Re: They just killed .NET for Windows 8, why this now?
.Net is still supported in Windows 8. The is just an optional newer CLR - in WinRT.
853 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jul 2012
Microsoft have the best over all development language and development tools products over a long long history than any vendor by miles, so probably not a lot...
I would cite Powershell as an example - far more powerful than the legacy shell scripting languages that were the only previous comparable option, and fully object orientated - developed from scratch - and being rapidly adopted all over the place. For instance by VMWare for ESXi.
You mean like all those hard working Americans that dont earn enough to pay taxes?
I see the Republicans have been working hard in Florida: http://www.theonion.com/articles/florida-to-experiment-with-new-600lever-voting-mac,29699/
Finally you have a president who has done something about your third world health care system - you have a health care system that costs twice as much as Canada's - but produces inferior results. For that alone (and not starting any wars) I hope he gets re-elected.
As far as I am aware all versions of Office are fully backwards compaitible with at least the last few generations. I have never ever had an 'incompatible' doc format in thousands of documents. .Doc is a fixed format and just works.
I can only assume your career is a professional Adobe arse kisser, or Microsoft hater then. No job webiste i use even supports uploading PDFs, and not many recruitment agents would accept a CV they can't reformat to agency standards.
Google Apps already cant reproduce many Office documents properly anyway and using it is a joke. I can't believe that some people try and run a business off it. They must not have to exchange documents with any other companies.
I guess Google are just admitting defeat here and concentrating on the latest format only. For those that need proper Office compatibility, Office Web Apps can be accessed free via SkyDrive.com....
No. There really are not enough. There is now no doubt whatsoever that climate change is being caused by man made emissions of CO2.
The only thing we don't know is exactly how much of the rapidly accelerating global warming might be due to natural cycles. Looking at known geological and meterological history versus the massive changes in the last decades tells us that likely almost all of it of it is due to man made changes to the climate.
However there is a very small chance statistically that natural cycles might be playing a more significant part than is generally believed by scientific experts.
This is because the types that are involved in 'creative' trades - you know - the ones that got a single GCSE in Art and then went on to do 'Media Studies' - are too stupid to use a real computer, and so Macs are endemic in these areas. Same with journalists...
Mnd you, with the new 'even stupid people can cope' interface in Windows 8 maybe Microsoft will now take back these area by storm....
Rediculous that you havnt even covered the market leader - Power Gorilla. I have two of them for festivals, etc and they are awesone - and far in advance in terms of capacity of anything covered in this review (21,000 mAh)
https://powertraveller.com/_code/download.php?f=VS_powergorilla_data_sheet_09.pdf
No, AppArmor is just like NTFS file permissions for file paths. Its basically a less effective version of SEL and can be bypassed simply by creating a hard link. It is also specific to a single box, unless you start copying text files around.
Try reading the link above and you will see that AppLocker is an enterprise distributed system with lots more functionality....
You mean you cant understand the model that most enterprises are actively running on Windows / AD? There are plenty of Windows admins happy to show your employer how it's done....
Yes we know that UNIX is crippled with a realy limited permissions model out of the box, and that to get proper ACLs is a bolt on after thought. And advanced features from Windows like claims based authentication simply dont exist in Linux without third party applications....
>>An OS should provide a "virtual machine" for a user application. It would be nice if we had some controls over what software could do. For example, "this application should *never* access the internet"
Thats already been in Windows for years, and can be controlled down to the port / protocol per application level.
>>or "this application only needs access to these libraries and this particular data directory,"
That's been in Windows since Windows NT.....
Plus you get the sort of full enterprise application control solution that simply doesnt exist in Linux for instance: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee449491(v=ws.10).aspx
Password lockouts are not relvant anyway. The problem is worse than that! "potential attackers only require the name of a user and that of a database file; they can then abort communication with the server and launch a brute-force attack on the password offline. This method does not cause any failed log-in attempts to be recorded in the log files."