* Posts by An0nymous Coward

6 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Nov 2012

EU joins Google, hippies, Uncle T Cobbleigh in fight against ITU

An0nymous Coward
Thumb Up

Re: Extra-Territorial Reach

I was the one that upvoted your post as it's the only intelligent and sensible one on the whole of this article!

An0nymous Coward
Holmes

Re: Can we stop this crap....

He used a .com address, he had it coming. and besides, New Zealand has always been the USA's lapdog anyway.

An0nymous Coward
FAIL

Re: Can we stop this crap....

The difference there, is that the USSA doesn't enforce its will on the people of other countries!

The ITU would!

Telcos react coldly to renewed UK.gov smut-censoring push

An0nymous Coward
FAIL

Re: Better approach

some chocolate fireguards are better than others and DNS blocking is just too easy to get around - Any kid will have this sorted within hours of it being implemented (even the none teccy ones can have a quick cheat sheet written for them).

Yeah that's true, but SSSHHH the government doesn't know that. But then yeah okay let's use the DPI method just for the hell of slowing everything else down, yeah that'll work, oh wait a minute.

ANY KID will know how to bypass BOTH methods, DPI isn't that much harder to bypass, and takes a throughput toll on the networks so let's not convince them to use it aye?

An0nymous Coward

Re: Better approach

Ain't all of these methods a 'chocolate fireguard' My point was that if they want to DO IT which THEY WILL, they may as well use the least invasive one, being the DNS server blocklist rather than a DPI blocklist which inspects all requests thus slowing down ALL NETWORK TRAFFIC!

An0nymous Coward
Facepalm

Re: Better approach

Those thumbs down-tards fail to understand why I mentioned DNS blocking.

They would rather they use DPI thus slowing down every Internet access including VoIP and gaming? no thanks.