Re: Win 8 icons
I think your Rose Tinted Glasses forget MS BOB.
(PS, funny enough, I honestly thought my memories as a child of MS BOB were from a dream till I saw the Wiki page. That or the Mandela effect. ;) ).
2754 posts • joined 23 Mar 2012
SpaceXs Dragon capsule can still do a land landing. But NASA are not too happy (and perhaps SpaceX want to fast track?) with propulsive landings. Plus due to this no landing legs are attached.
I do wonder if it cold land on land with the chutes alone, or with a little help from it's Dracos.
I have the exact same model the rental companies have. I could even add a speedo and indicators and wing mirror to make it a legal "motorbike". I think the only thing I cannot add are motorbike validated tires, as it's rims are too small.
Strange only they are allowed to put their bike on the road, but if I buy one of theirs, it's suddenly illegal. :(
"Users will be permitted to ride electric scooters on roads, tracks and public cycle lanes, but will be required to hold a full or provisional driver's licence and wear a helmet. It will remain illegal for individuals to drive privately owned scooters on public highways."
But why? I've been trying to figure this out. I needed transport (especially during this lockdown) without a car, and the only thing I could fit in my available space at the time, was an electric folding scooter. Professionally made, with lights, with speed limits, with (as far as you can make on a standing scooter) "push assist" with a helmet, and with a (car licence as it's not classed as a motorcycle, but closer to an e-bike) licence and being as safe and courteous as possible to everyone.
It got me to where I needed to get and back to the car.
It's as slow as a bicycle. It's as balanced as anything else I've ridden. If I needed a MOT and bike licence I'd happily get one, but I would ask "why not *also* ask bicycles for this too?" as what actual difference does electric motors make to feet? What safety difference does it make if its me peddling vs my mate peddling and me resting, vs electric vs petrol? I mean, if we were talking about wind, then that would be dangerous!
But that's the thing what is magic about foot pedals!?!?! And what would it take to register it as a motorbike? I mean, would they not just laugh at me if I did the required mods and turned up with a helmet to ask for a certificate and VIN number? (Don't tempt me, I'm pedantic like that, and I will do it!!! XD ).
If it's dangerous, then get other motorised vehicles off the road, or tell me how it needs to be modified to be safe. If it's safe, then stop making it illegal! (I in no was condone using it on pavements though, but neither should bicycles be on pavements!)
Because it was the phone with infinite data that lost service. ;)
I also have a backup, made the error of putting both on the same backhaul provider (different consumer facing ISPs). Was waiting to switch one or the other to a different provider, and see it's not worth waiting till the contract ends, and don't want to leave the one that has been reliable (the system going down for them also is more a one off and I want to keep the number, so will wait to transfer that one).
Yes. But purely giving people a required discount for failure to provide the service (service outages are obviously, failure to provide service) is more reasonable both parties.
Currently it seems to only be a contract to protect the ISP, as if it goes down for days/weeks, what you gonna do?
Me? I'm about to cancel my ISP, as it's gone down just as I need to do a zoom conference. Phone calls tomorrows I think, or just cancelling and sending a letter to them, financial ombudsman (the ISP will no doubt bill me for the cancellation for their inability to provide service) and trading standards/consumer protection authorities.
Also, for Hawkins radiation to even work, requires certain temperatures around the black hole, and most if not all SMBHs are already too large to start evaporating unless the background radiation gets cooler (or some other mechanism allows it to be cooler near them?).
If they were spatially separated by lightspeed separation then we could not see them.
If we can see them, then they are moving slower than the speed of light. Thus particles can reach us.
If they are separated, are you suggesting *all* parts of matter and antimatter are also separated in the universe perfectly? How would they avoid colliding at some point in the past or future to light up the sky?
Correct, they have not. We currently don't have enough antimatter to test such a thing, and even if we did, isolating it from other systems (passing bin lorries are enough to affect some detectors!) is going to be difficult to get a reading. Possibly possible, but it will take a long time.
Antimatter is basically the opposite "spin" (it's called a spin, but it's not the direction the particle rotates in, it's like a "left/right" style designator). Other than that, all things seem identical. But IIRC there are some results that show antimatter may decay slightly differently than matter does.
Black holes would like to say hello. Black hole mergers specifically. Oh, and their little brothers (sisters?) neutron star mergers.
Add to that most things falling into supermassive black holes at galaxies centers, and we can periodically state that CERN is not powerful enough to cause any lasting damage from the device existing alone.
Pointing it at the wrong place (person?), incorrectly powering/cooling/setting it on fire or using it wrongly would cause harm. This is true for anything, from air to rocks. I guess the particle accelerator is by nature more dangerous than a commenter using their home PC to post on this forum... but it's more the risk of those using it. Right!?
Also, you could spend billions making the best ham sandwich. But there is limited return for investment there, so a £2.99p sandwich is good enough.
As long as health research is still done, it's not necessarily true that spending billions more on it speeds up the natural time limits and size constraints on testing/experimentation/discovery. Where as the actual size of a detector determines what you can detect!
Huh? No. The current mix of the universe is not 50/50. But any new production of matter seems to be produced 50/50. Currently existing matter is so much near 100% that antimatter is a tiny fraction of what is out there.
We *can* detect antimatter. You seem to have misunderstood a lot. Go back and read it, check videos showing diagrams, and take it step by step before jumping off the cliff without checking where the bridges are. ;)
Because nothing is truly an island. Those antimatter galaxies would be on fire on their edges, and so would matter galaxies like our own. As interstellar gas, solar winds and things sent off from black holes (though those kind of energy jets from black holes are mainly photons and not matter) would set things ablaze pretty early in the universe, and we'd still be seeing the glow for billions of years!
Yeah, no idea what that "it's stil 50/50" post is blathering about. It's not 50/50 for the universal matter is (rounding error) 1% matter. Thus for some reason, less antimatter, or more matter was around. Currently, it seems anti matter/matter is produced 50/50.
However current experiments suggest there may be a tiny amount of decay more for antimatter than there is for matter via some CP violation of antimatter, allowing the change (IIRC).
The post on 50/50 matter/antimatter would end up with a universe with nothing in it, not one with a little more matter left over, as we have now.
Also these are training sets, nothing to stop them asking them to retrain on a public training set and redo the competition. That would be more fair. Completely kicking them out, when if the above comments are true, they were asking and being open to FB, is very unfair an suspicious.
[Edit]Ah, reading below they did. So that seems more fair, and I don't think FB is in the wrong here. An unfortunate result, but a level playing field. The other dataset results are still an option for other uses, just not the competition.
Add to that wireless charging and in screen cameras/finger print scanners and manufactures/designers are probably going to want to keep bigger screens.
I like bigger screens (reading/navigation/use case is easier), but also use it as a big screen. But I also understand about having a small device. What I don't understand, is people wanting a small device, that can tow like a big one. There are trade offs, and it's reality in accepting them.
I accept I'll need a case, big pockets and to be careful in one handed operation (no problem for me as the case works well) if I want a big screen. I don't complain that my likes have limitations in design.
So why complain that the smaller phone has less features, when it's physically smaller? Like complaining they don't make big cars anymore, then when someone points to one, saying "but there's no space/small engine/low towing capacity/not many manufactures make them anymore" etc. :P
I get downvoted for mentioning that there are smaller phone options because non-flagships are low specced, but then people say there are headphone jack in the non-flagships?
Guess I lose some, but neither can you lot have it both ways.
If you want the latest and greatest, well guess what, it takes up more space. If you want lower spec, then there are options. If you want a small Apple phone, well, go to Apple. I'd also want an Apple Macbook I can swap Ram or SSDs too, and that's kinda out of the question now. I'd not downvote someone for mentioning "options exist for computers" just because Apple don't provide options, yet loads of downvotes seem to be from people wanting Apples and Samsungs flagships to be 4 inch phones. :/
I love how other people complain that other things they don't want exist.
I'd totally agree with you if there was zero choice (SD card and Apple? Or Headhpone Jack and Samsung?). But here, you often do have smaller devices (Samsung and Apple both have smaller handsets, and I think most manufacturers do).
Your like the friends who when I go "I like to eat X" go "oh, that must be disgusting" because they don't like it. Like, I hate most cheeses, but when they eat em, I don't tell them how disgusting their cheese *must* be, because I don't eat it. :P
Or the websites.
"Internet" is a loaded word. I can be your local wifi used by everyone in the house. It could be the local phone/fibre lines and the local switch/cabs/routing. It could be the backbone and peering, software/purchased or hardware/physical limits. It could be the server/game/website you are connected to.
A LOT can affect it, but the article seems to apply "internet" to ISP. That generally has not slowed down, as people are using the internet throughout the day, not as much all at the same time (as they did anyhow at 6pm previously etc). With the exception of ISPs that always have had, and will have, trouble due to poor management.
AFAIK AMD is working on full encryption across the CPU. The problem is, that if the software has access at all, it's just a waiting game before you can decode the "key". As I don't think 256bit AES encryption is going ot be blazingly fast on the CPU for every bit execution. But some simple encryption in memory does mitigate it in part.
If you train an AI model on only perfect driving... your AI won't know what to do when it "sees" (it won't, as it's not trained on it, but it will get a feed from the cameras/lidar/sonar) an over turned truck.
"There is an over turned truck in front of you."
AI, blankly "OK, so I continue on into it?"
At least with the rocket science they have a scope/outline of all possible outcomes, even if unlikely, and try to cover all bases of failure modes. With self driving cars, I've yet to see anyone cover the basic failure modes, let alone an exhaustive one!
IS it worth the cost and time and effort to sort out? If not, just go for CMR.
If it's worth the effort, you can test, test and test again for this new type of drive behaviour (SMR that does not report as SMR and hopes you can trust it to do things right, and not do garbage collection at the worse time).
At least so far with SSDs they learnt their lesson, and most will be made to have decent garbage collection speeds and controllers that can cope with it (though I've had at least one SSD that died after 15 mins ever single time after a firmware level clearance of the entire drive, so good, it never worked!).
Sometimes you *can* do something and make new technology. But you need to ask if it's worth the hassle, and if there is a use case. Here SMR can be used in some types of NAS, and in others... it might chug.
Is this purely an autopilot error? In general these are not are high risk, as the pilots are suppose to check up on it's behaviour. A bit like if your cruise control goes too fast/slow, but still allows you to override/turn it off at any point. A problem, but not as bad as breaks failing.
I see absolutely no way this is going to go horribly wrong for buyers, and wonderfully well for FB and scammers. Nope. None at all. FB certainly will not deny and fault in their least effort attempt with lowest overheads and supply of a service while taking the highest cut, and are in no way emulating Ebay with even less work (is that possible?).
In tests water cooling is not "better" as such. It has a larger heat sink (the water compared to a copper fin or two), so harder to saturate. Air cooling is still the simplest. And I assume even the noise benefit is still from not saturating it as quickly, thus the fans don't ramp up as quickly. Unless you have more fans on the water cooler sink, in which case, it's more fans and a big copper heatsink would also do the same and similar dB noise.
Is it more flexible in positioning in cases? Does it allow for larger radiators? Yes. Is it "better"? Results may vary. ;)
Are you sure it's due to reference of race? And not just to remove ambiguity in spec sheets, reference material, and those who prefer "red/green" or "orange/purple" etc etc.
I mean, "allow/deny" is less arguments in the new open plan, coffee free, avocado painted, electric scooter cluttered "office" designing the latest buzz word laden "app" than having to chose the specific colour of eggshell blue for the accept button. :P
Is the bank using it international?
As for software, it often is, and colour (though sometimes international) is a local and social, traditional option for reference.
So it can cause confusion, or be a buzzword. Where as "allow list" and "deny list" are easier to translate and implement.
Also see time, clocks, calendars and just about anything human being way way more complex once you decide to try and program it! :D
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020