* Posts by Tiirath

30 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Oct 2012

Microsoft warns of post-April zero day hack bonanza on Windows XP

Tiirath

Re: Left hand, meet right hand

Try using you left or right hand to click and open the MS blog to read what was really said.

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: they have a responsibility that comes with the near monopoly status

because its a waist of resource.. How far back dose apple support its OS! Most people with XP have it because they can not afford to purchase a new system, so they probably can not afford support.

No - the Sale of Goods Act apply dose not apply, because you already agreed to terms when you got the machine or OS.

Do you know how any lines of product MS have ? I know people running MS windows 3.1 because they say its the best (REALY ????) .. so you think MS should be supporting them? Apple is not supporting 12 year old operating systems.

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath
Thumb Up

Re: Wait, hear that?

But, But, .. But .. few took time to reed the original Microsoft Blog, so they are fired up by the Reg article that is full of trash.

Tiirath
Thumb Up

Re: Wait, hear that?

Ahhh sweat words of someone with an entire mind, and who read the original Microsoft Blog .. sadly most have not by the looks of it.

But I blame the reg writer who was untruthful in this article.

Tiirath

Re: Wait, hear that?

Apple DONT support a 12 year old OS, why should Microsoft.

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Wait, hear that?

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

CitectSCADA 7 supports Windows 7, other than that you could probably run CitectSCADA 6 in Hiper-V 3 or VMware 9.

RE your virtual disk comment about people thinking they don't need antivirus and updating of virtual machines .. they do need it unless the host is not connected to the internet.

Tiirath

Re: Wait, hear that?

Sadly I think most did just read the headline, and then the 1st to paragraphs. I doubt very much if anyone took the time to read the real blog, because it could not be ore different to what is inferred by the reg in this one.

Tiirath

Re: Wait, hear that?

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

So no other OS has vulnerabilities in it??? have you any connect of how many lines of code are in Linux, Windows XP, Windows 7, windows 8 Server 2012, OS X ???? Until we get a Artificial Intelligence that can test code .. there will always be bugs and vulnerabilities, UNLESS you will put up with a 10,000 year production cycle before your is sold..

Governments should how ever enforce that NO preinstalled applications other than those you purchase are installed, on that I would support you. There are some places that do unloaded installs, Dell do for at least corporation not sure about consumer, and if you buy direct from Microsoft Store online or physical outlet then those PC are with out crap and bloat ware.

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Simplest solution to XP diehards

REALY ??

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Simplest solution to XP diehards

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Sigh...

XP has an edge in the application wars ???

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Blackmail

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Microsoft FAIL

The consumer dose not want, and would not purchase true bare bones. Now if you want to talk about the crap ware that gets loaded on the a lot of the consumer line PCs I am 100% with you, and they do cause a problem of instability and slowness, even vulnerabilities sometimes .. BUT that is not Microsoft, they is the PC producer who takes money from someone to preload their crap on PCs.

There are some places that do unloaded installs, Dell do for at least corporation not sure about consumer, and if you buy direct from Microsoft Store online or physical outlet then those PC are with out crap and bloat ware.

Read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Tiirath

Really?? ... you think running android on what aver phone trains you up for using Linux on a computer?

Microsoft are active in locking for bugs, and in the last year are also paying bounties for bugs and fixes.

As for this FUD of article Read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Tiirath

Because there is no money in it for them!

Read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Tiirath

Re: They don't want to give away extended support

because its a waist of resource.. How far back dose apple support its OS! Most people with XP have it because they can not afford to purchase a new system, so they probably can not afford support.

Do you know how any lines of product MS have ? I know people running MS windows 3.1 because they say its the best (REALY ????) .. so you think MS should be supporting them?

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

Tiirath

Re: Maybe Microsoft Should ask why...

Please take time to read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has alter the contacts.

Microsoft is NOT introducing new issues, its just not supporting old ones. So when cross systems vulnerabilities get patched in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Widows 8.1 etc., there will have been no patch for Windows XP, that is what the original blog is saying.

As for your mac, how far back dose it support the MAC OS!!!!

Tiirath

Re: Zero day?

The author is just muddying the water, did you read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has altered the context.

Tiirath

Re: How is this not criminal?

its not because its not true. Read the original blog from MS http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx You will find the register has altered the context.

Tiirath

THIS IS NOT TRUE !! please take time to read the original blog as provided by the blog.

THIS IS NOT TRUE !! please take time to read the original blog as provided by the blog.

The title and substance of this article is a lie, the author Iain Thomson has ether made a bad mistake, or is responsible for an outright untruth. This article should be apologised for, and corrected.

The title "Microsoft warns it'll hand out zero days for Windows XP" implies that Microsoft are actively giving out vulnerabilities - this is FALSE!!!

The 1st, 2nd and proceeding paragraphs only enforce the falsehood that Microsoft are actively attacking Windows XP.

Read the original blog in its entirety ..

http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/08/15/the-risk-of-running-windows-xp-after-support-ends.aspx

QUICK HIGH LIGHT from block ..

When Microsoft releases a security update, security researchers and criminals will often times reverse engineer the security update in short order in an effort to identify the specific section of code that contains the vulnerability addressed by the update. Once they identify this vulnerability, they attempt to develop code that will allow them to exploit it on systems that do not have the security update installed on them. They also try to identify whether the vulnerability exists in other products with the same or similar functionality. For example, if a vulnerability is addressed in one version of Windows, researchers investigate whether other versions of Windows have the same vulnerability. To ensure that our customers are not at a disadvantage to attackers who employ such practices, one long standing principle that the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) uses when managing security update releases is to release security updates for all affected products simultaneously. This practice ensures customers have the advantage over such attackers, as they get security updates for all affected products before attackers have a chance to reverse engineer them.

But after April 8, 2014, organizations that continue to run Windows XP won’t have this advantage over attackers any longer. The very first month that Microsoft releases security updates for supported versions of Windows, attackers will reverse engineer those updates, find the vulnerabilities and test Windows XP to see if it shares those vulnerabilities. If it does, attackers will attempt to develop exploit code that can take advantage of those vulnerabilities on Windows XP. Since a security update will never become available for Windows XP to address these vulnerabilities, Windows XP will essentially have a “zero day” vulnerability forever. How often could this scenario occur? Between July 2012 and July 2013 Windows XP was an affected product in 45 Microsoft security bulletins, of which 30 also affected Windows 7 and Windows 8.

Top admen beg Microsoft to switch off 'Do Not Track' in IE 10

Tiirath
Thumb Up

Re: Yeah, there's pretty much no way to spin the admen's position

Ahh yes, but the Add Men want the DNT setting to come with a pre checked setting of “I do not want to use DNT” as the default.

That way 99% of users will “elect” by “choice” to go with the suggested setting and thus the ADD MEN can say ”hey you asked for adds!”.

Tiirath
Happy

IE10 is the one getting their pants wet. The “you must opt out” trick is as old as any con trick.

Tiirath
Happy

Re: It's a good default

MS do ask!!! its an option when you first set it up.

Tiirath
Thumb Up

Re: It's a good default

Also the DNT specks say only that the user should have a choice, they make no mention as to the default.

The “you must opt out” trick is as old as any con trick.

Tiirath
Happy

Re: Ad men see bonuses going south

You can have Windows 8, or you can have Windows 7! Windows 8 can be downgraded to Windows 7.

Tiirath
Thumb Up

Re: Significant

Sanity!!!! The opt out trick is as old as any con trick.

Paul Allen: Windows 8 'promising' yet 'puzzling'

Tiirath
WTF?

What Paul Allen said !!! Conclusion Allen's

Its good to see the reg being fair handed .. this is Paul Allen's conclusion.

Windows 8 does certainly require a brief adjustment period before users become familiar and comfortable with the new bimodal operating system.

Desktop PC users, with only minor tweaks and adjustments, should be able to pick things up without much trouble. I am sure most the minor issues I pointed out will be addressed in the next release of the operating system. And it won't be long until third party developers become more familiar with Windows 8 and begin to create and distribute applications that help smooth out many of remaining rough edges. In fact, I noticed that a clock application has already been developed that places a live tile with the current time directly on the Start screen. I'm sure that we can expect many exciting apps soon that take advantage of these live Start screen tiles.

I'm particularly excited about the prospects for Windows 8 on a tablet. The tablet interface is elegant, responsive, and stacks up nicely with other tablets on the market. And with its capability to optionally switch to desktop view right on the tablet, Windows 8 extends to mobile users the flexibility to run traditional applications and become more efficient and productive while on the go.

Touch seems a natural progression in the evolution of operating systems, and I'm confident that Windows 8 offers the best of legacy Windows features with an eye toward a very promising future.

I hope this helps,

Paul