Re: Grifters gonna grift
People aren’t buying these things. They are showing their fielty. And getting some freebie tat as a “thank you”
521 publicly visible posts • joined 6 May 2012
To me it seems pretty churlish to shoot down ideas about establishing a presence on the moon, which by definition they must be somewhat far fetched. And please, “doesn’t have ownership rights”? Maybe you want to expand on that bald assertion, starting with explaining who has, and who hasn’t, “ownership rights” on the moon. And the basis for that claim.
Too simplistic. I think the scientific jury is out on whether fake CSAM increases or decreases the risk to real children.
The two extremes of thought are
1. Fake CASM can be created without harming children and is therefore an acceptable way for paedophiles to feed their desires without resorting to real CASM.
2. Fake CSAM harms children because it encourages/enables paedophiles to progress to real CSAM.
But the law is clear, all CSAM is illegal.
It would take me “a few minutes” to _begin_ looking up how to configure my router to block certain addresses.
Another few minutes to dig out the router admin password.
Figuring out the IP addresses of all my network devices will cost me a multiple of “a few minutes”. Or am I blocking/permitting wrt MAC addresses? More multiples.
Do I white list or black list?. Which is better? How much am I willing to make life awkward for ourselves and future visitors who want our WiFi? More multiples.
And that’s just the beginning. Now I need to troubleshoot everything that doesn’t work. And you can be goddam sure that some problems will crop up that are entirely unrelated to messing around with the router, because that is inevitable in my house.
So no, “a few minutes” is merely long enough to trash a functioning home network, nothing more.
My point was that a sophisticated time system, working as it does by “composing a special statistical average of many clocks”, ought to know if something is wrong and ought to be taking itself offline.
Maybe I just needed a headline along the lines of “atomic clock drift caused by blackout did not get flagged by the reams of systems that are in place to interpret the outputs of these very big and very complex physical systems”. Not so catchy, I’ll grant you.
I’d like to be clarify that my comment referred only to the fact that the abbreviation you used for your son’s degree unfortunately also corresponds to bovine excrement (my instantaneous interpretation). Maybe I should have used the joke icon instead.
And tbf I’m still unclear if you meant business studies (my second interpretation) or, now I think about it, batchelor of science (more commonly shortened to BSc in the UK).
No offence intended. Definitely not against practitioners of CAD. And some of my best parents are into EE (I hope you were referring to electrical engineering!).
Peace unto all.
You call it comparing apples and oranges but it really isn’t.
The first one is a simple question of, if I drive to a drop zone and skydive am I more likely to be injured/killed from the journey or from the skydive? Statistically that can be answered (e.g for the avg distance driven, the avg nr skydives per visit etc).
For the second, your stat only selectively compares events in which there is injury/death. You’d need to also consider the numbers and types of safe outcomes. In any case, back then the implied context was a non-emergency decision for a prospective skydiver: “do you want to jump out or land with the plane’.
Truth lies and statistics…. I certainly don’t claim that the stats I heard were in any way rigourous. And much statistical fun can be had with apparently simple questions, e.g. whether carrying a parachute (or a bomb!) on a flight increases or decreases your chances of survival. What is 1000% sure is that your passage through security will not be smooth :)