* Posts by JLV

2252 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013

Ohh! The PRECIOUS! Give it to uss. We WANTS it: Shiny iThings coming in 2014

JLV

Apple TV... meh

Not sure what that TV would be like, but I have a sneaky feeling there'd be all sorts of limitations about where you can source your media. Apple will _really_ struggle to convince me that their TV would not lock my media purchases onto their platform.

I do have a fair bit of Apple kit. The phone and tablet are locked down, true but apps are, mostly, cheap. And it always played MP3s (looking at you, Sony).

The laptop is actually pretty happy about accepting all sorts of open source stuff, via Ports. So, overall, the program ecosystem is open enough for me (yes, you can disagree, just stating _my_ preferences).

Media-wise, not so good:

No BluRay when it came out - St. Jobs has decreed iTunes HD is the way. iTunes doesn't do mp3. Who knows what format a movie is in if I buy it from Apple?

Bottom line:

Most of my media is ol fahioned DVD, CD and BluRay, but if I bought media from iTunes I'd be locked in.

Buying movies and music does not come cheap. And, unlike my intentions for computer programs, I certainly hope my movies will play 20 years from now. Who knows if Apple will still be around by then? Probably, but no guarantee I'll want to use their gear by then.

You like iPads, you like things called 'Air'. You will LOVE this puppy

JLV
Thumb Down

re. Tablets will always be a casual games ghetto

Hmmm. To each his own.

I have a PS3 and an unused Wii. I also had an Xbox gen 1.

My background is hardcore wargames, strategy and FPS or RPG. Much prefer turn-based over real-time in most strategy/wargames. Past games: early Civs, Steel Panthers, pretty much the entire Total War series, Barbarossa, Quake. Most of these were on PCs.

There are excellent games on consoles (I mostly like RPGs). But they do not really correspond much to what I like on PC games. Tablets have a better chance to evolve in that direction.

The problem as I see it is the limited way a console allows you control things quickly. You can run, turn and hit action keys very well.

You can't really aim quickly like you would with a mouse pointer, nor can you navigate complex menus to check/activate items, or group select units. Forget the complex commands you can have with keyboards. So there are whole categories of games which drop out of consoles, though there are other categories that are best on consoles.

Btw, a similar problem happens when people try to use a TV/console to surf the web. It sucks, because of the controls.

Civ on a tablet (iPad in this case, but it could be a Samsung) is much less dumbed-down than Civ on a PS3. Battle Academy is a fairly challenging turn-based wargame. Total War is stripped down, but not an easy game to beat.

The price of tablet games IS casual, sure. And there are plenty of stupid games on tablets (Unhappy Volatiles comes to mind). But tablets come closer to delivering a mouse/keyboard combo's fine-grained UI than a console's controller or a WII/Kinect. For the games I like, that's an edge.

Just because it ain't got fast graphics doesn't mean you can't code a clever game. Quite the contrary in fact - too many classic games are mangled when the focus is only on graphics.

Internet Explorer 11 BREAKS Google, Outlook Web Access

JLV

...

- Jim, what are you doing?

- I'm testing Google Search in IE before our Windows 8.1 go-live, boss.

- What? You know that it is expressly forbidden, article 422.31 sub-paragraph c to use anything but Bing here? Or anything but approved Microsoft (TM) services and technology.

- But, boss, lots of users use Google...

- I don't want to hear this. You know what happened to Elsa when she took an iPod to work? Wanna look for a job elsewhere? Get your act together and test MSN, Bing, Azure, Zune and Silverlight, as I asked you to last week.

None of this dallying around on useless stuff. No one in Management is gonna care if Google breaks.

Fiendish CryptoLocker ransomware: Whatever you do, don't PAY

JLV

Re: It encrypts .doc, .dwg etc

>A version control system is a piece of piss to deploy.

Is a version control system really the tech to use for a binary files, such as docs and xls?

I seem to recall git gets binaries, but doesn't something like subversion just store an entire binary file every time there is a change? unlike text files?

Honest question icon needed.

Web daddy Tim Berners-Lee: DRMed HTML least of all evils

JLV
Thumb Down

@BTrower Your arguments, while seductive, are just plain wrong.

No, you are dodging the question. The US constitution which you drag in (odd, since you are Canadian), has little to do with Tim Berners Lee's position or how to remunerate inventors and authors.

Thalidomide, even less and it is a totally specious argument.

You make some valid points that there are _lots_ of blood-sucking patents, copyrights, lawyers & all. Most software patents are pretty pointless and do not create any benefits for anyone. I am with you on that.

But...

How would you set it up so that a normal author or inventor gets remunerated for their work if anyone can copy it?

Not talking about JK Rowlings needing to be worth $100M here.

Say Jane Schmoe author is writing a book. Possibly a brilliant book. How does she make a living in your worldview?

Hey, I know I'd be better off if I could read her book for free. And I know " *all of us*" would benefit too.

But if _she_ has no way to benefit from her work she likely won't be writing that book.

And I think we'd be poorer for that.

Web Daddy Berners-Lee DRMs HTML5 into 2016

JLV

It's an option

and it can be used for good or bad. OK, let's stick to neutral and bad.

Taking Netflix or other media companies. They aren't obligated to provide their contents for free. Nor to rely on us being honest and not pirating. I totally, totally, get that a $150m blockbuster movie is not "information that wants to be free". Established artists and media workers, surprisingly, do want to earn a living.

On the other hand, I don't buy music over the internet because I like to be able to run it as darn well please, once I have bought it. And that includes (Apple), not being saddled with a proprietary codec only usable on some manufacturer's devices.

I subscribe to Netflix, which I consider a much better deal than the $40/month I'd have to pony up for basic cable. If they want to rent me stream-based access and want to rely on some form of protection to ensure they are not pirated, what's the big deal? I haven't bought the film, just rented it. If for some reason I don't like their systems I will not buy from them.

Some media offerings may not have a realistic business model without copy protection. Or, just as importantly, those companies may perceive that they need DRM before they offer those services. iTunes was hard enough for the music studios to swallow, even with the DRM it came with at the beginning.

If the DRM does turn out to be too onerous (which would not surprise me), I will not buy those products. But it's my choice then not to buy DRM-locked products, and I don't see how not having DRM technology available at all on the browser will necessarily increase my options.

If you don't like your browsers coming with DRM capability, install non-DRM browsers, knowing you won't be able to get some services. I will support you in your right to exercise that option. But don't pretend you have a right to choose for me by blocking my options. Choice is where it is at.

In a way, how different is this from Steam/Valve coming to Linux? Obviously you won't playing the latest Diablo unless you pony up some cash and convince Steam's servers that you are bona fide.

Down with Unicode! Why 16 bits per character is a right pain in the ASCII

JLV
Joke

Re: The historical accident of little-endian

>Oh well, it could have been worse. We might have been using Roman numerals still, with no zero, if it hadn't been for the Arabs.

Well then, "intro to unit testing" blogs would all have the obligatory conversion to Arab numbers ;-)

Adobe hit by 'sophisticated' mega hack ransack

JLV

Re: Good advice except that it's impossible

>How are you supposed to remember all these passwords?

You don't. You re-use the same dumb, easily remembered and typed, password for the 50 dumb sites that are just registration-happy. If it doesn't have your CC# number and real email or some relevant s**t, why are you bothering with security on it? Do make a supreme effort and avoid 12345 tho ;-)

Then, on the other 10-20 sites that matter (CC# for example), you use secure passwords, all different from each other, and put them into a password manager. Of course, you never re-use passwords anywhere where it would matter. You memorize your password mgr password and maybe some other key passwords.

Facebook? Pretty useless, but a hit to your reputation if racist propaganda appears posted under your name. So you give it a big-boy password. Ditto LinkedIn. Not the Reg.

When the passwords get hacked on one of the 50 trivial sites, you can run off and change them, if you want, on the others. I know my Reg pwd remained the same after the PS3 hack.

McAfee the man launches 'NSA-thwarting' $100 privacy gizmo

JLV
Joke

OMG, is that a bottle of _water_ in his hand???

Windows Phone market share hits double digits in UK and France

JLV

Re: Maybe I'm just too old a fart and remember things that should've been forgotten...

>but "competition" and "[MS] doing well" just don't mix

Upvoted you cuz I dislike MS and I remember the 90s all too well, but...

MS is bad for competition when it has a dominant position or is in danger of getting one. No danger of that happening here.

It's better not to have a two horse race with Sammy & Apple. You all mostly have opinions about Apple and Apple is in the premium, spendthrift if you prefer, end of the market. There is no telling what exactly Sammy would be tempted to do if it were the only big player in the mass market.

At minimum, a decent Nokia showing on budget smartphones will tend to drive prices down for the other two. Potentially, the same impact MS has on the database market - not great, but cheap, drives Oracle price down.

And, possibly, some of what Redmond is up to will include some innovations. Haven't used WinPhone, don't plan to, but the tiles sounded innovative (in principle). And that Nokia camera tech is nifty too, tho it could have been done on Android Nokias. They employ a lot people and are dumping Ballmer - something's bound to bubble up.

The only big loser from MS being around is Blackberry, which is too bad. I just missed buying a Z10.

Windows 8 fans out-enthuse Apple fanbois

JLV

Re: Win8 is a bloated piece of shit.

So... anything your royal highness is not using is a piece of shit, basically? No explanations necessary?

Oh, do grow up.

I realize cutting out tard comments like yours would cut Reg traffic by 30% but I sure wouldna miss them.

The reason fanbois get no respect is precisely because they act like you.

Apple, AT&T settle 'bait and switch' iPad 3G data plan lawsuit

JLV

Inquiring minds want to know...

This is US-only, right?

Google FAILS in attempt to nix Gmail data-mining lawsuit

JLV

Privacy expectations - differences between gmail and non-gmail users

I think Google's point is partially quite valid - I signed up to gmail fully knowing that I'd get ads on it. I don't look at ads, so it's a freebie to me. Even if I did, it'd still be my choice. I value the quality of service, functionality, as well as my expectations that they will not go out of business and that I can change ISPs and conserve my address.

Re my expectations of privacy, they are actually a fair bit higher here. I know exactly what Google does their scans, they serve me ads. What _I_ care about is that they don't pass on the info to third parties who will spam me some more. I can see very little incentive for them to do so, precisely because their business model IS to serve me ads. If they were a pay-for-service with no ads, I'd have to trust them not to try to make an extra $, a very different thing.

(NSA is an entirely different subject in this context and I blame our govs here).

However, when JaneHottieDoe@hotmail.com sends me a torrid email (I wish), I understand that she did NOT sign up for gmail and its privacy clauses.

Compromise: how about gmail does not serve ads when a recipient or emitter is not @gmail? That way, I don't get saddled with the privacy expectations of the class action participants. And gmail users are free to decide on their own, like adults. A difficult concept.

Oh, and keep the spam filtering regardless, of course. Again, must be careful not to throw out babies with bathwater here.

Google reveals its Hummingbird: Fly, my little algorithm - FLY!

JLV

speaking of clever search engines... what's Wolfram Alpha up to these days?

how come Wolfram Alpha still doesn't get fairly obvious queries like "co2 emission per capita canada"

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=co2+emission+per+capita+canada

This gets me the Canada-wide emissions, not per capita. In fact, it specifically drops "per capita", which seems like an obvious qualifier on by-country quantities.

Is Wolfram still hoping to deliver its goal of context-aware quantitative information? Dead in water?

Thorium and inefficient solar power? That's good enough for me

JLV

Re: Slightly fruity comparison

Not to mention that, by definition, something that is emitting a lot because it has a short half-life, has... a short half-life.

Though a lot of people who worry about nuclear power miss that bit, it hasn't escaped military thinking about area denial and/or alternatives to blowing stuff up - if it emits a lot, it decays quickly and will shortly only be dangerous to people remaining in the area for a long time.

Having said, Fukushima has shown us that we need to be way more clever about deploying active-safety reactors near densely populated areas. I read somewhere that the main reason our nuke plants kinda look & feel the same is because they were scaled-up version of the ones first put into subs.

It's high time more effort is put into designing and producing plants that CANNOT sustain a reaction when not receiving active power and control, rather than ones that tend to overheat. Not sure about selling the idea to Joe Public however, Fukushima was by most metrics a big fail, not least rendering uninhabitable a goodly stretch of coastline on one of the most densely populated countries around.

30 years on: The day a computer glitch nearly caused World War III

JLV

Re: Cuban Missile Crisis

The bit that never fails to annoy me is how Kennedy is presented as a great president. He was worse than Bush, IMHO. Though smarter, but that's not a high bar.

A Democrat, he campaigned Nixon in 1960 on a "missile gap" in which had the USSR being significantly ahead of the US. Which he knew wasn't true because he was on the Foreign Relations Committee. Certainly, in 1962, he knew he could push USSR to the brink in Cuba, after he had done put his missiles in Turkey.

Only reason he could push them to the brink is there WAS a missile gap, just the other way around, with the USA being far ahead.

Cuban Missile Crisis - Kennedy.

Bay of Pigs, that's Kennedy.

Then, Vietnam's road to war is basically started by Kennedy, with advisors coming in, though combat units were only in from 1965.

Great guy? Camelot? Hah!

I am not saying anything good about the USSR - they were EVIL. Nor am I necessarily very anti-US. But Kennedy was the most incendiary president during the Cold War and he almost triggered nuclear war because of Cubans removing their tinpot US-supported dictator. We should remember him for that too, not just his good looks and tolerance of the Civil Rights movement.

JLV

Re: I was in the right place at the right moment

No offense to Obama but his was a low in Nobel awards. Why award a _new_ pres this award???

For not being Bush, I guess. There is significant value in that, true, but not a Nobel. 8 yrs on, the only way his legacy will justify it is if he forces Israel to negotiate in good faith & brings peace to Palestine. & Israel.

Wanna lay odds?

JLV
Pint

I know, I know...

>The Americans had a war barely noticed by the civilian population, were never in danger and ended it with an atomic weapon.

Yanks are all a*holes in Reg land. Never do wells. ;-)

Mayhap a little thinkin o gulags, Ukraine 30s starvation & the like is in order. Not all suffering was inflicted by outsiders. That Solziehnytsin dude (I had an easier time reading his books than spelling his name).

The US coulda sat out the Western front after Pearl Harbor. Heck, Japan did.

Big reason Russia bled so much is Dieppe showed the West exactly how much could go wrong & how little be achieved invading Western Europe. 43 was too early to Normandy. & maybe too much effort wasted bombing German cities too, which the UK partook in as well.

With all apologies to the very real sacrifices by Russians.

Petrov, we owe him, big. Had it been real, he woulda been shot & doomed his countrymen. A real man to do that.

F-16 fighter converted to drone

JLV

Re: You never flew a fighter, did you?

>Actual pilots can still dodge AI controlled missiles - why? Maybe one day AI will become enough sophisticated to be able to fight by themselves - and make all the decisions an actual pilot does.

LDS, your arguments are largely correct. But, in what I quoted, you are making the exact same point I think many of us are thinking. Sure, the drones wouldn't win, today.

But, the military does get it wrong, too. Not just your Nam cannons, but also the F106, F104, Avro Arrow (I am Canadian) and the whole interceptor series in the mid 60s. The Tornado and F111 as fighters. The B1. Mig-25. Combat doctrine is often revised when it meets an enemy.

I think that military planners entering into current jet fighter programs that automatically assume you will still be correct 20, 30 years from now are not hedging their bets. Wouldn't matter much if those programs were cheap and delivered today. But those planes are late, thus reducing their window of applicability.

And they are very, very, expensive, lessening our budgetary flexibility to adapt down the line.

A smart enemy may pull off a significant late mover advantage by leapfrogging our technology. It happens. Just ask Nokia and RIM, for example. Or the ships at the bottom of Pearl Harbor.

JLV

Re: And the first step towards Skynet has been taken...

good question. I think not.

First, that would be a big and hefty saline tank, adding substantial weight. Second, you can probably kiss a good deal of instrument/control tactile sensitivity if the pilot is in a wetsuit and the instruments need to be waterproof.

(educated guess below. programmer, not aeronautical eng)

Most important though - the acceleration forces would remain substantially the same. If you are pulling 10g downward in a dry cockpit, you'd still be @ 10g sitting in a tank doing the same maneuver. It's not about keeping your skin/body from crushing into a chair that's a problem - the tank might help there - it's about managing your blood flow. So what's sitting outside your skin doesn't matter much, your blood is still pulled around @ 10g. A pressure suit applies pressure to constrain the blood flow, different thing.

Circling the RIM: BB10 becomes chamber of horrors for BlackBerry

JLV
Unhappy

Two deaths* caused by outdated OS

I almost bought a Z10, definitely sorry to see this happen.

Nokia and RIM relied far too long on milking their existing OS, without doing much about modernizing them. Interesting how you can make the most $ money even as you are sliding into irrelevance.

Part of it was the advent of touchscreens, yes. But another part was that 10 yrs ago a phone was just a phone and its OS was a very specialized bit of kit, with only vague kinship to desktop/server operating systems and a sedate pace of evolution. So the vendor could concentrate on hardware, mostly. Those were the days.

The OS pace has gone up and apps are also a big selling point. To get apps out, you need a productive stack for developers to work it. J2ME just didn't cut it, I guess.

Compare iOS and Android's changes over the last few years with BB OS 7 and system 60 over the preceding 10.

*Two deaths and a near-zombie: MS also slept at the wheel with Win mobile 6.5 and before. They've got money and they have strong incentives to make Windows work on mobiles, so I wouldn't count them out. But if their cash pile had ONLY been the size of Nokia and Rim, it'd be another story.

Hardbitten NYC cops: Sir, I'm gonna need you to, er, upgrade to iOS 7

JLV

Re: Don't see the problem here

Totally agree with you - it makes it difficult, not impossible. But it doesn't have to. Anything that makes the result of a theft less valuable has potential deterrence value.

A $600 new phone is already gonna be discounted heavily when offered to the local pawnshop - "Honest guv, it's me granma's and she just passed away".

A $600 bricked phone may just not be worth stealing, most of the time.

To quote one of the more "clever" commenters hereabouts:

"All that's then required is a way of faking Apple's server's acknowledgements for login traffic running on a WLAN and you'd be able to change out the user name the phone's registered to"

If our local crackheads and muggers were that competent, then they'd have another line of work. Duh!

Apple to uncloak new iPads, iMacs at October 15 event?

JLV
Joke

Awesome!

ARM chips mean we'll be able to BootCamp into WinRT!

Hmmm, seriously, it is nice to have the option to run Windows 7 on my laptop and I can't see how well that would survive an ARM migration.

Twerking 'ell! Google BUMPs and grinds way to another app slurp

JLV

How about a twerking icon?

With this article's Disney-girl Miley as the pic, of course?

Relevance to IT unclear, but could be categorized as "refreshingly bad taste, creatively done".

'British Bill Gates' Lynch laments HP's Autonomy 'botch-up'

JLV
Trollface

>Lynch reckons there’s much that his Autonomy expats can offer young British startups

Like how to flog a $1B company for $10B?

A most useful talent to be sure. Too bad he's not taking on social networking, a sector that REALLY benefits from fluffing things up.

City of Munich throws Ubuntu lifeline to Windows XP holdouts

JLV
Thumb Down

"The idea that rpm and dpkg are anything like as user-friendly as setup.exe is a joke."

Agree with what the OP said - and I do wonder who downvoted him for having the temerity to be surprised at Ubuntu not supporting some older hardware. I thought that was the point.

And I kind of agree that there is comfort in limited choices - for most people at least. Most people do NOT want to evaluate 10 different OS. And that includes a significant proportion of IT-but-not-sysadmin folks. I don't use Linux much myself these days (I'd look at Debian now, rather than Ubuntu).

But your statement that setup.exe and its ilk on Windows are more user-friendly than a proper packaging system, like Apt, makes no sense.

Once you've installed say Ubuntu, the system is able to very quickly install extra packages from online repos, with very limited user interaction. As someone else pointed out, you don't have to deal with outdated CD versions. Or potentially dodgy websites from which you will be downloading and running executables. Prereqs are pulled in automatically.

But, mostly, the beauty of Linux program installation lies in the updates. On Windows, every single vendor packages their own update manager, which invariably loads at boot time, nags you and clogs up your machine. Adobe and Java being two particularly obvious miscreants.

When the vendor does not do that, you are hard pressed to keep your proggies up to date, short of again finding the exes on the internet.

And let's not talk about Windows Update itself, where every other update "may require a reboot but we are too stupid to let you know for sure".

Once set up, a Linux machine is a breeze to maintain. You may not like Linux, and your reasons are your own, but you made a spectacularly poor choice of argument here, dude.

If I had a grandmother, she'd be on Linux.

Happy Friday the 13th! It's Programmers' Day

JLV

One day off? How wimpy!

Where a superset of gov programmers had it made.

For a while, anyway (odd that this relic made it all the way to 2013 imho)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24085742

Canadian family gives up modern tech to live like it's 1986

JLV

1.5 minutes of fame

Saw a write up on this on the local CBC yesterday.

As part of their going back to nature bit, they locked up their 3 flat screen TVs.

3 TVs. For 4 people, two of which are 5 and 2 years old.

Yes, I agree _they_ needed to ration things a bit, less sure what great living habits they have to teach the rest of us.

Microsoft, Nokia and the sound of colliding garbage trucks

JLV

"Number one, we talked about one brand and a unified voice to the market."

So, does Ballmer really think that people would want to buy a Microsoft phone over a Nokia phone?

Purely, purely, from point of view of the brand awareness and respect for Nokia vs. MS in __PHONES__?

I'd like to have some of what Steve is smoking.

This deal may or may not work out, but branding Lumias as Microsoft phones would be a disaster IMHO.

By all means, improve WinPhone and Nokia hardware. Whether or not you like MS, the phone market will benefit from the innovation that comes with multiple big players.

But sell it as Nokia, not as Microsoft. If it gains traction, it will make it all the easier to win the other phone manufacturers back to WinPhone. And there is a cautionary tale in how the average customer identifies with Samsung phones rather than Android phones by Samsung.

Microsoft's $7.1bn Nokia gobble: Why you should expect the unexpected

JLV

roll them bones!

No great expectations on MS executing on this, but it's probably a worthwhile gamble.

Nokia was the only big phone maker that makes Winphones. Having it in the MS mothership means that

- Nokia won't jump to Android (as 75% of commentards typically recommend)

- Nokia gets a lot of money to play with, to sell Windows phones

- MS may get a better clue at designing Win 8 Phone features that users want and has closer ties to the network operators. Nokia may get better corporate exposure.

On the other hand, big acquisitions often tank and MS hardly seem to have the Midas touch. But people, especially super-wise CEOs rarely plan to fail, so that's pretty easy to overlook.

Bottom line: MS spent money to move into the mobile space, somewhere where it has repeatedly failed. Might turn out to be money wasted.

But Nokia is a good gamble nevertheless. NOT doing this would likely have meant MS just giving up on mobile. A dangerous thing to do with a growing market that is quickly outstripping MS's core business and likely something investors would have savaged MS stock for.

My $.02: MS should fire its own mobile-related marketing drones and keep Nokia's who are the lesser of the two evils imho. And Nokia market drones should have less leeway to mess with desktop UIs than the Metro-tards have had to date.

Google goes back to the future with SQL F1 database

JLV
FAIL

Re: I wonder how many countries envy such a query and campaign power

Dude, it's a database article & an interesting one at that.

Your post is neither relevant nor clever.

iPad classes for DOGS offered in New York

JLV
Joke

An idea...

How about training dogs to poo on whatever tablets the owners don't like?

fanbois get their dogs trained to poo on Samsungs.

fandroids pay to have their dogs pee on iPads.

That was a joke. But... seriously, the mind boggles at some dog owners.

Ever seen thirty-something ladies walk their Dachshunds in high-end doggie strollers? A sight to behold ;-)

Pulsars: the GPS beacons of the cosmos

JLV
Joke

Another Eureka moment - Independence Day.

"It's free software that I can run on my Mac laptop with no worries at all,”"

Ah ha, now we know why Jeff Goldblum was able to get a virus from a Mac into the invading alien's computers.

And all that time we thought aliens being Mac compatible was a dumb idea.

Just so you see, the next lot of aliens will be using Windows Phones.

BILLION DOLLAR BALLMER: Microsoft chief makes $1bn simply by quitting

JLV
Boffin

Re: The market gives a clear comment on his abilities

You know, I am wondering about that. He'll have made a $1B extra when he sells them, not before. For now, it's unrealized gains, not money in the pocket.

As an 'employee with access to material information' or whatever the term is for employees with access to insider info, he will be restricted to sell and buy shares at only certain open periods.

So, for example, a CEO can't buy/sell right before quarter results are announced. That's insider trading.

Did he resign during an open trading period? Will his resignation have triggered an "insider knowledge event" that would have precluded him from trading? Disclaimer: I have no idea if there is such a concept or if it applies to this type of event.

Heck, even if fully legal, would he have anticipated such a valuation jump and planned ahead to benefit from it, if that planning was required? As in "I suck so much that the stock is bound to go up so I'll go long"? Requires a lot of self-awareness, that. ;-)

JLV
Headmaster

well...

This is great news, Ballmer leaving. The investors seem to think so.

One way or another this dude rubbed me the wrong way. From chair throwing to Linux cancers to Metro to Office ribbons.

He's an *ss, far as I am concerned.

But regardless of what we think of him, he's NOT stupid in the basic IQ definition sense of it. His wikipedia entry states a 800 on Math SAT. i.e. 100%, no error. Not godlike, but impressive by any standards. And magna cum laude Harvard Math + Economics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ballmer

Good riddance.

Kim Kardashian's bosom pal in bling snatch Instagram unpleasantness

JLV

Re: can't buy you brains either.

Skimming certainly happens, but those financial arrangements exist with other celebrities as well.

Odd that the skimming was the heaviest in Keeping Up With The Kardashians-land, no? Could it possibly be because her cut was bigger than the other celebs'?

YMMV, but I choose blame it more directly on the gold-digging b**ch, not on unknown circumstances. May be unwarranted, but it could hardly happen to a nicer person ;-)

And, sorry, Business Insider, not Consumer Report:

http://gawker.com/5693964/kim-kardashians-credit-card-may-be-the-worst-credit-card-ever

JLV
Thumb Up

can't buy you brains either.

Though methink the watch does fit the Kardashian look perfectly.

One thing that stuck in my mind re. Kim, besides all the tabloid crap during supermarket checkouts.

Some years back, Consumer Reports found, in reviewing celebrity branded credit cards, Kim's version was the worst in how much it gouged its users financially.

Nice gal, to screw her adoring fans, nope?

Japan's unwanted IT workers dumped in 'forcing-out rooms'

JLV
Thumb Down

Re: British People

> Instead of being proud of being native and upholding high quality standards.

There are what, 190+ countries in the world? Taking just the 34 members of the OECD, do you mean that each one of those countries should produce its own... cars? computers? planes? operating systems? walkmans?

As regards employment laws, if your skills are not useful to your employer and the only reason they keep you are laws against laying you off, that is not a good situation to be in, long term. Especially not in our industry.

FWIW, some folks I know who've lived in Japan have expressed great surprise at the number of make-work jobs that are found there. Office tea ladies being a stereotypical case.

Firefox takes top marks in browser stability tests

JLV
Thumb Up

>I'm thinking these Safari 6 results might be from a Mac

Upvote from me. And regarding your downvote - leave it to a fanboi to downvote a simple statement of facts.

Personally, I loathe Safari 6 on my iPhone, where it hangs at least once a day.

It never errors out on my Mac however. Mostly because I never use Safari if I can help it and Firefox and Chrome work just fine on a Mac. Why would you want to tie yourself to Apple when not necessary, even if you do use their hardware?

Safari. Just. Say. No. *

* among other reasons for my loathing is Safari past decision not to support http put and delete methods. A behavior since then corrected, but quite worthy of IE6's "our way or the highway".

12 simple rules: How Ted Codd transformed the humble database

JLV
Trollface

Re: You can store pictures, images etc. in a relational database...

Not only can you store all sorts of data, you can hang arbitrary attributes off objects.

For example, suppose you have a table with a growing, but uncertain amount of fields:

Table Foo (id, bar1dt, bar2varchar, bar3numeric...) where you don't know how many bars you will end up with.

Instead restructure it to hold its attributes in a child table: Table Foo (id) and Table FooAttrib (id, attrid, numvalue, dtvalue,varcharvalue).

Bit of a head-twister, but works surprisingly well if you need that kind of flexibility in your application.

Relational databases do have one very large Achilles's heel however, not mentioned here. It sucks at same-type hierarchies. Parts-of-parts or directed graphs. Say if you want to identify the relationships between parts of an engine. Or a manager-to-employees hierarchy. The standard-ANSI/no vendor-extension SQL to express that is typically hand-rolled, clumsily-expressed recursion, and brutal.

Graphs are also a big part of social networks and this is probably a big part why developers working on social networks, which are after all the most important apps ever (sarcasm), sneer on SQL's unworthiness.

That and Java devs typically can't write to SQL without an ORM doing all the hand-holding so that also proves SQL sucks ;-)

Fooling the AppStore one code-chunk at a time

JLV

Re: The Halting Problem in different guises. @LeeD

>For performance reasons, iOS make most functions available to every app. Apple's static analysis stop code calling the function they say they're not using

OK, that makes sense, but...

How about having a table of "system function points" that the app is expected to call. Call it a registry (eeek, not my favorite item in Windows). Or an ACL. Whatever. Just something managed by system/app store during the install process, that is NOT under the control of the app.

Now, only put in things like SMS sending, contact list lookups and the like. When the app wants to do those things it will call the function, and the system, not the app, will lookup the ACL before calling the function. No pre-provisioned ACL for that function? No play & maybe a call to the mothership that someone is being naughty.

Yes, there would be a cost, but an app shouldn't be firing SMSs at a high frequency, so a 0.1 second lag will not be noticed. For frequently used functions, like GPS or network access => return an access token of sorts (a randomized function pointer alias to the system function would do nicely) - you pay first time in an app's session, not afterwards.

You could even allow the user to defer ACL grant to actual execution time.

Seriously, a granular permission system a la Android is something iPhones would be nice to have.

I suspect the main problem is not technical, it is asking the average iPhone user to have to consider what her app is doing. That doesn't play well with the "it just works" mantra. Just like old style Outlook expected that users just "needed" VB macros, "just in case".

Wouldn't be surprised that a big Melissa/Blaster moment on any one mobile platform will concentrate minds wonderfully.

Waiting for a Windows Phone update? Let's talk again next year

JLV
Facepalm

Re: Shameful Koolaid Drinker

It's all rather odd...

First they screw over world & dog on Windows 8 desktop with Metro in the name of phone-ness & touchy-feely.

Not that I agree with it, but the intent was clearly to prime Joe Average to love W8 phone by being exposed to it on PCs first. Might be a flawed strategy, but it did look like a strategy.

Then they can't be arsed to keep the phone platform which "justified" all that pain up to date.

What are they thinking in Redmond?

Xbox One users will have to pay extra for Skype and gamer-gratifying DVR

JLV

Re: @But Kinect 2 is far more powerful than anything the PS4 has in that space

>Doesn't really matter how powerful it is if no one wants to use it.

I agree with you, but Kinect does seem to be advancing the state of the art in these types of controller. Just like the WII did.

Doesn't mean I will buy anything from MS, much less an XBOX, unless it is really compelling, but think of what an Oculus Rift + a decent positional controller could do if well-integrated into a hack & slash RPG.

Could be Snow Crash all over again, no? So don't knock them for trying.

Study finds online commentards easily duped, manipulated

JLV

Let's put this social positivity theorem to the test...

"Windows 8 Metro is TEH bomb. Best OS evah. Steve Ballmer rox".

Wanna bet that wouldn't get me any downvotes hereabouts?

Do you really want tech companies to pay more tax?

JLV

anything would be better than what we have...

We have the worst of both worlds currently and the status quo blows.

We could not tax companies at all and instead collect more money from individuals' incomes. That might require quite a lot of tax fiddling to accommodate tax brackets and not give some people a free ride. And it might require adjustment as well when foreign shareholders withdraw their gains. Complicated? Yes. Patently unfair? No, as long as individuals were taxed on the increased cash flows coming out of companies.

We could instead tax companies at a fixed rate (preferably low in my opinion), based on revenue location, and actually collect the money. If say, Ireland, wanted to keep corporate taxes low (good thing, imho), it could, but that would be limited to profits earned in Ireland.

That would improve most of our governments' financials. Hopefully (but not holding my breath) those governments would then use the money to cut their deficits, not create white elephants or bribe the voters with useless spending schemes.

However, we do neither of these. Instead, we end up not collecting money, but we do have those taxes on the books, along with complicated, but effective, loopholes. Companies pay little taxes, but we are not all at option a). Instead of company profits being transparently released to shareholders, it is spent employing hordes of pricey tax accountants and playing complex shell games. Those accountants don't create value as such, they are merely the cost of doing business because our tax red tape is too complicated. Government lawmakers are coddled by lobbyists advocating this or that tax cut - all worthy causes, you know - and constantly tweak laws needlessly.

To extend the argument beyond companies, it is the same for rich people. They spend lots of money tweaking their holdings to minimize tax. How about the government simplifies its tax rules and make it so an average intelligence individual can fill out their own taxes? Then bring down the top tax brackets so that rich individuals pay roughly as much as now, but without being able to resort to loopholes or needing to invest in weird questionable government-approved pet projects. Not to mention that capital gains money is somehow thought to deserve much lower tax brackets than employment income - easier to treat them all more equally and lower them overall.

Yes, the tax accountants and lobbyists do well out the current system and you can bet they'll fight every inch to keep things as complicated and loophole-riddled as possible.

The one thing we emphatically should not do is to allow high-tax jurisdictions to level the playing fields upwards by having every country bring up its taxes. Long term, the less tax is needed to fund deserving services, the better so inefficient countries need to solve their problems, not export them.

My exposure to the downside risks this article warns about? Probably some, but hardly a reason to keep such a dumb system the way it is.

US Navy robot stealth fighter in first unmanned carrier landings

JLV
Facepalm

Re: JLV JLV phuzz

>The DF-21 is not the first time someone has thought of using a nuke-tipped missile to blast a fleet

The whole point of this _new_ Chinese carrier-threatening approach is that is NOT using nukes.

Does it work? Can it be countered? Who knows, but how can you write this rebuttal and not be aware that the _primary_ characteristic of this weapon is that it does not rely on nukes?

If you don't even know that much, do you expect me to take any of your other arguments seriously? Really?

WAR ON PORN: UK flicks switch on 'I am a pervert' web filters

JLV

"Errr, Harry, why did we opt out of that filthy porn smut filtering?"

"No, Jane, it's not what you think, I can explain."

Not really kidding about that, there are societal impacts beyond the imposition of a probably useless censorship scheme. If the missus (or man o the house) aint putting out, should I be banned from self-gratication? Perhaps best for a couple, but should the govt get involved? Methink not.

Violent crime is mostly trending down in the West, but you'd not know that from looking at laws seeking tougher and longer sentencing, would you? Or THIS kinda child security theatre.