Re: Some questions still remain
They (paleontologists) have found what they claim are fossilized dinosaur eggs that look like big chicken eggs so.. probably were hard shelled. Egg sacs disappear pretty quickly.
12880 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
They both have the same problem and the founder/manager/owner bit. They believe the world sees things the way they do and have similar experiences. Yes, knowledge that can be had from the Internet is fantastic, but if you're at subsistence level with iffy power, your likelihood of rushing out to buy a cell phone is pretty much zilch. The other problem is literacy. It takes a certain amount of education to use technology. Many parts of the world are illiterate.
Let's go a step further... they are successful and there's things in the sky providing 100% world-wide coverage. Now the local politics, and not the "who to bribe type". Given the way things are, using said balloon for your information may very well get you shot, stoned, beheaded, or tossed into a re-education camp.
A noble goal but fraught with problems that can't be solved by launching a balloon or giving someone Facebook.
Technology isn't the answer to every problem like some seem to think. If the population is too poor, too uneducated or in middle of a civil war, then it's a waste of time and money.
From where I sit, and knowing that we are the product on FB and Google... I'd say that their business plan is a privacy blunder. Ok.. maybe not a blunder since it's intentional. If Google wants to target me with ads, then fine, target me during a search for a product. Not for days afterward. But that's minor compared to FB and it's active pushing for more info from users and by default, everything being public.
I'm not clear on what one would do with that vulnerability and the article isn't giving me a lot of ideas
Ah... that's probably why you're not a "bad guy" then.... After the various break-ins/hijacks in the US in the last few years, if one remoted in, they would own the system.
And since the PW's have been released, expect new break-ins/hijacks in...5...4....3....2....
Short answer... it appears that it does mean that.
The problem as I see it is that Do Not Call list is patently ignored or subverted. The callers are using number and IP spoofing, even TOR to hide themselves. Obviously it's still big business or it wouldn't be done and the marketers wouldn't be going to such great efforts to hide themselves.
So does this mean that the phone calls from the Computer Service Department telling me I have a virus on my computer will be by a person with either a Bulgarian or a Vietnamese accent? I guess I better learn how to say "Feck off" in Bulgarian and Vietnamese now in addition to Pakistani and Hindi.
Edit: Hmm.... good for me. I didn't bring up Bulgarian Airbags... oh wait...
Oh but they don't invade privacy and surveil you... according to them, they just take the information you freely give them and process it. Er.... hmmm... conundrum.
Hey, El Reg... can we get a dictionary of Googlespeak? After the Google guy at the RSA conference pointed out that words don't mean what we think they do, we need to have them defined and maybe translate what Schmidt said.
Ok. maybe not real paranoia but the attempt to instill paranoia into the traveling public. And why? Is this theatre where they can say "oh.. everyone is feeling warm and safe"? or control? I suspect both... they'll make you feel a bit paranoid, then warm and safe... all the while controlling your very thought processes. DHS caught on real fast with the "no jokes" rule at the security checkpoints and their theatre of water bottles, strip searching babies and old people, etc. Checking through is rather somber affair and how can one not feel safe with steely eyed contractors keeping a watchful eye on everyone...?
I think the FBI knows which aircraft are insecure. I also suspect that there's some fair amount of discussion going on behind the scenes with aircraft companies and probably the carriers. It's obvious that there's much more going on than being revealed just because a bulletin was issued.
Which, upon introspection, makes wonder about the timing... the Patriot Act is coming up for renewal. Is this part of the effort to get the public to demand it's approval?
Ah.. Washington, the seat of power games and money games.... power and control.
I think we've arrived. Pick one but you have hear it in your head with Rod Serling's voice....
You're traveling through another dimension -- a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's a signpost up ahead: your next stop: the Twilight Zone!
You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension: a dimension of sound, a dimension of sight, a dimension of mind. You're moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas. You've just crossed over into... the Twilight Zone.
There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call "The Twilight Zone".
from: http://grail.cba.csuohio.edu/~somos/twizone.html
That will work right up to the point that you double-cross the wrong people. Once that happens you'll probably be wearing concrete overshoes and sleeping with the fishes. Or something equally not nice. Some of these darksiders such as certain Russian groups, really take offense to losing money.
Since what we see from earth is a mix of the history of the universe as far as time goes... the light we see from something 2 million light years away left there 2 million years ago... I'm puzzled by this. As they look deeper into space and find things like this void.. that's how it was, not how it is. Right? Can they extrapolate what "was" to what "is"? I'm trying to make some sense of this... A void 1.x billion light-years across means what they're seeing is a younger version on the farside than the nearside (to us). So..... what does it really all mean?
Hmm..... I guess that's why I'm not an astronomer or a quantum theory type.
They may be very well writing it down and emailing it. This article scratches the surface on how they are changing words and concept definitions to their own ends. This, given the nature of US law and lawyers, will change the landscape if they can pull it off. So, maybe they have learned something. It's like calling a Ponzi Scheme a "wonderful investment opportunity". We know what it is. They know what it is. The lawyers will fight it out.
This may be intended as a good thing and it might work (slim chance at best) to at least slow down the amount of state sponsored activity. Two things bother me with this.... no definition of what would trigger such a response. Another SONY type attack? And there's the "leaving the ordinary criminals alone" message...
Didn't know of that case but that falls under the rest of what I said... to wit: And yes, just because you're not breaking a local law doesn't mean that the John Law of your home country can't arrest you for breaking your home country's laws. Stupid, I know, but it's the way they've worked in most countries for a long time.
They broke US law while abroad and got nailed for it. LDS in the post after yours made the same observation.
Having sex with a child in Thailand will get you locked up for years in America.
I think the case your talking about was about an abuser who, when the law started closing in on him, he fled the country. Eventually he was found in Thailand by the Thai police.
And yes, just because you're not breaking a local law doesn't mean that the John Law of your home country can't arrest you for breaking your home country's laws. Stupid, I know, but it's the way they've worked in most countries for a long time.
I think this is much ado over nothing in that nothing has changed except some "legal" (for some value of "legal") data gathering. The Five-Eyes will get what they want when they want it. Depending on the court, their activities might or might not be presented to the court. There's also the stance that if they don't present it, the data slurp never happened, in the eyes of the court.
I would presume that there's no such thing as a secure internet. You post something, you buy something, anyone can find it if they have the inclination. There's good guys and bad guys and sometimes it's just a shade of gray.
proposing a high-speed link between America's capital and New York City. Were that to happen it would reduce current travel time from about four hours to under an hour
But given the nature of the US politics, etc. there's a couple of problems:
1) Land costs would be out of this world. The east coast is heavily built up and there's a lot of prime real estate on anything approaching a direct route from DC to New York.
2) Every politician would immediately start squabbling over where it would run, who would be in charge, and adding stops, etc. for pork barrel projects.
3) This same group would also mire it down in "safety regs" and testing and making sure the public couldn't wander onto the roadway/track.
4) Oh yes environmental impact statements including any wetlands, etc. And the added impact of additional power generation.
4) Depending on who got the various contracts, cost overruns would be horrendous.
5) Lastly, the trip might take an hour but Homeland Security would want to be involved so add at least 1 hour or more for "security screening".
If the damn bureaucrats and politicians could see fit to keep the lawyers out of it and their own selfish interests out, it might just have a chance.
Dan, go back 20-30 years. Remember the "get plastic bags and save a tree" campaigns they ran? Now it's back to "use paper bags because the plastic ones don't decompose". The Greens really have no clue of which they speak. It's pure emotionalism and logic goes out the window.
This whole thing about e-waste is interesting and seems to be fraught with scare tactics. I see they're lumping different appliances including vacuum cleaners and laundry appliances into the mix. By the time, say a washer is stripped of the steel and motor, which they do, there's not much left in the way of electronic componentry. Even toasters are now tossed into the scrap metal pile for melting down and re-use.
Given what they're calling "e-waste", it looks to me like they're trying to inflate the numbers....
You raise many valid points. Even physical defence is harder than offence... thus the basis for the MAD philosophy of the Cold War era.
I find it interesting that the likes of NSA, GCHQ, et al, are not assisting our critical infrastructure in testing. Penetration testing seems to be the bailiwick of private firms and I would think they don't have the tools of the big 5. Rogue states are a problem just like the rogue terrorist... unpredictable in when and where they will strike. OTOH, I can see why the big 5 are not doing this since there's so damn many companies that would need to be tested.
If so it could make privacy protections in the EU a race to the bottom.
Indeed it already is. What I see is "legalizing" what's already being done. The cases making the media were/are, at least from the media reports, variations of old-fashioned police work. They get a tip (usually an FB post) on someone and then investigate.
I would think that if they want these invasive acts to be approved by the general public, a bit of PR would be involved. Such as, we found via the data collection..... But they don't.