Technical Writer
The article is good reading, but Ashlee Vance is not paying attention. He/She says: "AMD hands you twice the cores and then Intel slaps its rival in the face by handing you a part that matches AMD's clock rate while consuming less power"
Intel has beat AMD to market with dual and quad-core chips from the beginning, and at lower power, and with higher performance. What more is there to say?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
