Re: Well...
And while we're migrating to IPv6, we'll also migrate to X.400 & X.500!
24 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Aug 2012
As a school kid, I spent years of my free time hanging around local Tandy stores to use the TRS-80. It was my introduction to computers, programming and digital electronics by way of the technical manual with the schematic and description. It was the genesis of my hobby and wonderful career in engineering.
Social media companies make their money by marketing and selling people's information - some of it voluntarily handed over, some of it involuntarily via tracking, surreptitious upload of contacts, etc. By default, social media companies continually make the default settings to make your data public.
Requiring people the provide 100 points of ID is akin to putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank. Governments should be keeping people safe from social media companies, not pandering to them.
The other problem is that social media companies operate in every country, have users worldwide, and all users from all over the world to interact. How is online safety improved by requiring a small subset of users to be verified when they can be attacked by anyone else in the world. This is no different to a country banning nuclear weapons and therefore expecting not to have one dropped on them!
And this is the rub - you own hardware, but with software you get a license to use it. Most software isn't thrown over the fence and you walk away with it unrestricted.
I don't know what is normal in other app stores, but imagine the storm if Apple were to pass on details of every person installing an app from their app store to the developer.
Now the fun part will be waiting for other OEM's or better still SSD manufacturers to issue a similar warning.
I'll be surprised if HP is messing with custom firmware versions for those components to a degree that would break it like this, hence I'm guessing there will be more of these notifications soon.
The possibilities raise good reason to have backups on completely different technology.
Imagine having an array of these things backed up to another array of them. Even with remote sites and offline backups, you could be in a world of hurt if you deployed the hardware at the same time.
Let's hope the navy aren't using these on their nuclear subs, etc.
Modern processors require large design teams and huge compute ranches for simulation and verification. The crazy things modern processors do (particularly the CISC) to obtain the performance is truly amazing, but like software, the complexity comes with a cost - design defects.
While you could get something fabricated yourself, it won't be the cutting edge processors.
It's strange how their attitude changed once the story was picked up by news media. They originally told people "too bad, you agreed to it in the T&C's. Go complain to the retailer you bought it from."
The problem with their latest response is they don't even act like it's an issue, let alone a privacy issue. Because they don't take the issue seriously, I'll no longer seriously think about buying their spyware infested products.
One of the biggest challenges facing spinning rust is actually the transfer rates. The enormous and ever increasing amounts of data stored is outpacing the ability to get the data off the drives. This is due to the physical limitations of the rotation rate. 10K+ RPM disks are not particularly great due to heat and energy considerations and are likely to face a decline to be superseded by SSD's. Consider the amount of time it takes to backup/restore/resync a multi-TB drive. While people forecasted the death of tape, transfer rates and capacities have kept pace and I suspect they will continue to. The other factor that will have an impact is actually communications speeds. Cloud services not only allow global access to data, they also provide the ability to deduplicate data, while user end SSD's will effectively function as a layer of caching. The backend storage will need to perform better than what traditional rotating disks can provide, hence SSD.
Providing the video is real / authentic, it obviously constitutes evidence of a crime. You'd think FaceBook would be reporting it to police when it was brought to their attention.
The thing that really puzzles me is why Americans (in general) get so offended by basic nudity, which everyone sees on a daily basis and are our own bodies, but is completely non-plused by even the most extreme violence. e.g. removing breast feeding imagery but being perfectly ok with the most gruesome murder videos.
Now there is a company that lacks a moral compass or any values.