ISWYDT
It imitates what they do, improves on it, and incorporates it
Felt a new identi-TLA was needed, didja? (I think I'l stick with E3, at least for now.)
524 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2012
This being America, I presume
Yeah no, don’t presume. It’s not only presumptuous, but foolish: What “this” is it that you think is America? The global Internet we’re all reading (and commenting on) this upon, or this British computing news site specifically?
(Sheesh... Yet another Yank suffering from “There Is Only America” syndrome.)
> Still that's better than the acrobat windows which can decide their location is miles off the screen and which makes it hard to move them back to somewhere I can see.
Alt-Tab to focus the offscreen window, Alt-Spacebar to get its system menu, X to maximize it. From there, if you click the "restore" (overlapping windows, upper-right corner, next to the red X to close) titlebar icon, it scoots back offscreen -- but if you grab the title bar while maximized and move it a bit down, it goes to non-maximized with the titlebar where you released it.
At least that usually works for me, with the apps that do that shit. Dunno if it works for all apps, but HTH!
>> Also I think it would be helpful if the taskbar on each screen showed just the applications that are open on that screen instead of showing all of them.
At least on Windows 10 I have to explicitly set it to show all apps on all taskbars[*].
If the taskbar's behaviour is something that bothers you... Have you ever looked into Taskbar Settings?
---
[*]: Which is how I prefer it; I hate only seeing some of my open programs, never mind which screen I'm looking at. But then, my taskbars are vertical, autohiding, show labels, and are rather wide. Like, you know, sensible people would want them to behave.
If you've set your taskbar to autohide like a normal person who wants to, you know, see their desktop... Then that button wouldn't be visible / clickable until you move your mouse to the taskbar.
And why faff about with the mouse in the first place -- is there something wrong with the Windows or D keys on your keyboard?
This article is about Windows. I don't want Teams to be part of Windows installation.
Yeah no, who would. But you're missing two things:
1) Some people might.
2) And whether it comes with Windows or not, it's just an example: The OP (or someone else) might want to do stuff like that with any application, and what they're lamenting is the removal of the facilities for doing that from the OS.
Sadly it is in current Win11...
Yet another reason to avoid W11 like the plague... Easy enough at home, but at work, it's coming soon. Sigh... :-(
Your clipboard text switch is easy to implement into a keyboard shortcut.
Yeah, but that disregards the (rather obvious, IMO) fact that stuff you want to copy from Teams isn't just firstname-lastname pairs; it's the text the people behind those names sent, too. What's that script going to do, "every switch of pair around words"?
> 9. A fun UI. The modern simple designs are boring and no longer new.
Or even a *boring* UI. Like in NT4. Computers and operating systems are supposed to just work; if we want to have fun, we install some fun application.
> 11. A replacement for Fax and Scan.
E-mail? ;-)
> Catamarans and trimarans are usually positively buoyant, ie. their overall density is less than the water they float in as they have no keel.
All boats and ships are usually positively buoyant, regardless of how many hulls they have and whether they have a separate keel or not.
If they weren't positively buoyant they wouldn't be boats or ships, but submarines.
It's the *Free Software Foundation* - free software replacements is what the initiative intends to develop, not proprietary "FOSS".
The 'F' in “FOSS” is the first F in “FSF”: The acronym stands for “Free and Open Source Software”. It's an umbrella term that encompasses both “Free Software” and “Open Source Software”.
(Which, yes, proves that the introduction of the term “Open Source Software” as “just a synonym for Free Software that will be easier to sell to corporations” was either a deliberate subterfuge or, at least in retrospect, misguided: People obviously don't see them as synonyms any more.)
Different definitions of “nerd”. Sure, most any other OS is more in tune with one (perhaps the dominant) definition of the term, but for the not-quite-overlapping set of people defined by “the nerd _aesthetic”_ -- i.e, “aesthetics nerds” -- the primary association is definitely Macs.
I did. Used a MacBook Pro (two, actually; the latter with the horrible “strip” in stead of the function keys) at work 2014-18. It became _tolerable_ -- certainly not better than Windows, but perhaps not _much_ worse either -- after a couple months of getting used to it.
Except for the “walled garden” and “our way or the highway” aspects, which at that time were even worse than Windows. (TBF, that's comparing to W7, which was what I'd used prior to that. Microsoft may have caught up on that nowadays.)
to research aircraft of WW2:
1) IHYLS should be alright, I hope?
2) About that Mosquito: If it was in German hands, couldn't that glass dome have been shattered (or damaged) when they captured it, and therefore replaced with a German-style one? (Or if they just preferred them that way?)
A minute with a non-conductive, thin, sharp, implement removed all the fluff and now it works fine!...an ordinary wooden match or toothpick. Or, if even that is too thick (many toothpicks and all matches are, I think), whittle it a little thinner with a sharp knife.
Of course I found this out the day after I'd bought a new phone to replace the “dead” one.