Re: Don't blame us for this.
"There is no plan to "fix" the grid by 2030. There are no provisions in these rules to delay or cancel them if the grid isn't ready by then"
It's private companies that hold the monopolies so it those companies that have to do the upgrading. If they find it better to take their money and invest in stocks and bonds to have a better return for their shareholders (the C-level execs), they'll do that instead of adding or upgrading capability. That's problem one. The State should be setting regulations that put limits on executive compensation and re-investment as part of needing to maintain an effective monopoly since it makes zero sense to have several power companies stringing lines all over the place.
"Instead of holding them to task and either taking over the state power grid when they defaulted or forcing them to address the issues, he looks the other way."
The State was a contributor to PG&E having to declare bankruptcy. If the State won't allow the companies to clear trees and brush away from their distribution lines as far back as they feel is necessary, the State has to take part of the blame for fires. Instead, we now have those companies shutting the lines down when there are high winds causing blackouts so they can manage their risk.
I do not want the government to take over the utilities. I couldn't think of a faster way to wind up with the highest priced power in the world with a reliability on par with small African nations. California has lots of work to do filling pot holes and upgrading bridges to add another giant lot of people to the underwater State pension program. The Governor just saw it necessary to veto a law providing kindergarten universally across the state due to cost. Funny though, there is money to hand out to those in the country informally for food, housing, healthcare and other services. You'd think that something as core as education would be first and foremost. Apparently not. Perhaps it's because 5 year olds don't have the vote (yet).