Re: Back doors
If only it was just the Trump administration! But sadly incompetence is an intrinsic part of any government organisation.
14 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Aug 2012
Since carriers really don't pose any threat to Russia, the data they are collecting will be for onward sale, probably to the Chinese given that the US is deploying it to the South China Seas - where if anything gets ugly it will remain as an very expensive artificial coral reef.
Probably because there is a lot of fat on a £18 billion contract with the inevitable overruns and renegotiations that will expand the budget and keep thousands of civil servants employed for decades along with offering consultancy roles for ex-ministers and civil servants along with their families and friends.
Whereas £1.2 billion offers far less opportunity to hide cronyism and therefore is considered far less attractive by senior civil servants and ministers.
These factors are far more important than any advice from technical experts brought in to evaluate such schemes.
It’s a great pity that people with zero understanding of what they doing, command large taxpayer (or more appropriately borrowing) funded budgets that they’re allowed to waste on futile endeavors, perhaps the UK should introduce a Tokugawa approach to the civil service, where wastage was punishable.
Governments who feel their public support them embrace free speech whereas governments who feel threatened by the opinions of the general public will often resort to censorship typically with vague definitions so news they don't like or adverse political opinion can be suppressed usually under the banner of protecting the public (although in reality governments protecting itself from the public)
What I 'm saying is that there are plenty of really bright people with bright ideas (just like James Dyson) but some companies use IP to make it very difficult for them to get any investment to take the ideas forward.
I'm completely for people or companies making money out of their ideas but I am against people or companies actively blocking other people’s innovations with IP to maximize their profit.
It would be better for inovation to offer longer IP rights in turn for a licence fee.
That way the Dyson could have got his cyclone vacuum cleaner to market much sooner since the clearly did not invent the cyclone, it’s been used in industry for years.
The current IP system stifles invention; all IP’s should be available to anyone for a realistic license fee. That way we would get innovation of the basic idea into something better.
The IP holder would get revenue and the consumer would get a choice. The biggest losers would be the lawyers.
But none of this is new; lawyers working for James Watt held back the development of high pressure steam for years using patent laws.
I wonder how successful Dyson would have been if his business plan had to include a million or so for lawyers to fight some aggressive companies IP claims.
I think he should count his luck that Apple were not making domestic appliances!