Civil Vs Parliament
MPs can do or say whatever but Civil Service is at everyone's mercy especially MPs.
65 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Nov 2012
No word on who was in the meetings making this decision.
This will handicap development across government l.
As it is government departments all use libraries written to GDS standards and freely reuse fork and take over projects as needed.
This is going to be counter productive and result in slower and less secure apps
Who benefits from this?
I can imagine certain vendors being in favour of this got sure.
We paid for this stuff, it should not be closed.
One engineer, 1 million lines a month.
Well thats incredibly stupid, there is no way they can understand what they are doing.
The rule some open source has that contributors must understand what they commit is a solid one.
Absolutely reckless of microsoft to gamble the company like this.
Since they are so keep to deprecate win32 they could do worse than MIT licensing all the UI parts of Win32.
Wine could adopt those and Microsoff giving a pathway for legacy software.
Microsoft could stick with WinUI or whatever Teams etc are built in, if seems like the direction they want to go in, and they seem to be letting go anyone that understands how any of their native stuff actually works.
It used to be very easy to learn new windows software
Hold down alt to see the shortcuts to get into the menus, go into the first menu, navigate and see all the options.
Hold down alt, and mouse over all the icons and see the shortcuts.
As well as this, the menus listed the keyboard shortcuts and corresponding icons, so you could build a mental model of what is where.
Every few years I check the OSFree project
http://www.osfree.org/
No updates since 2020 or so, but in the length of this project not so bad considering how long they have been going (I think there were 5 year gaps before).. I'm semi suprised that on downloading an ISO and booting in a VM, it does.. well, something??
The "science behind the laffer curve" is putting things a bit strongly, it's a theory, but not a theory in the scientific sense - there is limited empirical evidence - I look forward to a day where we evidence based economics enters the mainstream, but we are not there yet.
Accusing the other side of "wishful thinking" and presenting an unproven theory does not make for a strong argument.
In the Gov department I'm in contractors have been offered 2 year contracts on perm pay, I'm not sure there will be any take up for this.
The pay cut would be at least 30%-40% for the current contractors that are inside IR35, who have already taken a cut of 30-40%.
BigCO I'm working for loves beuracracy, so I don't think it's that.
Most of the contracts I work on are to build a specific thing and bugger off.
People like to bring in extra people to make something and their option now will be to use other countries.
Where I work there are teams in China and India, it just means less dev work will happen in the UK.