Think you've missed the point AC. Read the article.
This isn't about what happens in people imaginations or inside peoples heads...that's their business.
This is about actual harm caused by actual images that have been generated and disseminated on a platform and tool designed for this purpose.
Lets take a simple scenario:
I have a classroom of 14 years olds (mixed boys/girls)
One of the class takes a class mate he fancies picture and feeds it into his CSAM generator (Grok).
The picture is sent round to the others in the class.
...?...
...profit (for Elon Musk).
How do you think the class mate who has been violated feels? Did she consent to this? How do you think a class of 14 year olds will react to this picture? What if the picture comes with a story about how the classmate was a slut who he banged last night and took this photo? Is this still harmless fantasising?
Do you think?
The CSAM generator doesn't need to be a CSAM generator...that's by design isn't it...we know this because Musk has had it turned off (but not in all countries because CSAM is apparently fine unless it's legally not).
If the man who owns the CSAM generator makes it so it isn't a CSAM generator anymore (because there is still no valid usecase for this other than for paedophiles to generate CSAM), should he not be compelled to do so?