You may like nudity, but...
...the nude lab security study may turn you away if you are dyslexic.
811 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Nov 2012
El' Reg proofreading
You say that as if it's a simple job. Sure, when it comes to commercially bottled alcohol one can just read the label. However, proofreading the stuff that comes from the barn at the potato farm requires the knowledge of both chemistry and fire safety.
"People back home cannot understand how the CEO of Equifax and the CEO of Yahoo! walked away with $90m, or $27m, or possibly a quarter of a billion dollars in stocks – this is unfathomable to the average person,"
We understand just fine. The corporations own the government and are thus above the law. Why spend money on security when there are no consequences?
I think a better way to implement this system would be to use proximity sensors to determine the location and velocity of nearby vehicles. Under specific sets of circumstances the computer would send a warning message to nearby vehicles in the form of an auditory "AHHHHHHH!!!" Depending on the severity of the situation different magnitudes of "AHHHHHHH!!!" would be used at ever increasing volumes. The warnings would start with a baseline "AHHHHHHH!!!" and progress upward through "AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!", followed by "AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!", and so forth.
Nearby vehicles could acknowledge receipt of the signal with an auditory "WAAAAAHHHHH!!"
...they exist to pay the gambling debts of your betters. It would defeat the purpose if the rich and powerful had to pay them.
Now, who would like to purchase some extremely high quality mortgage backed securities? Oops, they seem to have turned into dog shit. Luckily your government will be more than happy to purchase them.
Pardon me, I'm going to take my helicopter to my boat (which has a helicopter pad). Both the helicopter and the boat were purchased with your pension money. But don't worry, I'm sure the millennials will pay your pension when it's time to collect it. Surely they will be done working through their 6-figure college debt by serving coffee by the time you are due to retire.
Some $700m of those savings will be plowed back into the biz.
They just announced they are spending $2B on stock buybacks, a clear and effective way to invest in themselves. It just makes sense to fund the company with the money they will save by firing everyone.
Say, if they buy all their stock back does the share price become infinite?
I've heard of "TPM", but never really looked into it. According to the Wikipedia page it's primarily for ensuring that software/hardware hasn't been tampered with. I found this long list of (all?) HP products that are effected by this:
https://support.hp.com/si-en/document/c05792935
So there is a *lot* of stuff out there with these chips.
However, I have to wonder what there is of importance that actually uses this stuff. Under Linux there's a "TrouSerS" library that seems to be the way that most people access TPM, including libengine-tpm-openssl, by which you can generate keys via OpenSSL using TPM. However, it doesn't seem to be generally used. I also found someone who managed to get OpenSSH to use TPM, but again, this does not seem to be common.
My understanding was that RSA keys for certificates, ssh keys and things I generally care about are generated using the normal processor rather than special hardware.
A quick look makes it seem that none of the stuff I use (and care about) will be effected, but that's based on a whole 5 minutes of half-arsed research. Can anyone shed some light on the applicability of this vulnerability?
eliminating smaller risk while doing absolutely nothing about higher makes absolutely no difference to safety.
"Daddy, should you be driving? You've had a lot to drink."
"Do...donworry, cardiovascular disease kills mahr peopl then car accada..accadents."
THUNK-THUNK
"Hab a goo day a school hu...hungey."
I had trouble understanding git before I read "Git From The Bottom Up". The data structure on which git is based is really simple and easy to understand. Once you understand it the front end becomes a lot more comprehensible.
I do find the nomenclature in the git front end to be really odd. The names of a lot of the commands don't sound like what they do, imo.
Another few:
• replace the mouse cursor bitmap with one that is nothing but transparency
• set the Windows "click" sound (plays pretty much whenever you click on anything) to the Windows 3.1 tada sound, then remove write access to the section of the registry where the sound bindings are stored. I haven't done this in a while, but it used to be that changing the sound back would seem to work, but would do nothing
• there used to be a registry option that would force the user to agree to terms and conditions upon login, so you could pretty much force the user to agree to anything
• there used to be a registry setting that allowed the window manager (or whatever it is called) to be changed to an arbitrary program. Also, up until at least XP, the old one from 3.1 was available
• modern Macs have an obscure key combination that will invert the colours. This persists across reboots.
Wow, ribbons are 10 years old now. It's funny how MS's shit ideas of yesteryear barely even register on the shit scale compared to their new shit.
Ten years from now Office will include an obligatory feeding tube connected to a canister of solid waste and people will still buy it. People will say (over the fecal gurgling sound) "remember when the worst thing MS did to us was to monitor everything we did? Those were the days."
Seriously a baby in the middle of the street and you 'wait a few minutes?'
It takes some time to unhook one's jaw and relax one's throat.
"One of my biggest worries of this book and talking about it is: 'Will it be viewed cynically as corporate propaganda?'"
Don't worry, Nad, I view it as a big bag of self-important ego wank.
We're up to what, one of these per day? And that's only the stuff that's important or observed enough to be reported.
I had to use S3 on a project a while ago. The web interface was weird and confusing.
Weird, confusing and security don't mix well. If you pour them all into a beaker they just striate and smell bad.
Fuck over millions of sick people, that's capitalism. Threaten to pull the hair of one of the sociopaths that be*? Go in guns blazing.
Don't get me wrong, anything that puts this snake behind bars is fine by me, it just seems the priorities are a bit off.
* Not that I don't think The Orange One is any better. The world would be a better place if all of the elephants and asses (save a very select few) were burried under millions of tons of silt mixed with radioactive waste at the bottom of the ocean.
"My brother (state-side), states things like 'Ping me' in his emails."
That's when you go to google images and search for things such as "untreated" and "grinder accident". You then fill an email with those lovely things and send it off to him.
If your brother asks why you sent such things you say "you asked me to ping you, that's what means, right?"
If your brother explains to you what he considers "ping" to mean then you reply with "oh, I understand now". You then wait for him to ask you to ping him again and send him pictures of eye surgery and motorcycle accidents.
So does that mean you don't get access to the watercooler if there is no water? Is this just a workplace policy, or is there a physical access control in place?
It's a bait-and-switch and the intern will not initially be given access to the water cooler. Everyone knows that the water coolers at El Reg are only for vodka.