Re: so much fun ahead 2
Yeah but the canals were actually useful at a point in time…
Saying that were driven rail freight into the ground in this country in favour of…er…HGVs. So you pays your money you takes your chance.
342 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jul 2012
On the other side of the equation you have skinflint clients with no ideas, no requirements and completely unrealistic expectations about how easy this all is.
Not a match made in heaven.
These kinds of implementations are marathons not sprints…sadly the projects start too ambitious, turn nasty in the middle when reality sets in and either fizzle out or just limp over the line with an MVP that needs hundreds of changes and enhancements to meet the original lofty ambition.
Fucking projects.
The graduate with a science degree asks, 'Do you want fries with that?'
The graduate with an engineering degree asks, 'Do you want fries with that?'
The graduate with an accounting degree asks, 'Do you want fries with that?'
The graduate with a liberal arts degree asks, 'Which one of you nerds is going to actually get those fries? CompSci take your break now”
It makes me pleased that customers are coming back to use the real deal. Hollowing out arts/languages/humanities and entrusting it to corporations whose only desire is monopoly and profit is something we're sleepwalking into. Translation is the thin end of the wedge, and as we can see, the result isn't pretty...always promising it will get better. Thanks for the detailed response anyway, food for thought.
Excel is not a data modelling tool. Excel is a single user application with many, many flaws. Extremely useful tool by itself, anything shared or team based is an abomination. I build data models to serve excel users…as soon as Excel IS the model, you’re screwed.
The users are now shifting to using Power BI for their point data modelling… work to unwind and structure that should keep me busy until I die.
User tools != corporate data models. If they do, you’re doing systems and data wrong.
“Extinction Rebellion spokesperson Martijn Dekker justified the attack by saying datacenters and the AI they power are exacerbating the climate crisis, as well as playing a role in the killing of Palestinians by Israel. “
What the actual fuck? What in lord Jesus H Christ in heaven has Israel/palestine got to do with it? Absolute nut jobs.
I don’t think it’s Orwellian, it’s about giving a bit of independence without allowing the sewer of the internet on a device accessible to a child. Options.
Example: my child needs to use TimesTable rockstars or wants to create something on Scratch. If I know when I provide my device (loaded gun) I can ensure it always has the safety on, it gives peace of mind while I cook and clean…or continue working.
It’s only Orwellian if Apple stops adults sending and receiving dick picks. The horror…whatever will people do of an evening?
Given that governments are promoting jobs like plumber and electrician you can guess which bits AI will pretend to replace…they’ll always be a job for the kid who runs to the shop to buy a latte…or any job that needs physical impact on the planet…hoisting a light…lugging something from A to B…brave new world!
I’m confused. If you’re a dual national (oz/brit) you have every right to work don’t you? You’re a British citizen ?
I guess this £500 piece of paper is to prove that inside your Oz passport: this passport belongs to a person who is a dual citizen. I dont understand why it is so bloody expensive though.
Presumably you have to buy a new one if you change passports too. Seems like you’d want to get a British passport for 75 quid instead.
Punishing people who actually decided to go for citizenship after BREXIT. I guess they juiced them for their bullshit tea drinking exam so the poor saps are being juiced again.
Papers please.
Meanwhile my non dual national permanent right to remain partner gets to travel without paying half a grand to the state for…er…nothing?
Until Farage gets in and deports my wife I guess.
Just as we can’t trust politicians with the NHS and Bank of England, we definitely can’t trust them with the BBC. We are not a Nordic country and it’s all very well until they start electing nutters from both ends of the spectrum (Girt Wilders was only next door!)
To be fair I have both a TV license and a Netflix subscription. I never watch anything on Netflix and constantly consume BBC radio, web and TV content.
As soon as you introduce market forces into the BBC it will turn into the same dog shit as everything else.
Can we just have this one nice thing? A broadcaster owned by us for us. Not by some white supremacist cum rag or some shrivelled billionaire and his odious family…us…British people.