Re: You don't store your TV in your front garden overnight.
Because proper security is hard and expensive, while convenience and speed are so cheap nowadays.
71 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Sep 2012
The Romanian National Waters Agency has had another blunder put under its belt recently - they failed to coordinate some maintenance work that left hundreds of thousands people without drinking water for a couple of weeks. This had extensive coverage in local media, at least.
This last one, coming at that short of a time, might (just might) be a coincidence.
The government still has to clean up on the management of various agencies, state run companies and other structures.
While there are a few very successful steps taken to date, there's a lot more to do, and the political climate is not encouraging.
Full disclosure: I'm born, raised and living in Romania.
I would add those non-critical entities that collect "secure" PID like SSN, ID/driver/passport numbers. That kind of information can land a person in very nasty situations if leaked. That it doesn't get into the headlines doesn't mean it's not a real thing.
Otherwise, I agree that stakes for data collectors (especially for those compelled to do KYC) must be set a lot higher.
Icon for clarity.
I recall a time when military used to develop their own solutions, highly redundant and as safe as possible for human designed stuff... many of those solutions found their use in business and public use.
FOSS was, and it still is, a huge reservoir of innovation and ingenuity that can be easily taped and used, with contributions eventualy finding their way out of military purpose.
Subscription licensing should be allowed only for business or private use, where the landscape is more dynamic than in military and where there are less time based constraints.
I'll take my lead padded coat, helmet and respirator.
Establishing the identity of a person (be it either natural or legal) is a fundamental requirement for most forms of social organization.
The real debate here is who sits at the root of the identification process, who manages what additional data associated with the identity and who has the right to request specific information details and for what purpose.
For natural persons, like it or not, the government under the jurisdiction the person was born, bears the responsibility to register and maintain the identity. Having that as a starting point, I can't imagine a truly decentralized system of identity. I might be wrong, of course, and I am open to change my mind, given solid proof that this is possible.
For legal persons, the identity is also established by the government of jurisdiction, based on a foundational legal document referring other identifiable persons (natural and/or legal). Here too, a decentralized identity system seems unlikely to me.
The big elephant in the room is the system's design that has to be able to prove an identity without disclosing enough information to duplicate it for unauthorized purposes.
Here GDPR is a good starting point, but it's implementation is a major hurdle for many organizations.
Bringing politics into discussion only complicates things by orders of magnitude.
Blockchain as technology seems to be fit for the task, but the foundational block remains with governmental structure (federated or otherwise).
We already have a lot of building blocks, we just need to agree on what and how to build. I think that's the biggest hurdle.
I've had Canon SecurePrint at a company that I work for and it ran pretty reliable. Switched to Xerox printers and another centralized printing solution hosted in the company's cloudy premises and issues started to flow... after 5 years, the solution is getting more stable, but still throws a fit from time to time...
M$ seems to reinvent the wheel again, but the number of corners is still pretty low on theirs.
My grandfather used a mainframe built with discrete bipolar transistors, ferrite memory (each bit with its own ferrite torus) and stored data and software on punched cards. He was a civil construction engineer.
I've touched that kind of hardware (still functional in 1991) with awe and reverence during my formative years as technician... but they were already on their last breaths that year already, even in my poor (at that time) corner of the world. Minicomputers built with a mix of TTL and MOS ICs were the backbone of my practical training... and at home I was playing on a ZX Spectrum compatible, learning Z80 assembler (just for the tricks it allowed on that machine)...
Still, about 12-13 years to retirement, and still confined to using windblows at work and at home... but at least my (already 10 y.o.) desktop runs only Xubuntu and I keep a couple of old laptops even older on the same distro to keep al those old joints lubricated :)
While LTSC versions might "buy" some years of slack, it's generally better to upgrade your PC if you're not technically inclined (or interested) to use Linux or BSD... Just sell the old hardware to those interested after you backed-up your precious data (and eventually licenses for some wares), invest in a upgradeable system (minimum 2 slots for DIMMs), buy the most affordable license for your OS (Oberlicht System) that covers your needs and move on...
In this great article (and in the comments) a Windows user can find enough hints to do a painless upgrade (software wise).
The penguinistas, the home-lab afficionados, the tinkerers - they will be happy to take that perfectly working hardware at a perfectly reasonable price to give it many years of use.
Bear in mind, though, that old hardware is less energy efficient than the newer one.
As always, the truth is out there, usually in some middle place ;)
DCs are industrial assets that output "compute" products and waste heat. Why not using that waste heat to reduce energy (and water) consumption in another industrial or residential domain? There was a short article somewhere that described a (small?) DC providing heat to the municipal heating system nearby. AFAIK the silicon wafers are extremely energy intensive to create, requiring sizable chunks of power just to melt the raw materials... Similarly, metallurgy and cement production could benefit from direct heat contribution to their processes...
To me it looks like the Capex is a major driver of decisions regarding the design and placement of the DCs, while Opex is to be transferred into the price of the final product, regardless of the long-term consequences.
I could rant along those lines a lot, but it would be another waste of water and energy to power the DCs and infrastructure needed to provide me with such a marvelous fondleslab :P
Smarter persons than me already mentioned inertial and celestial systems, as well as known ground references (optical and/or radio based). Adding signal analysis (polarization, power, timed variation and directionality) would be feasible with modern computational means.
I remember that gravimetric maps were considered "strategic and restricted data" on grounds that they were used to at least help ICBMs (and other flying contraptions) to get a reasonable "fix" on the map/path*.
With enough motivation, the industries will find solutions. Politics might interfere a while, for better or for the worse, but with proper incentives, education and training, it's achievable.
I'm an old fart that remembers the time before Internet was available to mere mortals and GPS electronics was carried in a pick-up truck, so I might have an optimistic bias here.
The advantage might be less than one expects, as office buildings often have more efficient HVAC and lighting than average household can afford these days. Also, a lot of trades involve expensive specialized equipment that can't be easily and/or securely lugged to employee's home.
Sure, for plain administrative tasks, working from home *can* be an option, but the reduction on emissions argument must factor in the impact of energy consumption and utilities at the residential level. That would make an interesting study.
Cattle-prod category: users that went through lecture, visual and practical training and still miss-report what they actually did when complaining that the product/system doesn't work.
Sadly, you have cattle-prod category users almost everywhere, with slightly elevated chances to find them in middle to upper manglement.
Only the years from 5th to 20th are to be feared. First 5 are giggles and obsessive care, then after 20 they usually get more or less independent... and less of a nuisance. Also, everything that you do (or don't do) in the 5-20 interval will be used at least once against you at some point more than once (if they survive the first time).
I'm a terrible parent, probably. Time will tell. The same goes with all training models (time and telling), albeit seemingly a bit faster.