the flagship models which came before it. That was way too much of a price jump for most folks to simply absorb, so the result is that most folks now just upgrade less often. I'm now aiming at once every 4 years instead of once every 2 years.
The good news is that iPhones do now seem to comfortably perform well for 4+ years if kept up to date and not abused too harshly, and Apple do seem to commit to 5+ years of iOS updates from when it was first released.
Probably not a bad thing from an environmental perspective either.
Not so good for Apple's figures though, if others are now halving the number of iPhones they purchase over a 4 year period!
I didn't know that, Pete 39 - backwards compatibility, where possible, does generally give the best of both worlds or at least eases transition for the majority of end-users/customers.
I guess it could be argued that the <10yr old DAB radios which already support DAB+, even if the customer isn't currently using it, is a form of backwards compatibility. The morning after RadioX was moved from DAB to DAB+, I was quite pleasantly surprised that it "just worked" on my in-car radio. I was expecting to have to re-scan or re-select the station at the very least.
I can sympathise as I also had a 1st-Gen Pure which can no longer receive the stations which recently migrated from DAB to DAB+
A cracking little set which has served me well, and it annoys me that Pure didn't include end-user-upgradable firmware in our particular radios; an oversight which for most “digital” equipment would ensure future obsolescence.
The good news though, is that some DAB radio manufacturers do seem to have learned from their previous mistakes and have evolved. Whilst our 15yr+ old 1st-gen Pure sets are sadly destined for the electronic waste pile, I was able to firmware-upgrade an approx. 10yr old PURE radio to enable DAB+, and do the same for a similar-age Roberts radio used by my parents.
In more recent years (about 7 years ago I think?) the leading DAB manufacturers committed to supplying all new DAB radios with DAB+ compatibility built in, ready to go. Google “DAB Digital Tick” if you’re interested in reading more.
I think (hope) that you, me and the other early adopters of DAB will be in the minority of folks who end up with an obsolete radio once stations fully migrate to DAB+. On the flip-side of the coin, the majority of DAB listeners, whose existing equipment can already support DAB+, will at last benefit from the much improved service.
It's not surprising there has been a "meh" attitude from the general public towards DAB, considering that the vast majority of the UK's Radio stations still broadcast on legacy DAB's lossy and cumbersome MPEG-1 format from the 1980s. On a decent receiver, music often sounds hollow/tinny compared to FM. When driving, the complete loss of audio vs. FM just getting a bit crackly from time-to-time is particularly frustrating.
There was a reasonable fix announced in the mid-00s, but progress has been painfully slow in the UK.
What's commonly referred to as DAB+ in the UK uses a much more efficient codec (a variant of AAC IIRC?). At the right bitrate, music will sound much closer to the depth of FM quality, and the much improved error correction should reduce the frequency of signal-drops whilst driving or in a low-reception area. Another bonus is it's much more spectrum-efficient. A 48kbps stereo stream on DAB+ should sound better than a 128kbps stream on legacy DAB.
As a working (but still rare) example, Global Radio recently switched some of their DAB 80kbps MONO stations to DAB+ 40kbps STEREO stations. The station I regularly listen to now sounds *much* better, and several of the spots I drive through which consistently used to drop the signal no longer do. This is on the same car stereo as I was using before they switched.
So, for a better end-user experience, and a more efficient use of spectrum available for digital radio, I believe a full DAB to DAB+ migration must be achieved before FM is switched off (if ever).
I've always felt uncomfortable seeing folks' home addresses splashed all over the media in relation to a trial. It's irrelevant to the general public at best, and at worst it facilitates acts of vigilantism.
I wonder how long it will be before a defendant challenges the practice as a GDPR breach?
Think of the Sonos speaker as being a dumb terminal which uses WiFi for connectivity, rather than Bluetooth/Airplay as other "wireless" speakers tend to use.
When you use the smartphone app to start a radio stream from Radioplayer/TuneIN or a track from Apple Music/Spotify, Sonos' cloud service establishes a direct connection between the stream source and your Sonos speaker.
Your smartphone app is merely a glorified remote control. Your smartphone is *not* used as a gateway device in the same way as it would be if you're using Airplay or Bluetooth etc.
I find this approach gives several advantages:
1. Syncronised grouping - you can play the same radio station/music track through several speakers, and they're all sync'd perfectly. So, no more going from room-to-room with the same radio station being played several seconds ahead/behind the neighbouring room's speaker.
I believe the Sonos achieves this by presenting the same source stream to all grouped speakers rather than needing to open a seperate stream for each speaker.
2. No drop-outs caused by your smartphone and speaker becoming out of range of each other.
3. Alexa/Google Home integration - probably doesn't need explanation.
Hope that helps?
Anyone else remember early-00s ISP Breathe's offer for "free freephone-dialup Internet forever* for a one-off £120 (ish)"?
*Forever = Until we realise we launched a wholly unstainable product and get slurped by Tiscali.
Another legacy e-mail gone. No flowers please.
No, you're not...
I'm into my 11th year with Virgin Media as my cable broadband provider (well, technically NTL in the first year or two) at three different addresses as I've moved around the county.
Speedtest.net has always reported at or above my advertised speeds, and the small number of outages have been fixed quickly and without fuss.
I've certainly never experienced the horror stories that BT/Openreach friends and associates have experienced, such as long lead times for connection, randomly disconnected services which aren't fixed for days/weeks, or fluctuating speeds.
I still believe that if "Nokia" re-lauched the ORIGINAL 3310 and the ORIGINAL 6310i and charged no more than £100, there'd be decent buy-in as the re-imagined versions are cheap and nasty both physically, and in terms of the OS.
Only things they may need to consider are a shift to the li-ion battery for the 3310 (6310i was already li-ion IIRC?), and support for 4G + VoLTE, considering 2G will eventually disappear.
Each time the celebratory trumpets sound the “success” of EE coming out top (again), I shake my head in disappointment that “the best” means:
1. No indoor 4G coverage in many buildings I frequent within 3 miles of a large city centre
2. No data or calls during power cuts
Will be interesting to hear our Police Chief’s response when EE instruct him to inform his officers it’s unlikely to be a network issue, and they just need to reset their device’s network settings. Again. To no avail. Again.
"A spokesperson for the Home Office told The Register: "We have been clear that the operation of commercial multi-user gateways can have the impact of masking the identities of suspected terrorists and criminals which threatens our national security."
Yet deliberate CLI spoofing via other methods is still OK.
Not sure whether to call bullsh*t or stupidity?
I still have an early device from Honeywell's Total Comfort Connect range, which in addition to the thermostat on the wall, also has a "gateway" box which is connected to my LAN, communicates with the wall thermostat via a proprietary wireless link, and holds a local cache of the app-programmed schedule.
This level of built-in resilience to keep the system working as normally as possible in the event of a connectivity or cloud-based failure is the very reason I opted for this system over others available at the time.
So, whenever the inevitable <1% (annually) downtime for the “connected” features of the system occurs, it’s nothing more than a minor irritation. I still wake up to a suitably heated house, and I still have a system in place which will at least work as well as my old non-connected 7-day programmable thermostat did.
Bootnote: Obviously, the gateway box sits on a dedicated IoT VLAN with some firewally-goodness going on for good measure :-)
"I think you will find the default configuration used by Virgin Media is to link the TV box to the Internet via the WiFi." - Roland6
Considering that a substantial part of Virgin Media's offering is traditional fixed broadband, the conspiracy theorist may argue that they do have a vested interest in making their TV offering rely upon it in some way by default.
However, I think the conspiracy theorist would be giving VM too much credit for lateral thinking on that one :-D
It'll take time, but I can see it coming. Perhaps I was slightly off the mark, and what we'll see in the standard home market is a 5G version of the current xDSL home WiFi routers, eg same WiFi to the devices around the home, mains powered, with the WAN link being 5G instead of xDSL. This could also feature an external aerial socket to overcome indoor 5G coverage issues.
D'ya know what, I think I've just landed on Version 2 of my vision already!
Give it around another 10yrs, and I can absolutely see this quote coming true. If 5G truly delivers consistently high speeds and low latency.
A typical (non Reg-reading) household connects every single one of their Internet devices to their ISP supplied WiFi-router by default. Yes, even the 4K Smart TV which is less than a metre away from the bl**dy router!
With virtual SIMs now in play, it wouldn’t be an unimaginable leap for all of these consumer devices to be able to connect to a 5G network instead of just WiFi.
Inter-device connectivity within the home is already being tackled by vendors such as Sky Q and some premium home audio systems who simply use their own “mesh” network transparently in the background rather than using your WiFi or Bluetooth.
The final piece in the puzzle is for the 5G providers to do their bit, by providing adequate in-home coverage, and competitive pricing options for unlimited data packages.
Right now, us 30-somethings are amused by our retired-age parents who balk at the very idea of giving up their landline altogether. However, I suspect that in another 20-30 years, the young’uns will find my wired Internet connection & distributed WiFi AP setup a source of great amusement.
It shall be my time to balk.
Interesting. Though, it's good to know that at least one of them got it (almost) right.
I guess this is why Three seem to have been particularly vocal about "Spectrum Fairness" when it comes to 4G.
I wonder how it could've been if Ofcom had allowed the O2/Three merger when it was proposed a year or so ago. I guess we'll never know now :(
I frequently experience unbearably slow 4G speeds with Three, despite having a decent signal strength, and a device which can support all of Three’s 4G spectrum frequencies, and carrier aggregation.
My work-around is to switch 4G off, forcing the device back to 3G. Hey-presto, problem solved.
Where I am right now, on Three:
4G : 3 Mb down, 50ms latency
3G : 22 Mb down. 25ms latency
This is the complete opposite to what I experienced previously with EE on the same device. That said, EE were charging me 3x more per month :-/
Let's hope this new strategy fixes the problem nationally.
Virgin Media use their own exclusive network, which is how they deliver the 200Mb to you. You're quite right that the DNS lock-down in their router is rubbish, so you might want to do some Googling on how to use your own router with VM's hub in 'modem mode', which would then allow you to use an alternative such as OpenDNS.
As it stands, ZEN, like pretty much all of the others, are limited to using Opernreach's infrastructure, which in most cases will only deliver around 50-80Mb down.
I do wonder how these complaints statistics would look if ISPs still provided a basic DSL modem only, transferring the problem of crap routers and poorly positioned Wi-Fi to the end user.
Here's how I think those support calls would go:
Customer : My internet is sh*t.
ISP : Try again from your PC/laptop directly connected through the DSL modem. How is that?
Customer : Yes, that works fine.
ISP : Great! It's not an ISP issue. Goodbye.
Case in point, I've been with the apparently much bemoaned Virgin Media for 10+ years at three different addresses and have never been without service (that I've noticed). However, I've always used VM's cable modem, or hub in "modem mode", with my own firewall, router, DNS, and wireless deployment in use.
"My worst fear (OK it isn't really as I am retired) is that the emergency services will be forced to adopt a shoddy system that doesn't really meet their requirements"
If I was past retirement age, I would be fearful of the ambulance service having to rely on a shoddy comms system.
Ah, Orange "Boxed & Ready" - I remember flogging those... £150-£200 one-off for 12 months line rental, and 15min per month included. Back in the days when companies were more interested in capital (consumer buys) than revenue (consumer leases) approach of today.
The first inception included a Motorola MR20 handset, which had key features such as caller ID, and the ability to receive SMS. This was later replaced by the MR30, which had a slightly longer battery life, and could also send SMS. The MR20 and MR30 batteries were indeed interchangeable. Orange eventually upped the monthly allowance from 15 to 30 minutes.
If I recall correctly, the package was eventually killed off with its third and final handset, the Motorola c520, though by that point, pre-paid had become a cheaper proposition for light users.
Considering the majority of Reg readers are supposedly from a technical/systems background, I’m surprised that downvotes outweigh the upvotes on this one...
We know that 100% uptime is BS, so if you can’t be ars*d to implement a simple fallback solution, stop whinging.
Similar to the OP, my primary bank issues Visa only cards. So, I also have a MasterCard from another provider as a fallback for *when* the Visa or my bank’s own systems fail. Costs me nothing (no annual fee), and is a simple solution to avoid the drama.
Avoid the drama, folks xx
I agree with yourI fully support your sentiment regarding more cell sites, but not expanding 3G.
For those who give a feck, they’ll likely have a device which can support VoLTE and all of the 4G frequencies in use in the UK. Most of the folks in this category will feel aggrieved whenever they see anything less than 4G displayed on their screen. They simply don’t need the legacy frequencies.
For the basic and/or legacy devices, the vast majority of these will support 2G, but a large proportion will not support 3G or 4G/VoLTE. Think granny-phones, cheap work-phones for manual workers, and the large number of M2M devices such as smart meters, card machines, parking meters etc for which 2G GPRS is a low power and sufficient carrier.
So, 3G is now a largely redundant ‘middle’ ground, no good for a majority of legacy devices, and reviled by users of Smartphones, tablets, MiFi devices etc who just 4G.
Switch 3G off, and repurpose the spectrum & bandwidth for 2G/4G.
sentiment about more
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020