Re: So IPCC model *simplistic* rather than simple.
I got 4-7 degrees C from this weeks New Scientist magazine. Who I would consider a very credible and balanced / peer reviewed source.
853 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jul 2012
Rather misleading to not also mention that the key effects such as Ice sheet melting, sea water rise and temperature rise have been under estimated. For instance we are now on target for a 4-7 degree rise by 2100 rather than the 2 degrees that was previously declared as 'must be avoided at all costs'.
The northern part of the Greenland ice sheet may be “very vulnerable to a warming climate,” and this could produce up to seven metres of sea level rise:
http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/stories/article/65674greenlands_ice_sheet_headed_towards_extreme_melt-down_scientists/
Bye Bye Florida and East Anglia is one small consolation I guess.
a) The vast majority of businesses that are not tiny pay for software assurance so there would be no additional licensing costs, b) Windows 8 will run the vast majority of software that Windows 7 does, c) Windows 8 also has no additional hardware requirements in general over Windows 7, and d) Windows 8 is the easiest to use and learn version of Windows ever.
The newer versions of Office have customisable menus - and in most cases it is now faster to get to commonly used options. If it isnt for you, then tweak the menus to suit your needs. It isnt hard...
Nice to hear that you refuse to buy any Apple products...
At least as a paperwork generator, you are probably already used to getting RSI in your job if you were a previously a UNIX admin...
Ubuntu? I think even MeGo has more users than that does....Microsoft have actually made a very astute play that touch and gesture will be the future of computing - and I think they might well be right!
Bring back the 20th Century you mean?
An obvious reason to migrate to Windows 8 would be that they havnt started migrating to Windows 7 yet. Windows 8 has lots of new enterprise functionality, is simpler to learn and use and will have a lower TCO.
Seeing as it was only recently released and business are naturally cautious - it's hardly surprising that the plans to migrate are lower for Windows 8....
The safe way to do it is give it the the UN. Nothing happens at the UN without pretty much everyone agreeing to it. This does have the disadvantage that sometimes things don't happen - for instance terrorist states like Israel don't have the action taken against them that they should have - but then in the case of the internet no change is likely for the best unless everyone agrees to it. The first thing needed is to get the role of ICANN out of US hands...
"First, the internet has existed and got along just fine without any additional regulations or infringments or censorship. If it's not broke, then it doesn't need fixed".
It is broken, it is being censored, and it does need fixing: http://www.2600.com/news/view/article/1553
http://www.itproportal.com/2011/02/02/row-looms-us-seizes-spanish-superbowl-site/
The USA imposes its views globally regardless of local laws where websites might be located. This needs fixing ASAP.
Yes I am allowing for CALs at about $30 each.
SUSE dual core server is $6000 over 5 years including enterprise support.
Windows Standard Server 2012 is $880 @ list and support is 20% per year - so over 5 years the total license and support cost is about $1,760
So taking the case of an SME financial organisation i recently worked for - they had about 300 users and ~ 100 servers.
So $9000 more in CALs, but $424,000 more in licensing and support to move to SUSE...
Not true. If you need to reactivate on new hardware you can phone them. And this is only relevant for the smallest of companies that buy individual shrink wrapped licences. Comanies with an ELA would have an activation key that can be used more than once - and are required to 'true up' to actual use once a year.
The equivalent of 'SBS Essentials' is 'Server 2012 Essentials'. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/windows-server-essentials/default.aspx - Exchange is no longer included in the base product license so that those that move to the cloud will not pay for something that they don't require.
If you have Software Assurance on Windows SBS 2011 Standard, you will receive one Windows Server 2012 Standard license and one Exchange Server 2010 Standard license as your free ungrade entitlement.
PS3 has a much higher piracy rate and the Xbox has a much higher attach rate than the PS3 (games sold per console)
The PS3 piracy problem is because the Xbox requires tricky hardware mods whereas the PS3 can be completely hacked via software only. And the Xbox OS itself is unhacked, so you cant use hacked boxes on Xbox Live, etc. whereas you can use hacked PS3s on PSN and can cheat - which is a large reason why PSN sucks in comparison.
Plus Microsoft make loads more off Xbox Live (40 million active subscribers) than Sony do from PSN. Plus it costs Sony more to sell each console.
Select packages for you - so that would be selecting like Google, Apple and Microsoft then (with various levels of control)
Use multiple Respositories - like unlocking an Android handset you mean?
So basically they do it exactly the same, except they seem to be better at blocking crapware than Google...
Microsoft UK Store is a website. And it seems to be completely non compliant with the DSR requirements. So I guess under UK law you get 6 months and a day to return anything you dont like under the DSR rather than the standard 7 days....As they seem to be based out of Ireland make sure you use a credit card if you shop there and want to be able to require them to comply with UK laws....
Firstly Linux is not free compared to Windows unless your time is of no value.
Secondly anyone that uses standard Enteprrise distributions of Linux such as SUSE, Redhat, etc, will be paying licensing fees for support that cost far more than the equivalent Windows server version + support. Plus these reports discuss hardware revenue by OS - not just OS revenue.
Thirdly - what has Linux to do with it anyway? - I stated that Windows Server was growing market share at the expense of UNIX. Which is demonstrably correct for at least the last decade.
I would expect with the major web server fixes in Server 2012 (for instance how it handles high numbers of SSL certs) that will start to take chunks out of the Linux web server market too, by all those hosters fed up with being constantly hacked and defaced on Linux...
Nice selective quote. Shame for you it doesnt represent the long term or reality:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/16263/windows_widens_lead_over_linux_in_the_server_market
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS22998411
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23665812
http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/idc-worldwide-server-revenues-sluggish-but-still-up.html
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23347812
Well all those old timers with outdated skills have to do something now that the UNIX boxes they managed for years are being replaced in most places by Windows Servers.
There will always be a cheapskate market section that would rather go through lots of pain and have a higher run admin cost, have ten times the security vulnerabilities to evaluate / patch, etc. than pay for a Windows licencing fee...so the single digit Linux market share will likely see them into retirement...
Yes but everyone knows Nokias own platforms are dead. I am surprised they still have a developer marketing budget for them.
The Windows 8 platofrm will be massive and will have something like 500 milion target devices in a year or two. No developer with any sense will miss that - you will within reason just be able to change a few Visual Studio settings to target multiple Windows 8 platofrm formats - that's a major selling point for application vendors.
Then lets not forget that Microsoft's mobile OSs have a couple of orders of magnitude lower vulnerability counts than IOS and Android - so it is likely that Microsofts walled garden will remain relatively secure - and piracy losses will be lower.