Re: How is it an "extreme" position
"With the threat of a fine or jail time hanging over them if the hospital can't "prove" it was necessary, such care is effectively banned."
There is also the time involved and that judges/courts are not medically trained so won't have any clue as to how to evaluate the case. A need to abort might be immediate. Just to file a case in court and have it scheduled would be a dangerous amount of time in some cases.
Just 100 years ago the death of a mother and/or child was much more common. In modern times, those numbers are way down in the first world and it only takes a cursory review of the stats in rural Africa or South America to see how bad it could be.
My niece's birth was induced and her chances of survival were not good but my sister would have died if the pregnancy wasn't terminated and we would have lost both. In many respects, the procedure was much the same as an abortion although the hoped for outcome was different. It was months before my niece could be brought home and she's been, fortunately, healthy growing up.
A former business partner and his wife have a child with severe Downs Syndrome and he required open heart surgery shortly after being born. They knew this would be the case going in. Is this the best outcome? With modern health care, the boy will likely outlive his parents and then require full time care paid for and provided by the State.