
Re: Poor coverage is sometimes a blessing
Go outside?
I tried that the other day. The construct was shaky, character development weak, but the graphics were awesome. I may have to this more often...
463 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2012
High speed internet delivered as advertised. Within 5% of speed quoted.
An end to shaping or throttling. Sell 30 Mbps, deliver it. Period.
Broadband competition.
An end to any restrictions ISPs place of what brand of equipment is used on our end of the pipe.
...with all the capabilties of the various spooks in the West, the world is not a safer place.
With advance warning the Boston Bombers slip right past, ISIS beheads with impunity, and many corporate and government networks are compromised almost daily. And Benghazi happens, again with some fore warnings...
The 800 pound gorilla in the room is that big league evil, like big league crime before it, assumes that all tech is compromised and use old school manual methods.
On top of that, resources are wasted in the US by bugging AP reporters, and using the IRS to go after political enemies. Many of the *sucesses* touted are sting operations that would never have happened without prodding, by the FBI in many cases...
We need human beings in the field to combat these serious threats, not massive data slurping that has so far been of a questionable nature with minimal success.
That is exactly the problem, the US needs broadband competition desperately.
I have TWC, the countries second worst rated ISP. A merger with the nation's #1 worst ISP? Yeah, things will get better...
Rather than a merger, these two should fight for customers, let's see how that works out...
Calibre is a decent ebook management program, it is less than wonderful for any conversions beyond mobi > epub. Converting PDF is problematic with all the converters I've tried, I just add bookmarks, paginate and clean 'em up. Sigil is very nice for fixing horribly formatted epubs, even the "retail" ones...
"Who stands to gain if Wikipedia slips off into the night?"
People looking for solid, reliable information not amateur written and agenda edited only to get to the real citations at the end of an article?
One could garner "facts" from a WP article just before the editors cleaned up some nonsense and put that BS into a paper. The citations can be dangerous as well.
With all the sources of information available on the web, I wonder why anyone uses WP.
Wikipedia is unreliable, most academics and professional organizations ban it use in papers. Then there is this:
@veti:
You covered most of the talking points - "junk journalists" "democratization" "republishing" "no 'trusted authority'"...
This sounds amazingly similar to the spin that those of a certain political persuasion use when they ask for more internet control over opinion pieces. They suggest that only credentialed journalists be afforded protection of law, a call for any op ed piece to be published only if a "proper" journalist writes the piece.
Reminds me of the type of control CBS used to quiet a reporter recently when her stories ran afoul of the agenda of CBS management. Of Hilary Clinton's remarks years ago about the the need to "rethink this internet thing" and provide a proper "gateway" for information on the net. (she was very upset at the way her huband was being treated by one aggregator, the rest of the press was killing the blue dress story at the time)
Citizen journalists, whistle blowers and even morons have the right to opinions, and the right to publish. Democracy and liberty are messy things sometimes, but they beat the shit out of totalitarian control...
BYOD is a disaster waiting to happen, a question of when not if. Every security practice you have is negated at a fell swoop. Windows machines with UAC set to admin facing the internet all over your network, managed by end users with no clue.
What's to stop a ramsomware package from detecting network shares and then sitting dormant until the share is accessed?
... the moth and Monty Python, then this book is for the masses, not the IT wizard. Any Usenet denizen knows that originally spam was a definition of repetitive Usenet postings, unrelated to email, and had its own formula for determination.
I am surprised that a writer for el reg never heard of the skit and what it means...
Sady this woman has no clue as to how easy it is for a bad person with merely average skills to overcome her "solution."
A case could be made that with the inevitable tuts on neutering her grand plan expanding all over the interwebz that she is actually assisting bad actors.
Terrorists and organized crime already know how to evade detection, soon cyberbullies will as well...