Really the Author should practise what he preaches
Considering the degree of buffoonery which the author of this 'piece' has managed to incur over the previous years, I would suggest the term 'hack', as opposed to 'writer' or 'journalist'. This 'collection of words' doesn't really carry any weight, and is just a bully piece. I would suspect if I clicked on 'Get more from this author' I would find a big steaming turd appear on my screen.
There was an opportunity to highlight an issue about how people can be misinterpreted, and their knowledge taken as read when it is sometimes rudimentary. However your piece turned into a vitriolic hate piece worthy of Rupert Murdochs arse-lickers from hell. You simply showed yourself to be a very poor writer, and also perhaps jealous of the fact that someone who perhaps has less knowledge of computers et al, still has a bigger following than yourself.
Also, the fact that just about every article you have written which involves Stephen Fry is in the negative: not even a backhanded compliment to be found. However there are lots of websites which seem to call into question your work on a regular basis. Microsoft Media Center 2005?
I'm not a writer (quite apparent) but even I can spot a hack job.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
