Re: More Reg bashing, yawn.
I totally agree. There has been absolute radio silence from The Reg on all the other instances of an insurer indicating an unwillingness to insure a particular make and model of a production vehicle.
325 publicly visible posts • joined 6 May 2012
I don’t know why they haven’t already mandated that all telemetry data surrounding an incident be instantly and securely made available to authorities. Isn’t it obvious that the manufacturers will massage or remove any inconvenient data?
No doubt they will shout “commercially sensitive!” but there are ways to handle that.
Chelyabinsk injured only 1000 people out of over 3 million.
Compare
18 vs 11 m diameter (a fifth of the volume)
42,690 mph vs 3,100 mph
Even if both were the same mass, the Chelyabinsk meteor would have had 200 times more kinetic energy than 2024 PT5.
So yes, I think it’s pretty accurate to call it harmless.
My “favourite” is the iterative error messages, with no information that covers all requirements. (Thankfully I haven’t seen it for a while.)
1st attempt: too short
2nd attempt: you need both lower- and uppercase letters
3rd attempt: you need a special character
4th attempt ‘/‘ is not permitted.
Etc etc
The icing on the cake is when you have to do a puzzle captcha puzzle for each iteration
I understood it as sensors on the ground measuring disturbances in the signal coming from Starlink satellites. However stealth an aircraft is, EM signals won’t pass through it (yet!) and apparently this can be detected.
Maybe it is a bit like detecting planets passing across their stars? That’s always seemed a bit black-magicky to me, measuring such small differences.
I’m not sure… facts are not absolute but are at best assumed (believed?) to be true according to our understanding of the world.
So I tend to see myself as a strong/devoted/zealous believer of the scientific method. I find this state of mind makes it easy to curtail interactions with people of esoteric views such as flat-earthers and homeopathists (I’ve given up trying to convince them that they’re wrong): „you believe in homeopathy? Well I believe in science. Let‘s talk about films“
You have totally misunderstood the premise of that book, unless the title is totally misleading (I haven’t read it).
It is saying that facts have a half-life, which is something I had already heard about. The half-life that was mentioned back then was 50 years.
This says nothing about which proportion of today’s accepted facts are true. To take the example of 50 years, it means that half of all facts that were accepted as such 50 years ago will have turned out to be incorrect.
What I don’t understand, and which in German fan-zones seems to be getting more common, is lobbing your beer somewhere as soon as your team scores.
Even from a purely selfish point of view it makes no sense to me:
- the beer is very expensive
- the Pfand is very expensive
- there are often big queues to buy a new beer and you have to miss some of the match
So why oh why?!
I’m no mechanical genius but I can’t really think of anything that I could, or would want to, potentially fix on the road providing I had a spanner or screwdriver. And even less so with an electric motor, which really does get rid of most of the mechanical gubbins that can be tinkered with.
Most faults will be sensors which even if you could repair would likely require the error flag to be reset. There’s no spare tyre, and changing lightbulbs on the go is a non starter, Maybe changing a fuse but you could probably get away with a key or coin to access the panel (if you even carry fuses - who does?).
Which just leaves duct tape and cable ties which will fix broken bodywork and leaks. But everyone carries those all the time anyway, right?