Re: no
So, all Wikimedia have to do is to claim that their collection of images provides the same service as a guidebook?
I know a lot of people use Wikipedia/media to research holiday destinations, so it's not entirely unreasonable.
I think you've touched on the big problem with all this. If no photographs of a given town or area that is dependent on tourism are permitted (with or with out a fee), then tourism will dry up. This seems to be more about revenue generation than licensing and compensating the artists.