Re: Shit "research"
I tend to agree that it isn't AI that is the main problem - the issue is the source of most of this dross - China.
When I was investigating the apparent amazing publication records, despite not appearing to do any research, of one of our chineese academics it was pointed out to me that in China even MSc students are expected to produce at least one journal publication - in the UK whilst PhD students are generally expected to have a few journal papers submitted by the end of their PhD it is not common for lower level students to have their names on papers.
In the case of this particular academic it is clear the chineese are playing the system - hundreds of mainly low quality rather similar papers from a chineese university that we have links to wher by sticking his name on it scores higher because it is 'international collaboratrion', lots of self citation and virtually all the other citations are also chineese. I suspect most of theses papers he's never even seen but is happy to use them to boost his h-index.
Even with what I would consider higher quality journals the refereeing process is nowhere near as robust as it used to be, presumably due to the significant increase in papers submitted.