Interesting, but...
... I hope no-one works out how to make Ice-9!
12 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Mar 2013
Yep, I realise that - although having read the paper, they supplied no evidence that attacks were even possible. Simply having an ECU bridging two buses does not automatically mean that there is an attack there; comms peripherals may be set up only to read frames from the bus etc. (and many embedded processors are very restrictive about re-programming peripherals, such as forbidding configuration except after reset. Executing code from RAM may also be disallowed, either due to processor architecture or MMU/MPU configuration). All 'best practice' stuff (at the absolute, very least, follow MISRA).
Still, best practices can be skipped - see Toyota for example! (Also http://ht.ly/tU5AM)
Interesting quote from an article on forbes regarding this:
"A study released at Black Hat this week by security researchers Chris Valasek and Charlie Miller explored the “attack surface”, or hackability, of 24 different vehicles. The Infinity Q50, which Valasek owns, and the Jeep Cherokee, which Miller drives, did not fare well due to the number of attack surfaces they had. The researchers weren’t able to remotely hack any of the cars, though." (my emphasis).
It's an area which I am tangentially involved in, so I find this stuff quite interesting from a professional point of view too :-)
This is common practice in the world of the professional photographer and their assistants. The pro will choose the location, lens, point of interest etc. but it may be the assistant who takes the photograph. Copyright is still retained by the pro (this article highlights a shot where the assistant got a joint credit - and this was noteworthy at the time)
Not that I would in any way want to liken photographic assistants to monkeys of course...
I was under the impression that Parallels came out in 2006, along with the intel Macs...
The thing that Parallels can do that I've yet to see VirtualBox etc. do is get rid of the Windows, errr window. i.e. Windows programs appear on the Mac desktop. I thought that was rather neat.
Oh, and "operational systems"? I thought this was a tech site...
I found it interesting looking at the comparison table - there's only one machine significantly cheaper than the iMac (and that's the Tosh); the mac doesn't seem to stack up too badly at all - and it has vastly higher resolution screen too...
Still there's the knee-jerk 'Apples are expensive and for idiots' responses. I'm obviously missing something.
I use soundcloud for public demos/sketches (sharing rehearsal recordings and 'private' stuff is done using dropbox) but for actual sales, I go straight to bandcamp.com which is set up for this express purpose. Plenty of stuff on there, much of it free or pay-what-you-want...