Seriously?
Where is NIST going to get these experienced cryptographers. Remember, the broader cryptographic community are really just amateur wannabes. They have to get them from the (ex?) NSA and (ex?) KGB cryptography community.
587 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2012
When Concorde first flew, a jounalist asked the chief engineer why it cost a billion to develop. After all, it just took off and went through the sound barrier. No drama or anything. The engineer explained, as if to a moron, that is what cost a billion.
So now we have a bunch of people, most of whom don't understand anything about engineering and not much more about telecommunications, asking "how hard could it be"? The answer is that it takes a year to do it so we don't kill anybody, nor even expose them to asbestos.
Not lazy - cost effective. Somebody has to pay for all this fibre.
Oh and by the way, recently fibre was being rolled out to Melbourne consumers by tacking it onto the existing electrical poles. They were blocked by the citizens and local councils as being unaesthetic.
Pair gain - Telecom Australia cabled whole suburbs that way. Result, you could't run a high speed modem from your home phone and there wasn't enough spare copper to run a second phone for most customers. Competition did away with these horrible practices.
This is why creating a new monopoly in Australia is such a horrible idea.
"Little brown evelopes quietly slipped through their mailboxes" - er, no. What is done these days is to contribute heavily to their grandchildren's schools, local Rotary, Lions, etc. Making sure His Honour is told about the donations outside of the public eye. How do you think Australia got the Olympics in 2000. Or Brazil?
In the last ice age, so much of the ocean had frozen in glaciers on Europe, North America, etc that it was possible to walk right across the Bering Sea. Since the, the ocean level has risen significantly. So much that it is unlikely to rise any more before the next ice age.
Yes, you can point to places on land where there were beaches 35 metres up, but that is because the land has risen. Sometimes the simple act of removing the ice has allowed the land to bounce back, for example in Scotland and the midwest of America.
So I don't quite understand why you want to nuke the economies of the entire developed world to protect us from something that just won't happen. There is no just in case. IT WON'T HAPPEN !!!!
"The global climate is responding to something"
The closest my layman's mind has gotten to the problem is that there is a giganitic thermonuclear reactor close to the Earth - around 93 million miles. This reactor has several overlapping cycles that can combine to create unusual effects, eg an 11 year sunspot cycle.
The mechanism by which the sun affects the Earth's weather is much more complex than just "it gets brighter". It has to do with complexities such as atomic particles interacting with moisture in the air to form clouds.
One of the recent events is known as the Maunder Minimum and it coincided with (in climate science terms, "caused") what is known as the Little Ice Age. We are now entering a similar event, with a large risk we are also entering another ice age.
Option A: we lower CO2 emissions, all the western countries go bust, Islamists invade from all the world's hellholes and impose Sharia law, rape our daughters and then stone them to death for having sex outside of marraige (and yes it does happen - check out the world news).
Option B: we don't go bust, CO2 levels continue to rise and nothing goes wrong with the weather. Nobody has to die a horrible death.
"CO2 would have to be disappearing somewhere without trace"
This is quite naive. Adding CO2 in the atmosphere has almost no effect on global temperature because we are already at the 100% level. No more infrared can be absorbed by the atmosphere, no matter the amount of CO2 you add.
The key point is that the climate goes in a cycle. Far from having pushed the temperature to catastrophic levels, we are just following the natural cycle. If you look carefully at the graph, you will notice that every bust was preceded by a boom and we are right at the end of the latest boom.
In other words, prepare for cold weather.
An interesting idea and deserving of a patent if it meets the standard required, unlike most Apple patents reported here. I'm more concerned about the prior art. From the article, Apple is aware of several previous patents. As well, I would be asking Apple to provide a demonstration machine. If you can't do that, you don't deserve a patent.
"The worst thing that can happen to Assange is that he's finally dragged off to Sweden"
Actually that isn't the worst thing that can happen to him. The worst is that he gets asked 2 questions, to which I expect he will answer no. Then he will be shipped off to that lovely caribean holiday site, Guantanomo Bay.
"If he had faced the charges initially " ... I don't think Assange has actually been charged with anything, has he? All the Swedish wanted was to ask him a few questions. I would have picked up the phone, but apparently they do things the old fashioned way in Sweden. Most people seem to think that it is just a political stunt to limit his damage to the US. Oh, and to introduce him to his new accommodation in Guantanamo bay via that old favourite, black rendition.
The official complaints are that he didn't use a condom. In what rational country is that a crime?
The problem isn't really that we need price controls. It is that we don't have real competition. If I want to buy a piece of software x, I go to my local computer store and get told it costs the RRP. If I go to their competion next door, I am given the same price. Why? Because the Australian distributor tells them the RRP.
There is no incentive to discount on the RRP because everybody charges it. Also, sometimes they can't because they are acting as agents instead of retailers.
However if parallel importing was allowed, I could go to the Internet and look up the price in other countries and choose the cheapest. Let's face it, world-wide shipping costs are a small fraction of what they used to be. That would create real competition that would force the Australian retailers to start to compete. It would also put back-pressure on the Australian distributor to reduce the wholesale price (and hence the RRP).
But it will never happen because parallel importing is banned by the copyright act, specifically to prevent this from happening.