Re: You can take my Firefox
Err no, that is just the typical comment from a commentard on El Reg how does not work in the real world. I do and have done starting in IT in 1998.
2486 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Mar 2013
With you except for the barbed comment on ignorance.
It is some Linux fanatics would do well to realise that for corporate uses there is no choice and the majority of consumers there is a choice of Windows, iOS or Android.
They simply cannot deal with the issues of switching to Linux when in reality they are faced with an incomprehensible variety of distributions that their current soft will not run on.
What is straightforward for an IT professional or Linux fan is not for the majority.
What many do not realise when talking about UK oil and gas is that it is very expensive to extract.
There is an assumption because it is "ours" it is cheap. I agree that it would be better not to put money into the pockets of most oil producing states.
Backhanders and doing deals so that they do not pay the same energy costs at the expense of everyone else.
This us yet more if this crap, inept government baring it's backside to apease the orange one and the US tech companies.
Let's be honest, AI datacentres are not and never will be strategic.
Equally who are the completely clues idiots that use them.
With so much of the IoT and wearable crap it really does not add much value except for the people who want to show how up to date and on trend they are.
It is why we are in such a mess with privacy.
This is everything that is wrong on public sector procurement. These huge companies just suck billions of tax payer's money out for poor value. Then when they don't get their way the sue. Heaven forbid if they don't deliver, nothing is the company's fault. I hope the tender evaluation Haa been done properly (documented and due process in evaluation) and Sopra Steria lose .
Whilst that is correct a human read, understood and made use of that data. The sources will have been referenced & credited. Royalties will have been paid when books are purchased.
What the AI & LLM engines are doing is scraping huge volumes of material regardless copyright, ownership or accuracy. These companies have no care for anything other than amassing as much material as possible then using it to spew out dubious answers.
However today email is a very tiny part of that collaboration suite.
It is also the easiest to make work.
Now add in all the stuff people have ( not saying actually use it all) with M365 and you see the problem. We moved from Teams to Slack corporately and it is a total abomination. I was surprised at how much better Teams is in comparison.
Yes in principle, we need to move away from lithium particularlyfor tractionand storage. . Salt batteries are now viable in terms of capacity and size, they just need the volume to reduce cost.
For small portable devices lithium is still likely to be the better option for now.
Lithium is a complete environmental disaster from source thorough to disposal and recycling.
I have a solution:
Simply place a barcode on each fish......
It can be done with apples so why not fish? They just need to be encouraged to swim near an appropriate printer/laser/zapper to be barcoded.
Or better still if you prefer GM, modify the fish so the barcode is integrated from the start :)
You have missed at one group (and probably the most critical):
The people who set the requirements the system has to meet. The same people that either require changes to be made or approve requests from others to make changes.
In my experience this is the group that can derail many implementations. To be fair this was going to be a disaster anyway, it is simply the scale that is up for debate.
This is all down to the insane procurement rules.
When a tender is evaluated you can only go on the information that is supplied and the references included in the document.
You are not allowed to use prior direct contract knowledge or anything that you had read.
This is all so that unsuccessful responses cannot then sue because they failed to win.
Public sector procurement is all about protecting the public body from being sued by the private sector. Those bidding know this and it is why the entire thing is such a shambles. It is mostly the fault of the private sector who see any public body as a source of cash to be ruthlessly exploited.
This is also why it is so difficult to act on failure and cancel contracts, use legal means to enforce contracts and generally get those private sector organisations to deliver what they claimed.
That much of what the claimed is pure fantasy and is only to win a procurement process is largely lost in the noise.
Here in the UK where I live we have the County Council controlled by Reform.
Two councillors have made statements on Social Media supporting in the last 48 hours supporting Trump, ICE and the shooting in Minneapolis. This is on the back of a list of what are borderline unacceptable statements.
This is the same party that gained huge numbers of votes at the last general election with a leading who appears aligned with Trump.
Then we have a succession of MPs defecting to Reform as far as I can see to hedge their bets and ensure the best chance or still being an MP at the next election. The Current PM appears to have no guts in standing up to Trump with the completely one-sided trade agreements and not denouncing the endless rhetoric that comes from the White House.
If people in the UK believe that Reform is the answer to all our current woes are really hope they are following what is happening on the other side of the Atlantic closely.
Who knows, maybe many do think this a good thing.......
In the article it mentions licensing as a negative.
Now whilst I disagree with the way commercial licensing is heading if one is using a product that has to be paid for then it should be licensed appropriately.
If you don't want to pay find a FOSS alternative.
Just not agreeing with a licensing model or cost does not make using the product without paying right.
If you cannot find a cheaper or FOSS alternative it rather suggests that paying is the only option.
The trouble is they have all retired.
Those that are left are at the back end of a career seeing the writing on the wall approaching as young wizkids impress useless managers with bull.
With everything software defined, something as a service or outsourced most don't care about experience and skills.
We are too old and refuse to adapt when you point out failings and see the same car crash approaching that you have already fixed two or three times over the years.
The big difference is that it is proving impossible to bring the Social Media platforms to account.
They are outside the UK.
They have very deep pockets so any legal action is simply a delaying tactic that is lost in the noise of their operations.
Until there are effective ways to actually prosecute the platforms, the directors & enforce meaningful sanctions nothing is going to change.
If I understood one report on this some of the accounts creating this content are actually paying so there is a paper trail to at least a valid payment source.
Good luck to the authorities trying to make any progress on that because as we have seen so many times Big Tech just deny there is an issue or quote "Privacy".
What this actually equates to is that you can do pretty much anything with impunity unless it is so bad they have to take it down (executions spring to mind).
You are confusing two things here.
Linux is an operating system.
Microsoft is an entire stack from the OS up to cloud services like M365 and all the cloudy stuff in between.
I am sure it would be very easy to switch to Linux as the OS, that nothing much would work or you are simply using a web browser to access a US cloud platform makes the OS almost irrelevant.
And therein lies the entire problem with Linux and why it is always going to struggle.......
"Or make retailers sell laptops with either Windows or Linux, "
Linux is the generic term for hundreds of different distributions ranging from huge commercial offering like RHEL to tiny edge cases that are supported by one person in their shed.
Every time this comes up the comments are full of many different versions being recommended as everyone has their favourite.
Are the PC suppliers going to work together and put (as an example) Ubunto on?
If they did even if it was cheaper would enough but them?
We are in the endless loop of FOSS here,
Unless the people who use/consume the FOSS products are prepared to contribute to the development then adoption will be a struggle.
Large organisations want contracts and SLAs. It is irrelevant is that many of the support services are not great, it is a contract.
With FOSS unless there are organisations that will manage contracts and provide those services and in turn also fund the FOSS development we go full circle:
Just screaming "Use FOSS/Linux" does not solve anything if it is reliant on volunteers to do the work.
I agree that we need to move away from the US stranglehold on software and services but unless businesses are prepared to spend that money (or a proportion of the budget) supporting FOSS it is not going to happen.
We live in a culture where people expect first rate software to be supported and updated for free because it is "FOSS" but at the same time spend huge amounts on the likes of AWS, Microsoft, Oracle etc.
What is this to do with the aristocracy?
The other points are correct but you are just doing what is has been bloated by so many on Social Media and the news, all the UK's problems are the fault of "The Wealthy " and pensioners.
This is the owners taking the money and running because the only thing that matters in the UK is short term gain. Now combine that with rank stupidity and general incompetence from politicians and every of value is sold.
The list is endless with names like
ARM
Cadbury
Cobham
I am absolutely sick of websites and self-service portals that have these utterly useless chatbots that are incapable of doing anything. Most cannot even cope with directing you to a minimum wage outsourced "human chatbot" in the Far East.
Everything is designed to make people just give up. Chat Bots always have been and always will be useless, AI is useless and will continue to be because it has been fed on a diet of utter bullshit with no sane person actually checking anything.
The only winners on this route to complete breakdown (we are not far off as it is) are execs that just spout crap to other execs and if not public sector, shareholders.
Another perfect example of just how shite a chat bot/ AI is:
I needed to update my details for BUPA as the title was completely wrong.
I could not do it on the profile page.
I spent 30 minutes going in circles because the "Virtual Assistant" was incapable of directing me to link or real person.
Then I phoned and wrestled with some automated system to try and speak to a human.
That takes me to another gripe - voice recognition phone systems that cannot understand the simplest of answers, What is your postcode "llnn nll" "sorry I did not get that", repeat several times with each response "sorry I did not get that" please try another option. The only other sodding option was to put the phone down!!!!!!
Yet people must be buying all this stuff......
Where I live there is a constant trail of packaging from MacDonalds, KFC & Burger King that has been chucked out of cars.
Although on a positive note apparently a Five Guys "restaurant" in Leicester is closing.
I really struggle with the concept that any of these places are restaurants. You buy a bag of fast-food junk and sit at a table if you can find one not covered in rubbish to eat a takeaway.
Maybe I am just old.......
It is unclear however my impression is that the reduction in orbit is because they are concerned that the debris they caused is increasing risk to the rest of their currently functioning junk.
If this is the case then there is clear evidence that Starlink do not give a flying rat's arse about anything other than their stuff, something that has already been demonstrated. Basically it would appear that they will just keep filling orbits up until they are unusable for anyone.......
What could possibly go wrong.
And sadly the mostly likely culprits to cause that in the first place are the likes of Musk and StarLink.
One suspects it has not occurred to them that with enough debris caused by their inaction and stupidity it also wipes out their services. They already treat the cubesats as disposable. The issue with a collision is the entire orbit becomes unusable if it sets of a chain reaction. It will take many years for the debris to decay out of orbit,
Look what happened when a StarLink got too close to an ESA satellite, they did sod all because they had nothing to lose whilst ESA ended up with no option but move and waste precious fuel or lose billions and the entire platform.
I suspect the wider issue is that by making these contributions all sorts of contractual obligations start to creep in.
Finance and procurement want contracts to manage and use to make payments.
The resulting software or service now has to be legally supported with all sorts of protection for the maintainers and any other staff.
Then add in the usual problem that if one organisation puts in a large enough amount they believe they have more rights and ownership.
FOSS has now left that project.
The crucial part here is "End to end".
If you have the appropriate access at one or other end you will always be able to read the content. If you could not then the entire thing is pointless.
The wider issues surround the (mostly US) security services requesting access.
All providers have slight variations on the same wording.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/reports/government-requests/customer-data
Microsoft reviews every legal demand to ensure it is valid and complies with applicable laws. A subpoena or its local equivalent is required to request non-content data, and a warrant or its local equivalent is required for content data.
Microsoft discloses customer data only when legally compelled to do so.
Microsoft does not provide any government with direct or unfettered access to customer data.
Microsoft does not provide any government with our encryption keys or the ability to break our encryption.
https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/data-privacy-faq/
We will not disclose customer content (see How does AWS classify customer information? below) unless we're required to do so to comply with the law or a valid and binding order of a government body. If a governmental body sends AWS a demand for your customer content, we will attempt to redirect the governmental body to request that data directly from you. If compelled to disclose your customer content to a government body, we will give you reasonable notice of the demand to allow you to seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy unless AWS is legally prohibited from doing so.
https://www.oracle.com/cloud/sovereign-cloud/data-sovereignty/
Read this if you have time and want to increase you blood pressure.
I lost the will to live trying to find one for Google......
First thing is he needs to be sacked.
All too often now completely preventable cock ups like this occur and the response is an apology with no sanctions on any one at the top. We don't know about further down the chain it is also unlikely.
If the results of this stupidity were those responsible being sa ked it proveds a substantial incentive to take more care.
Follow the money,
Although in the case of AI it is a fear of being left behind. I would be very surprised if the energy costs the datacentre operators pay covers the full cost yet they will want first access to x number of MW.
Just like Amazon buying the entire output of a wind farm so they could claim they are using renewables.
Firstly it is not 100% reliable and all that happens is the rest of us continue to use electricity generated from gas.
I am always puzzled by these energy companies that claim all their electricity is renewable. The simple answer it is not and I also suspect that the people being sold it and the resulting usage exceeds what is generated.
People keep demanding that electricity pricing be decoupled from gas costs. I am fine with that as long as those demanding it are happy to have reduced load or power cuts when demand outstrips renewable generation and short term backfill from batteries. The trouble is that they are not. They want a 99.9999 reliable source at bargain basement costs. Not that renewables are that cheap in the UK due to all sorts of other insanity like paying wind farms to no generate.
No back-handers and NHS England will have written the contract that effectively made Palantir the only company that could bid.
Pen-pushers at the top bought into the snake oil that is Palantir, probably with some nice trips to "evaluate" the product.