Re: Won't work.
Well.. sure it did. The monies paid in tax went into government coffers. As long as the money rolls in, they don't really care where it comes from.
12884 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
I think you're dead on with "ignore" and I'm sure a phone call would be made to check.
As for thinking that NSA broke this, would they be that stupid to give away that they can break PGP over a relatively minor issue? On second thought, it's politics and government doing the Power Waltz.
I would think it would depend on toxicity and general messiness. If it has any toxic* properties, I'm sure some group somewhere will throw an absolute hissy fit. If it's messy and spills or leaks occur, I'm thinking that someone at home will be in deep shit for staining the carpet.
* Disclaimer - Just because it's eco-friendly doesn't mean it can't be toxic.
A university study (who the hell pays for this crap) and a Catholic priest are bad-mouthing Lego.
On the bright side, it wasn't Playmobile or it would be certain that when LOHAN takes off, every country would have an interceptor ready to shoot it down lest it infect the countryside.
Let's see...
Get the techies out. Let those neighborhoods settle back down such that the poor can afford to live there. That equals lower property values and lower property taxes. Also equals probably higher crime rate. The city/county make less money.
Or:
Encourage the techies and thus property prices/values and following along property taxes rise. The city/county makes more money. Toss in the money Google is tossing for public transportation.
If you were a city father, taxpayer, which would you rather see?
The only problem is what do with all the "poor" people.... ship them to LA maybe? <--bad joke but it illustrates the problem.
Let's face it, Greenpeace is targeting something most people don't understand or comprehend... It's their PR department in overdrive. Yes, they should be targeting factories and waste and yes, the Middle Kingdom comes to mind. But donations come from those who can afford them... and that's the US and their ilk. They can protest in the same places they get their donations because of certain free speech rights.
I'd love to see how long the Greenpeacer would last standing in the middle Tiananmen Square holding his sign. While most of the population would be supportive just on the smog issue alone, the poor schmuck would probably be hauled off in the twinkling of an eye.
No, you missed the point. He denies having any "involvement" but I'd say being a customer of any company is being "involved". The more you spend as a customer, the more involved your are. And let's be real... $83 MILLION dollars worth of "property" stashed in an exchange is "involvement". It may not be illegal, but if you put that kind of change into something, a bank, a financial institution, you are involved even if it's just being satisfied that the owners won't run off with your money. If he'd had that kind of dosh in MT GOX, would you say he wasn't involved? How about an $83 Million investment in say... Twitter? To invest that kind of cash requires some re-assurance that it will be safe or at least getting a return on that investment.
So I still see a paradox.. I'm not involved, I didn't run the place, I didn't influence anyone, I didn't do anything except park my cash there for no return on investment, but I want my really big big dollars back.
Interesting points raised in the article. So XP will be around for quite awhile, though unsupported. Will MS seek those machines out and hit them with fees for unlicensed software? Once upon a time, there was legacy involved... the OS needed to be backwards compatible with older apps that business had. Since the Vista Follies, MS has seemed more interested in pushing out whatever they feel like
MS has no regard for those businesses that need to keep records for X number of years due to government mandate. To upgrade an OS or software without providing legacy support should be corporate suicide for them. We had 10 PC's with Win 3.11 because the data that needed to be maintained due to government regs couldn't be used the newer OS's. The app was locked into the original OS for many reasons, the biggest being the app company was bought out and then their product line dumped by a bigger company. The kicker was that periodically our PC's and OS's were audited and MS raised holy hell about those 10 Win3.11 boxes. They demanded we upgrade at a huge cost. We finally just hid those PC's in the back room and waited for the government reg timelimit to runout.
I realize what you and Mahatma are saying. But for the sake of this discussion what if it were the other way.. that he had come out for LBGT rights and some match site decided to boycott him? Ten or twenty years ago, he would have been crucified for that. He did this 6 years ago according to the article and his public statements since then (again according to article) show he's changed his attitude.
We all change. Some become asshats, others good guys. Did he change or just his public persona?
It seems he's changed so, he and his company should be shunned for something he did 6 years ago when he wasn't the CEO????
Nicely trolled....
I think that here in the States, one's personal beliefs are factor in using a product or service. If the management is forcing their beliefs on customers or taking a public stand on them, then yes, the customers have a right to go somewhere else. Chick-Fill-A and Hobby Lobby come to mind on this.
The politics of political correctness seem take precedence over the quality of the goods and services offered. Some companies have a strict policy on management and employees not vocalizing anything "offensive".
The bigger question is "where is the line drawn?" At what point would you not use Mozilla? If the CEO expressed hatred towards certain groups? Avowed that being a member of such a group should be punishable by death? Or would you turn a blind eye and say "So what? I'm not one of them.".
Ok.. I'm trolling back.
Back on the 18th of February, they were looking to make $500 Million their IPO. I'd say they succeeded. Then today's headline is all whiney because they're seeking $7 Billion. Hmm... did someone's ego suddenly inflate?
Given that there's a backlash over their attempt to trademark "CANDY"... I'm wondering if the smart money said "pffffff".
I've re-read several times what people have quoted and what he's said. It's all warm, squishy, give-me-hug-give-you-a-hug buzzwords. If he offers to buy a company, it's sold to him not for expertise nor for giving the company a future. It's sold for the large dollars he's offered.
Just go back and re-read the Zuckisms in this article and then ask yourself: "If I owned a company that produced a product I really really cared about, would I sell it to him?". If your motive is take the money and watch things go to hell from a safe distance, you'd take the deal. I find Zuck even scarier than Google or the NSA at this point.
Why do politicians want to make up a new law for a perceived problem that doesn't exist and add another layer of complexity to an already overburdened legal system. You've already got Judges locking people up over basically a bar room rant that happens to make its way on twitter like the Robin Hood Airport incident. What common sense you cry!
Is this a serious question? Ok.... I won't troll, I'll give you the short answer.... Because this makes them of the "I'm thinking of the children" brigade and helps get them re-elected. Everyone gets a warm-fuzzy from such crap. On the other hand, full prisons keep the prison guards' union happy and gainfully employed.
From what I remember of the ones I saw decades ago in Vietnam, nothing bothers them. Trucks, tanks, machinegun fire, grenades.... nope, it might have got their attention for a few moments but otherwise they just seemed to go about their business. Much the way some people get while texting.
They blew it and yet they continue. Neither Hubris nor Indifference. Probably profit from the advertisements from the flu vaccine and flu symptom drug companies. Yes, I know, flu symptom drugs don't actually cure the flu. Neither do antibiotics but the drug companies make profit from it.
They're fickle. They can pick up a house and leave a baby behind. I would have hoped they had some windtunnel testing or will at least drive it into the path of tornado, run away in another vehicle and see what happens to it before staying in through a tornado. Too many people underestimate these storms.
Not exactly. Well-written comments don't point to a Brit anymore if what is posted here on El Reg is any indication. The Brits do just as much poorly written comments as anyone else.
As for the prices in Sterling... as an American I probably would to based on way exchange rates fluctuate.