Re: .
Well-played, sir.
12880 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
I'll give you an upvote. Yes, he has a snowball's chance in hell... but not being beholden to any interest other than his own... this will be an interesting election. It could be that rather than picking Trump, the masses will go for Sanders who seems to me, to be a pretty good choice compared to the other idiots.
Hmm.... I sound like I'm picking the lesser of evils, doesn't it?
Thanks for that info. I guess we should expect the other insurance companies to get tagged also.
Oh yeah... I'm well aware they own us. Along with everyone else. I'm also suspecting that Chinese may have actually been behind the supposed Nork attacks since their Internet goes through China.
You might be right but power on the ground is usually a big problem during a disaster and not many places have a reliable UPS that can run more than a day. Contacting any kind of emergency services is also an issue. I would hope that they have a plan for this....
On the other hand, if he's only feeding his Internet.org or FB, then there's a problem.
Interesting concept, but if as a civilian, you don't really need one of these sights. I seriously doubt home-defense or even sporting hunters would ever use one because of the a) the cost b) the effectiveness a longer ranges (which isn't home defense) and for the hunters, they want c) bragging rights.
As for the so-called hack, I'm wondering who paid them for this? The TrackingPoint company? The anti-gun side of politics? Or.. maybe the defense department or LEA's in a moment of worry about civilian snipers?
Overall though, Lewis is spot on about the hack and the capabilities of the sight.
One of the fun things might be to process all that data the NSA has collected... and once they cut back, process all the data they get from what the 5-eyes will collect and give to them. There has to be a serious amount of data there.... possibly even more than "aerodynamic testing".
I think they've learned very well... This is obviously a smokescreen for something else. Politicos do that you know.. sorta' like those doing magic tricks. He's re-directing your attention so won't see him put the rabbit in the hat for him to pull out later. The bigger question is "what is he not wanting you to see?" and chances are, it's not tits.
I'm not sure "height" is the requirement. Most cities do regulate how high a privacy fence can be however.
Where the gray (grey) area is with multistory housing. If you're looking in a window, say across the street with binoculars, you can be arrested for being a Peeping Tom. I'm assuming from what I've read, that this is problem with the drones.. fly along slowly and photograph the inside of apartments, etc. I would think this principle could be applied even on a single floor unit.
If I put up a privacy fence, I have an expectation of privacy from the "normal" view. Drones violate that "normal" viewing.
I believe that with a 6-foot tall (~2m) privacy fence there is an expectation of privacy. It it's was within range of the shotgun (50 yards/50m maybe?) then yes, it's too low. Then there's the idiots who decided to go hassle the guy with the gun... They did do the right thing (for some value of right) by calling the cops instead of trying to deal with him. But this also gives the courts a chance to intervene and lay out the interpretation of the law.
If he loses, then I guess we can expect these intrusions at the will of the owner without regard for our safety or privacy.
Well duh... data centers, balloons/drones/pie in the sky with free internet, data centers, Zuck's Idea of the Week (TM pending), (did I mention data centers for all that data being collected and stored and monetized?) cost money.
If FB ever sees the likes of Elliot or Icahn, there will be a fire sale and much bidding over the server loads of data. I suspect that even Google would get in on the bidding for the data they don't have.
Interesting. I thought the same way you do, but Wheeler pointed out that it does apply to them also. I knew the "Do Not Call" list didn't apply to politicos, charities, and couple of others.
Personally, getting a robocalll from a politician might just make me vote for his/her opponent. I'm cranky that way.
So.. since no robocalls applies to politicos... when will the lawsuits start?
I suspect several reasons...
Some of the ones that don't have it, other than cost, don't trust it. I can't blame them there. Scams, malware, spying. Enough to scare the hell out of anyone who's rational.
Some of the ones that don't have it, don't understand it. Schooling, maybe environment such as out in the sticks and thus never exposed to it.
It's kind of like some of us who have and use the Internet, but not Facebook. We have our reasons and sometimes, we just can't quantify them to someone else.
I think you overestimate people otherwise what we call "petty crime" like purse snatchings, muggings,... misdemeanor kinds of crime, would be non-existent. There are those will do anything for a shilling/shekel/dollar/etc. and others will do it for revenge or just plain nastiness.
Some things are just unknowns...and others.. who knows.
1) Author says this will not be a subscription service. Is this just for the first year or forever?
2) The App Store... I've not seen anything on costs yet. It would be nice to be able to figure out the cost of ownership including apps.
3) Updates from other PC's on the Internet. Now this is truly scary. What's to stop this from being an attack surface?
Personally, I'm not seeing any compelling reason to jump to Win 10 unless it's for "hey, guess what I've got" bragging rights. Corporate issued out a statement here that "in due time, but not yet" so any corporate devices will not be upgraded and nor will IT support Wn10 on BYOD for at least 6 months. They will let us run a PC's for testing and learning.. so I guess I get to fire one up in the next month or so.
We do a similar thing in our area. "XXX needs physical assistance" or "usually hostile, be serious and not funny" or "not computer literate" or just little notes.. "hard of hearing". Things like that. They do tend to use generic labeling just so the person helping them has some idea of what they'll be walking into. But, I can see where comments can get out of hand for descriptions.
BTW, in many places, "Jewish" is still synonymous with "drives a hard bargain" or "likes to dicker over price". Not about religion.
So the old.. "sure here's the pardon" but afterwards "my fingers were crossed so it's not real" ploy won't work? I'm beyond disgusted by our elected officials and those who elected them. This next election looks to be no different judging from the polls. The downward spiral continues...
As for Snowden, if anyone thought for a moment he'd get a real trial, open to the public with a real jury of his peers, things might be different. Currently the jury of peers is nonsense... the rest is beyond debatable... he's doomed.
This is nightmare, I admit it. To be one who wants privacy and yet, we need to defend against the bad guys. There doesn't seem to be any middle ground here which, given the state of American politics, is pretty damn normal. The art of compromise and open debate with an open mind has long since passed.
“since that change, we’ve heard you loud and clear -- that is too long to have to wait for a download of connection information.”
I guess those whole complained are of the instant gratification crowd, or spammers, miscreats, etc. who want the information NOW!!!!! I shudder at the number of temper tantrums thrown.
Oh, I don't know about "no going Carl Spackler". A small, pressure-sensitive detonation of a small amount of one's explosive of choice might be very entertaining.. Especially for the follks at the local urgent care/emergency room... Drop the turd and it comes flying back at you while scorching various exposed body parts.
911 centers in the States use the telcom ID tech. If telemarketer's can spoof phone numbers, why not anyone else? Perhaps, governments will force the telcom's to take the spoofing of phone numbers seriously. But, I suppose that unless it happens to high-level official or to his/her family or lobbyist, the problem will not be addressed.
...as these crims are unlikely to get any serious punishment.
These are small fish which is why they probably went after them. Being China, who knows what the punishment will be... slap on the wrist? Time in re-education camp? Bullet? The government is just trying to make a point that they're "doing something" when I don't believe they really care. Their copyright/patent laws basically ignore the rest of the world. Hell... there's been Chinese citizens patenting things invented elsewhere and then trying to claim royalties.