Too cool
I love everything about this.
Wonder if he's willing to sell it lol
BGM: Uranium - Radioactive Man (Keith Tenniswood)
49 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Jan 2013
It never will be your desktop either.
It's their creation that allow you to use, updates do and will continue to break changes you make. Themes, plugins, etc are all seen as non-standard and so are never a concern for them and will never be thought about when the next version is made.
Glad I binned off Gnome when they binned off classic mode.
Hyprland or xfce is all I use/need now, can't wait for the time I can bin off other straggler apps made by gnome.
I like this and it is better than nothing but...
What happens if some script that ends up on your machine and just runs pip to install something ?
If this can only protect if called with 'sfw' then it's only protecting the user/admin from mistakes, I'd like a way for this to be an automated system wide things that doesn't require you to use the 'sfw' command
"Isn't this the basic problem? Present that comment to a average user and they'd look at you blankly. Present a USB install of win 11, stick it in the hole and go (give or take signing your life away) and away you go. Choice and variation across what seems to be "Linux" causes basic confusion.
There just needs to be a core install system that is extremely similar across all distros with no big user decisions or distros to decide on - just "Linux".
Everything "tweaky" should be built out from that core *if you want it but it is not necessary*. At the moment, user decisions that impact the basic system happen far too early and are far too confusing for general use.
Windows is currently a turtle, laying on it's back and desperately waggling it's legs in the air, but user confusion is not allowing Linux to take advantage of that situation. Indeed the desperate desire for difference may result in the Linux community directing users to turn over the turtle ..."
Linux/BSD currently is still not "For the People" in their raw forms. Many don't even know what a filesystem is let alone what one to use.
"Users" get good access to it on specific platforms:
PlayStation(BSD)/Steamdeck(Arch) = Gaming
Android = Phones/TVs
WebOS = TVs
WindRiver = Desktop Phones, Routers
SwitchOS(Debian) = Network Switches
PanelOS(Ubuntu) = FastFood ordering boards and menus
That's where it currently ends because if you want easy to install then you need to go find it because distros are not democratic and are made by a group that want a collectively agreed end regardless of "The general public"
Windows is Windows and Linux is Linux, Compare all you like but realise Macs don't need an installer because the OS is there, same with phones, TVs Game consoles etc.
You might want a Windows install experience but you're not gonna get it, it will be different because this is Linux not Windows.
The sheer volume of choice Linux offers means it will always be fragmented and this will ultimately add complexity to the installation method used which also means it will be very different to installing Windows, People need to understand and accept this.
That was NOT a fallacy, In 2015 to install Arch you was in terminal like it or not.
Whether this is or not for the "user" in 2025 is mute, distros are not a democracy. They are what they are and you pick what YOU want. If you want a simple to install distro then go find one.
It no longer maters what you were using back in the day, I began on a zx81 and I know for a dead cert that experience was not for the people of the 80s either!
I've been using linux since Sarge 3.1, jumped a few distro's then stayed on ubuntu until Gnome classic popped of then jumped to xubuntu.
Once I was confident with linux and all things terminal I then made a VM running Arch, Installed that a few times to get the hang of that then lived in there for a few months to get the quirks out the way and then finally moved over to full on install.
Never looked back and have finally settled in hyprland on Arch with xfce as a fallback if wayland gets all weird
my hostname is arch-btw
live the meme :)
This for me just sums up why I still dual boot with Windows.
My son relies on accessibility features so it's just easier to keep windows present on the box and the default boot entry.
Everything fundamental to the system is a coin toss as to which way it will go.
Politics and philosophies seem to be the controlling factor followed by clear business interests and then the over arching rule of RedHat.
The Freedom of choice that is offered is veiled and it's expected that "If you want choice then recompile!", This is NOT the way of your average user and is the reason the "Year of the Linux desktop" will never happen.
Sorry for veering in to a rant but the reasons for this fork are all the things many "users" don't care about and are also why just bloody coding grinds to a halt because xyz was not discussed.
If the lead dev wants to dress as an elephant with 1 leg out of the window I really do not care and I'm sure the rest of contributors don't as it has 0 impact on the code they create, if it does their focus is clearly not on the contribution so stop your internal dialogue that is telling you it does!
All of those things in Brave browser can be disabled.
The referral thing was stopped as soon as it was noticed.
Good luck on your beliefs on how the code base is run.
Hint: it's open source and on github for a damn reason,
Clue: contributors
Your biases against brave are blinkered and I can respect that, as much as I disagree with all the points you make.
Wrong.
Brave has a github repo where you can audit the code changes they are actively making to chromium.
Simply put it is far more than what you class as a "wrapper" around chromium.
If you don't like or want to use it that's fine but if you're gonna slate it at least be correct and also try to keep your dislike of a browser separate from your dislike of a person.
I gave up on CMS, and other frameworks and just use Hugo or Jekyll where possible. Once you get used to how it works and you're set on the theme all is well.
There really is no need to use some whizz bang fancy framework if all you need is a simple site to give a message or point customers to relevant portals and contact details.
Add to that the ability to spin it up in a docker it just becomes a very lightweight, naturally secure no brainer change.
Hate to be the one but...
What were you expecting?
Someone already pointed out that Goog has bizarre ToS and M$ clearly want more control and reliance on their cloud but whilst they see line go up they restrict what you get whether your a customer or a partner.
This is also why if you dig into their AZ exams all it is is a collection of lessons into learning all their marketing names and tricks, you can see what their future goals are with the training they provide.
How long until you're charges to login to the azure portal and then charged for the time that session is live? Then when that is in place and accepted this will be the model for the OS you have on your PC that you purchased, You'll sign in and then the timer ticks.
You know it ultimately coming but everyone needs to sign up !!
Since ESXi became subscription based many cannot budget for that and so many (like my employer, a large disti and service provider in the IT channel) have moved from ESXi over to proxmox.
For us this change was relatively painless and now proxmox provides a full migration feature which made the process even faster.
This whole thing should never have happened and just shows how deep into deception our public services will go and how far our Government is willing to back them up.
The compensation scheme is also rigged to pay-out as little as possible and only in the most explicit of scenarios.
We can also see a similar situation brewing up with Thames Water and others because they've just taken all the money for decades and done nothing but pay-out huge bonuses for box ticking.
All the time people say: "I've got nothing to hide as I don't do anything wrong" and then agree with their Gov. Who say: "We need lawful access to encrypted connections" Privacy will continue to be degraded to the point where anyone can get what they want regardless of you. Add to that the tracking adverts and targeted profiling you see a picture of degraded privacy even clearer.
Then in the UK we get news that NHS techs are in talk with other companies to sell our health data for a profit and you then get an even bigger picture that privacy has no hope of ever getting promoted.
I could continue but I'm sure you already have some flippant statement to knock down what I've said...
I wonder if they'll stop trying to demonise tor/i2p and encryption in general now?
Many try to say that tor is the home of kiddy porn and drug markets but the reality is that any one can spin up a website that does not require a DNS address or even allow ANY search engine to crawl it which just means you keep it online for a fixed period, share the IP among the relevant group to get what you want. If you were able to track these sites it would scare you to see the sheer volume of sites like these that pop up on the "normal" internet.
As other have said previously, "It's easier to hide in plain sight than many think possible as they're to preoccupied looking for cloaks.!"