quod erat demonstrandum !
Posts by FrogInABlender
12 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2013
Intel and Micron's XPoint: Is it PCM? We think it is
Hacking Trump: Can we not label web vandalism as 'terrorism', please?
Magnet-wobble wireless charging system dishes out a respectable 10 kW
Flash zero-day monster Angler dominates exploit kit crime market
China hacks 'everything that doesn't move' says Hilary Clinton
Protecting users against advanced threats and the human factor
Heads up! If Tor VANISHES over the weekend, this is why
Tragedy strikes Vulture News Central but details remain scrambled
How HAPPY am I on a scale of 1 to 10? Where do I click PISSED OFF?
The Reg's desert XP-ocalypse aversion plan revealed
Final Few Bits
Three of my faves were mentioned once (no comment):
= Bitvise SSH
= Recuva (esp for remotes admin)
= Everything (Filename keyword finder)
Several tools I use regularly have no other entries so far:
> StalledPrinterRepair (clears print spooler)
> Cleanmem (for low RAM PCs)
> CAlibre (ereader reformat & database)
> Mozbackup (for FF)
> Xplorer2 lite (dual pane viewer) ... esp useful for selective low-tech backup
> MoffSoft FreeCalc
Thanks for doing this ... it's been helpful to me both for new utilities & confirmation of my existing toolkit. (Probably also pretty useful for the target community !)
Best regards to the whole team.
JimBob (Montréal)
Have you reinstalled Windows yet? No, I just want to PRINT THIS DAMN PAGE
Hacker who helped find Steubenville rapists threatened with decade in prison
Re: How ironic
I have been aware of this type of "cooperation" between Canada & USA since 1982. It amounts to a "back-channel" request by one party to have the other make a "challenge" request for a "person-of-interest" ... the 2nd ("challenge") request is the 1st official request & seems to originate from outside the jurisdiction that is "blocked" from wiretapping or whatever by lack of sufficient evidence of probable criminality. Having the request come in apparent good faith from a "friendly country" carries with it the ASSUMPTION that the (seeming) originator DOES have sufficient evidence to make the request ... and off we go !