Fair enough
And when England meet Middle Eastern teams we can look forward to opposition fans dressed as Saladin.
426 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Oct 2012
This is the crucial thing. Other EU countries that have been prevented by EU law from putting tariffs on UK exports will be able to do so and if they think it will protect their domestic producers then they will. Sunderland-built Nissans will become more expensive for French and Germans to buy: Renault, Peugeot and BMW will be very pleased about that. Sunderland's Nissan workers less so.
But the flip side of this is the opportunity for the UK, freed from the EU's sclerotic bureaucracy, to negotiate our own deals with non-EU countries and sell those Nissans to Brazil, Morocco etc.
The first scenario is definite. The second - well, I have no idea.
Heresy to aerosexuals, I'm sure, but they're all just big tubes with wings, right? On the ground the A380s are clearly much bigger, but in the air they're fairly indistinguishable from any large passenger plane that isn't a 747.
They are significantly quieter than some, though. And the more capacious they get the less need there is for a third runway at Heathrow. (Disclaimer: blatant NIMBY.)
Actually the problem is that the putative "money saved by not propping up Eurocrats" has already been fancifully earmarked by the Brexiteers for saving the NHS, strengthening the UK's borders, extricating ourselves from the laws imposed by Brussels, helping the farmers facing destitution by the removal of European agricultural subsidies, negotiating trade deals with the rest of the world and many other wishes.
Presumably 'cos this is when it's darkest? Forecast is cloudy for the 6th here in sarf-west Lunnun. Will the 4th/5th be any good? Yikes, that's tonight.
* Get up early
* Clock meteorite loveliness
* Go for bike ride
* Big breakfast
* Catnap at work all day
Sounds like a plan.
I saw some of those. Things like a picture of a bunch of keys hanging outside a front door and the strapline 'you wouldn't do this at home so don't do it online' or some such.
It was OK. Not too alarmist, not too technical. We like to think we're not the target market but anyone is vulnerable to the right piece of social engineering.
If I take a music file and distribute it via some file-sharing mechanism, I'm a pirate and SOPA will take me down.
If I use that file as the soundtrack to footage of me dancing round my bedroom and upload the whole thing to YouTube, that's UGC and perfectly legit (insofar as you can describe my dancing as such).
Exactly: the rating of the connection is a theoretical maximum and often bears no relation to the speeds achieved in practice.
A USO would be like trying to get everyone to work quicker by insisting that all cars had to have a maximum speed of 200 mph (OK, not a good analogy because of speed limits but leaving that aside you know what I mean).
But I'm still unconvinced by current offerings in wearable tech even though I like the idea.
I track my activities with my phone and would like to extend this monitoring to biometrics but don't want to spend lots on a separate device. Also I'm not confident about the accuracy of wrist-mounted sensors for measuring heartbeat during exercise.
I'd like a cheap, easily attachable chest sensor that'll pair with my phone but that doesn't seem to be anyone's focus right now.
Tell me about it...
The most insidious way this happens is when the client's idea of what they've asked for gradually changes without them realising it. Because we're all supposed to be agile now the requirements can be as vague as they like. They don't know what they want, all they know is that whatever we deliver isn't it.
If you're going for precision rather than elegance it's hard to avoid a little clunkiness. I think the definition was deliberately legalistic.
He in the icon (being the party of the third part, notwithstanding) agrees with me completely, categorically and in totality, m'lud -->