Re: It's a stupid idea
Anybody running "apps" from untrusted sources probably deserve whatever mess they end up in.
320 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Jun 2012
In the old days, if I wanted to block ads on, say, my television, I'd have to design/build some form of gizmo and then physically solder it onto my set somehow, or take the easier option of using the Off button.
These days I have complete control over everything entering/leaving the network in my house. I can put all manner of hardware and software between my consumer devices and the wider world.
The impression I get of government IT is that they tend to buy large software suites from the "usual" vendors and then spend more money employing the "usual" consultancies trying to get the things integrated and working. As the vendors and consultancies are there to make money rather than improve society, it's not surprising things go awry.
I think it was more of a "meh". Not sure why anyone would want to use SQL Server when there are a plethora of open source GPL'd database engines available.
It would only have caused "excitement" if Microsoft said they were going to licence it under GPL version 3.
There I was thinking a document is just a bunch of text with maybe some images and/or tables.
If you have "complex" documents, I'd revisit the use case for having that data and business logic in an Office document. If you choose to continue with Office then be prepared for the awful breakage when a subsequent version completely breaks your documents.