Re: RE: doing things behind the curtain
> Oh, yes. Hell yes!, compared to Linux.
You mean Debian, not all Linux distros, many of which are more pragmatic about things like firmware.
> Users who choose MacOS do so because they do not have to know how anything behind the curtain works.
Until you venture out of the Apple eco-system, and find that some hardware doesn't work as well with MacOS as it does with Windows or Linux. One example I have run into recently is MacOS 10.15 refusing to connect to a Logitech MX Master 2S (until you install a 3rd-party Bluetooth utility called blueutil and force it to pair). There are many threads about this on Apple and Logitech support forums. But, connecting to it on Linux works without any hassles or command-line use.
> Users who choose Windows do not need to know what happens behind the curtain to get things done.
> Users who choose Linux must know how things work otherwise there is a strong chance you won't get things to work at all.
In my experience, not any more than Windows users.
My wife and kids use Linux on a desktop computer at home. Yes, I installed it, but I didn't need to use a CLI at all to get anything working for them.
However, I regularly have to help my mother with her Windows laptop. While fixing these issues may not necessarily require CLI use, the issues are often more frustrating, and troubleshooting is more difficult because of lack of deep access into the OS.
> The historic "The Luxury of Ignorance" essay, http://catb.org/esr/writings/cups-horror.html, tells the story...
This article is 17 years old. Even at the time it was written, there were more user-friendly distros where printing was as easy to setup as Windows (assuming the printer was supported), but even Fedora has had usable printer configuration out-the-box for at least the past 10 years.
BTW., Apple now uses CUPS for printing ...