What daylight saving?
"Daylight Savings Time" is a con, a misnomer, a complete fabrication.
No daylight is saved. There's no extra daylight thanks to this forced adjusting of clocks to not reflect the true time.
525 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Aug 2012
Men and women may be different, but not in the aspect of mental capability and performance in the field of I.T.
But men and women (as a whole) have different preferences and interests.
Because this is not Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge or the Soviet Union under Lenin or Stalin then people have a choice as to what career they wish to pursue.
I remember a friend telling me about how he was surprised that a fellow university applicant wanted to become a merchant banker. Well, if your family and their friends include merchant bankers then merchant banking could become an interest for someone, but anybody else who had never seen a merchant banker, does not know of one through family or their friends, and had never seen or heard anything about merchant bankers through the media would not even know that merchant banking was an option, let alone how attractive an option it might be for them.
If you want to attract anyone into a profession then you need to people to be aware of that profession and provide a realistic view of it. You should then get people who are attracted to it, rather than people who are hunted down and lured in by box-tickers who are more concerned with social engineering than with finding a good match between candidates and roles.
I really don't understand why so many people are going along with the diversity for diversity's sake bandwagon.
If I read the article correctly, employers are deliberately recruiting from overseas in order just to get more women into roles because of a lack of domestic supply of people with the right chromosomes for the box-tickers.
"We find strong evidence that ageist language related to communication skills, physical ability, and technology skills, even when it is not blatantly or specifically age-related, deters older workers from applying for jobs," the paper argues. "Job ads that feature ageist language attract younger applicants on average than job ads that do not feature ageist language."
Ageist language such as: must have good communication skills (able to write coherent sentences without emojis), must have physical ability to get off arse to fix a problem, and must have a wide range of technology skills rather than just a few months of the latest fads?
Actually, I don't mind ageist flags in job ads, or any other ists for that matter - it gives me an impression of the working environment without going through the rigmarole of applying and being interviewed. I really don't want to go on a recruitment merry-go-round only to then discover that the environment is just not for me.
It may be creepy, but have you seen delivery van driver behaviour on the UK's roads?
The police forces have given up patrolling and responding to anything that is (partly) covered by insurance, so nobody is worried about getting caught, and even if they are caught by the public they're not worried about the police doing anything.
So now we have private enterprise doing something.
[2] they absolve HR departments from the perceived need to asess the actual competence of candiates
Letting HR departments anywhere near the process of assessing the competence of candidates is a bad move.
Letting HR departments anywhere near candidates is also a bad move.
In fact, HR departments are just a bad move.
There's just one occasion when it might possibly be useful for a computer to make a noise to get my attention: when I'm not looking at it and when it's something that I should do there and then. The only thing that I need to do there and then is join a meeting because there are other humans.
At all other times, a pop-up is the absolute limit of attention-grabbing that's required.
Mobile phones, the single point of failure for the 21st century.
Credit card? Put it on your phone.
Debit card? Put it on your phone.
Cash? Put it on your phone.
Ticket? Put it on your phone.
Boarding pass? Put it on your phone.
2FA for all your banks, government services, etc? Put them all on your phone.
ID? Put it on your phone.
Lost your phone? Oh dear.
Phone confiscated by the police for an "investigation"? Too bad.
Police "accidentally" lose the phone? Sorry, can't help.
Politicians need to stop treating the NHS as an idol to be worshipped.
Aspects of it are better than similar aspects in some other countries.
Other aspects of it are worse than similar aspects of it in some other countries.
Nye Bevan was idealistic regarding the NHS. Instead, it is a never ending money pit where people make more and more demands of it.
Meanwhile, later politicians have played around with it, increasing bureaucracy (while the NHS is already wasteful) and reducing capacity.
Meanwhile, the per capita rate of doctors in the UK has increased over the last few decades, while the time it takes to see a GP has increased. Clearly there are systemic faults to be addressed.
The UK has had decades to fix care provision - it's not a health service, it's a sickness service - and no politician is brave enough to grasp the nettle.
Do sell the NHS.
Then we can go and buy a decent health service from some other country - there are plenty to choose from.
the company discriminated (sic) against at least six lawful permanent residents based on their immigration status during this visa evaluation process, by asking them to show a Permanent Resident Card to prove they had permission to work without employer sponsorship
I'm almost at a loss for words.
What's so wrong in asking people to show that they have the legal right to work in a country?
No, it's not the title of an academic paper.
Society, social media and the law still haven't worked out how to live together. The benefit of social media is that it brings people together. The threat of social media is that it brings people together: paedophiles, terrorists, loud-mouthed gits, idiotic teenagers, conspiracy theorists, etc. Then legislators do the one thing that they know how to do, and that is to legislate (when we already have libraries full of statutes that the police barely take any notice of). I don't know what the solution is, but legislation is rarely the right answer.
Before we go around synchronising schedules, how about using a calendar with a sensible start date?
1st January does not correspond to any significant lunar/solar event. Starting the year at either the Winter solstice or the Sprint equinox is at least a significant solar event, and has built-in synchronisation, at least for those paying attention to the rising of the Sun.
So-called hate speech is already a messy precedent which should be repealed.
Incitement to commit an offence should be sufficient. And it might actually be useful if police were to take death threats and other threats of assault seriously - rather than bending over backwards when someone says that their so-called gender identity feelings have been challenged.
Fragile, over-optimised supply lines don't help.
Centralising distribution and relying on HGVs reduces the number of points required for a system to fail.
Closing small abattoirs means more transport required for animals to be butchered, and increases costs in the supply chain.
Interrupting the supply chain to a large abattoir or a large distribution centre interrupts the supply to a larger area and a larger number of customers.
Reliance on cheap foreign labour is a fragile over-optimisation.