USB
It stands for "U Sodding Bastard". Or at least that's what I usually end up calling it.
1433 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Dec 2012
Is there some company somewhere who specialises in churning out this anti-usability, bug-ridden, flaky, shit software, as used by TV makers, car manufacturers, and all those other bastards who want to saddle consumer devices with their cack-handed proprietary vanity-ware?
We need to find them, and target them with Hellfire missiles now. (Assuming, of course, that they didn't write the missile targeting software)
Microsoft trademarked their store design in October 2011, as reported on the Reg, only that story didn't have all the phony outrage.
I can't be arsed to search, but I'm willing to bet every retailer of any significance has trademarked their store design. You'd be on okay grounds trying to shut down a bogus store if you didn't have the right trademarks in place.
So, why all the bogus outrage? Oh yes, because it's Apple.
Is there any way we could reshuffle the electoral boundaries so that all the Daily Mail readers are moved to (say) the Isle of Man? They can they get on with being the United Kingdom of Leaving-the-EU-maintaining-the-special-relationship-with-the-US-peeking-out-from-behind-their-lace-curtains-and-fearing-anyone-different-land, while the rest of us crack on and enjoy life.
Not only that, but you'll have to write bespoke adaptors to plug into their common Performance Dashboard which they've built themselves using Cool Tools. They haven't yet twigged that their habit of using reinventing the wheel condemns every one else to bespokery. Whatever happened to off-the-shelf?
The Cabinet Office has so far delivered:
a couple of purchasing frameworks that have generated less in savings than they cost to implement;
a refresh of the government website aimed at removing any vestige of control from departmental subject matter experts;
and, a set of digital policy documents that list all the things departments planned to do anyway, before Cabinet Office stuck its oar in.
(Hence Cabinet Office's attempt to claim undeserved credit for DVLA's digital efforts, for example)
Far from streamlining and shrinking purchasing agreements, they have instead added an extra layer of bureaucracy , making the whole process more expensive and inaccessible to their cherished SMEs. In return, the big consultancies have wasted no time in employing a bunch of ex-Whitehallers skilled in telling Cabinet Office what it needs to hear.
What the Cabinet Office has so far excelled in is a massive campaign of self-aggrandisement to cover a complete lack of delivering even the smallest project, of the sort that government agencies routinely and successfully deliver (yes, it does happen).
Their endless meddling, along with their complete lack of any useful experience in large-scale procurements or development, has made the most hated department in Government Their first attempt to deliver something significant will be the Digital Identity initiative. It's fair to say that the rest of the Civil Service is not wishing them good luck with this.
Decode the Maude-speak about better customer service and what it really boils down to is making call centre and back office staff redundant, and if you, dear customer, can't use the internet, well, tough luck.
Looked at in that light, if Universal Credits crashes and burns, less money gets paid out to benefits claimants – talk about snatching a manifesto-commitment from the jaws of failure!
"Once every six years Apple adds an additional week to the first fiscal quarter to better align fiscal quarters with calendar quarters. Apple's fiscal quarters are usually 13 weeks in length. "
http://seekingalpha.com/article/318471-apple-s-monster-quarter-will-deliver-monster-sized-results
Surely not! The NAO needs to drop it's negativity, get with the digital programme and cease this awkward truth-telling immediately.
Roll on the happy day when the Government Digital Service gains control over NAO's web publishing and can bury its reports in a deep digital dungeon.
"These effectively scatter the incoming light to distort the object – making it appear smaller – and create two “ghost images” on either side of it"
Can I be first to patent its use as a fabric for fashionable clothes?
"Does my bum look big in this?"
"Nope. All 6 of your buttocks look remarkably pert, but the 4 outside cheeks look a bit fuzzy"
MEMs speakers might be OK for earphones. They won't be much use for filling your living room with bass - unless he's imagivisioning a flat panel speaker covered with millions of the things.
Also, the cochlear-measuring adaptive audio is going to require something in or near your ear. Won't be a fat lot of use with speakers (where there may also be more than one listener, with different hearing parameters!)
Perhaps he thinks no-one will listen to speakers in the future
In hour house, the TV is on while people are variously Facebooking, Youtubing etc. The TV is just that lump of moving coloured wallpaper in the corner. If it was running a screensaver of goldfish, I doubt anyone would notice.
Come to think of it - don't any of these smart TVs run screensavers?
That's all you need. Fat pipes are the one thing they ain't going to provide, and the office space won't be cheap.
Digital industries don't need people to be physically congruous in a hub. The only reason for building a hub is for politicians to parachute in and boost their cool factor during election year. (Oh and possibly for Francis Maude to install his Savile-style casting couch)