Re: Selling printer ink- HP's new business model
I feat that you are closer to the true than any of realize.
12884 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
I'm torn on this habit of researchers posting their work (many with code). Yes, it needs to be available in case the exploit is used but publishing the exploit practically guarantees it ending up in the wild. The Nigerian Princes were so much easier to ignore.
"blocking ... between 1 and 50 sites a year"
Erm, did someone miss the word "million" out of that? Or have the government not been looking very hard for porn sites?
Those in charge of this will obviously leave their favorite sites alone since they will need access for "research purposes".
So it's reading the brain and acting on "certain" signals. I take it that if the mind wanders... to say "look at that store, I should pull over and go in", the car might start reacting? Or "there's that a**hole from the pub... I could run over him."... it could start acting?
Not much out there tech wise so I wonder what the reality of this really is.
I'm reading this and other reports on this. It sure does seem to me that a) one side wants to allow drones near or in airports and b) the other set up the tests to validate the assumption that drones near airports are dangerous. There's obviously two sides with pre-conceived beliefs they want proven which seems to be the norm these days in the political world. What's really needed is some serious independent testing with no pre-conceived notions.
I'm not a drone owner but personally, I wouldn't want to see drones flying over airports.
When exactly did good sensible engineering go out the window in favour of marketing ideas which seemed great in endless ego preening meetings and then were badly implemented in a hurry on the way to the next ego preening session,..
Relatively speaking....around the time that "return shareholder value" became a corporate catch-phrase and started being used in just about every corporate operation manual and press release.
It *is* personally disturbing that the international public rhetoric sounds so much like that being tossed around in the mid-thirties. Are we collectively *that* ready for another global ding-dong that as soon as the surviving generations who remember the last one are almost all dead we are itching for another go?
Indeed, it appears that the political winds are blowing in that direction lately. Not just in the US but in most of Europe also. Is there another one coming? Possibly with purges based on religion (sounds familiar) as well as ideology. These are indeed scary times with certain leaders provoking other leaders and much hatred running amok.
Well.... some engineers/programmers will make a few dollars. Some assemblers will make very few dollars. Sales, execs will pocket big bucks in bonuses and shares. Shareholders will have maximum value returned. All this will make some people very rich and will help make America great again....
However, I'm with you. Reality says... why indeed buy any "electronic" lock? A lock is only as good as the door and framing around it and history has shown that even strongest castles could be taken by a determined foe. Oh, and windows are a big weakness. So we take some precautions and do what we can as total, unbreakable security is a myth. Even sitting in one's house with a loaded shotgun 24/7 isn't a guarantee. Home Depot/Lowe's are my friends...
The UK is pretty much demanding the same thing from facebook etc... censor the terrorists! who knows what it'll be next...
It's not just the UK. It might be easier to name the countries that DON'T suck up all the data, chats, etc. or demand that the companies "store it for future reference".
True but HMG doesn't want to pay and the level of data they want is a lot more than just for targeted advertising.
A new business model then? Pay for targeted radicals.
On the other hand, the governments slurp everything anyway so they already have it. Maybe not slurp everything which is too much to sort through and only pay for what they want?
Back in the '70's, I worked for a large a/c company that published a manual of acronyms. It was something like 500 pages (might have only been 300) for use with government agencies, foreign customers and internal usage. As I recall there 5 pages dedicated to these acronyms in not just English. I wonder what it would look like today (if the company were still around) and with all the computer related acronyms.
I still have my copy, I just need to find it.. the attic maybe seems the logical place.
However, when I was at Stanford, early one Saturday morning a Grad student drove to Berkeley on his motorcycle & came back with tapes of the over-night build of 3BSD.
Tapes? I recall our company using punch cards and transferring them between sites via motorcycle. Right up until on fateful day when the motorcycle hit a pothole and box of cards flew off.... I don't think they ever found all the cards.
Maybe it just me, but I've observed that the louder and more abusive a user is to the tech, the less said user either really knows or the less they pay attention to what we ask them to do. Screaming about "of course I did that, I'm not an idiot" followed by appropriate slurs. When you show up at the desk, they start all over again only even more abusive and louder. Plug in the device, or press the appropriate key and suddenly silence and occasionally a red face. Been more than a few that I would love to have taken out back and introduce them to a roll carpet, a bag of quicklime and some duct/gaffer's tape.
* Dogfighting: Very important to military aircraft buyers, but of little relevance in modern warfare.
Not so sure about this. Remember Vietnam and the F4 problem? No guns. Retrofit for dogfighting. There's still a buttload of countries who have fighters with guns and not the high-tech stuff using only stand-off missiles. The bigger problem is swarms of low-budget fighters verses the limited armament of a high-tech fighter. It's been a problem for defense agencies for decades.
Ah.... cleaners (and building services) the bane of IT everywhere. Our BS department actually told the cleaners to unplug anything when they needed power for the vacuums. We eventually had to change the lock on the computer room and adjacent areas (the IT group) to keep the cleaners out. And no, BS didn't get the keypad lock combination. We had to empty our own trash and someone got delegated to vacuum the rugs once a week, but it stopped the pain.
I simple don't understand why the rules should allow tacking one (or more) distinct, unrelated items onto a bill.
It's been around for a long, long time and used for attaching such things as "pork barrel projects", unpopular laws, and every popular "special interest tax rates" whereby a company's tax rate (or individual for that matter) are granted. For companies it's usually something like "a company that incorporated at 11:15 am on Feb. 20, 1975 in (city, state) is granted a tax rate of XX%. It's surprising to see the crap tucked into bills for "important stuff" by CongresCritters.
The rule of thumb when dealing with lunatics is "if you are not going to act on it, keep your mouth shut".
I was always told that when dealing with lunatics, you have be a bigger lunatic to keep them in line. Maybe the US and UK have it right... bigger lunatics? The NORKs do have one who's in the running for Lunatic of the Year, however.
Any news on the Nativity play? I heard they were still having trouble finding three wise men and a virgin.
That seems to be a common problem in a lot of places.... particularly the "wise men" part in government... from local to national.
Disclaimer: Here in the States. We have one wise man. Ask him, he'll tell you how wise he is.
When I was in the lower VI I once met my Chem teacher in the pub at lunchtime,
I stayed late after school with the chem lab tech, my best friend, and we're doing some "tests" in the lab. The Chem teacher walks by at one point and asks what we were doing..
"Nitrating glycerne." we responded.
"Oh.. ok.". He suddenly stopped and slowly turned around with this pale look of fear. "What?" And then carefully took the test tube and took it outside. There was a loud "bang" when he tossed it in the field behind the school. Surprisingly, no cops showed up, no neighbors were upset. All we got was "don't ever, ever do that again".