Re: The Birds
True, but on the plus side if you're hit by a dropped packet it's apparently good luck.
2158 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Mar 2012
You got a bunch of downvotes but you’re one of the few people here that get it.
Canada can get what they want by putting pressure on OVHC, which they will do on whichever way is most effective. The impact this has on OVH or France or anyone else is not their problem.
I don’t know what the short term answer is but the long term answer is use a different corporate structure.
Ah, nice to revisit that - I'd forgotten all the wacky theories at the time. I should note that the fine article you linked to doesn't say that exactly, it says that Russian fake news networks claimed the blackouts were "a consequence of the European sanctions against Russia" - the implication was that it was the lack of energy resiliance that caused it, not Russian action. Still bollocks, but a different slant.
That's an incredibly dumb comment.
Consider what you could do with 3 billion phone numbers and email address, 2 billion face images and a reverse image lookup. Want the private contact number for a government minister? Easy.
If you haven't the imagination to see how this could be useful, maybe just sit this conversation out.
I feel we're giving Gordon the benefit of the doubt with this one. I've also written documentation for our own product - on the one hand I know it backwards, on the other hand the documentation is intended for people that don't. It's easy to skate too quickly over content that needs expanding, and focus on bits that the engineer thinks matter but that the users don't.
There has never, ever been writer in the history of the world who wouldn't benefit from a good editor with a fresh set of eyes.
Forgive me if my irony meter breaks with this comment.
This whole thread started with a joke and has continued as one, with lots of earnest opinions on how things should be done. I have particularly enjoyed the "rewriting things should be stopped" angle from people using Linux - go talk to the BSD people in the mid-90s for a take on that one - and that issue with application design rather the language itself somehow indicate this whole thing is wrong footed.
The nearest thing to a sensible comment so far is "new code, new bugs". This is true. Any rewrite starts with one step back, it's what happens next bit that's the important bit.
For someone called Basic Reality, you’re sure not grasping it.
Heat. The massive, barely mentioned problem with this ridiculous notion is heat. We are literally boiling away billions of tonnes of water dissipating heat from data centres on earth, so how exactly are we going to do that in space? Black body radiation isn’t going to cut it.
Definitely not an expert but from what little I know, this actually sounds like a big deal. I understand there are plenty of hard problems with Fusion but the main one always seemed to be plasma confinement and control - this sounds like a big step forward. So a tip of the hat from me.
Very true, and very definitely not this case with this font.
Their demo page includes the sentence "Retro aesthetic meets modern clarity" - I had to re-read it because I didn't recognise the final "y" in the word "clarity". So I'm not sure it works as a font, but as a practical demonstration of irony it's magnificent.
As already documented in a well known study from the 1970s. The solution, clearly, is to ensure that only mustard sandwiches are delivered by drone.
> The new approach hides key Java concepts but does not remove them; they will have to be learned later.
Amen. For every recent Java release, most of the features seem to fall into to this category - "look, here's a shiny new syntax for an existing feature". To me, all I see is more syntax to learn to do the same thing. Yes, they've shaved a few lines off the main class, but they're just added to my cognitive load. It's completely the wrong direction to take (see also: "var", streams API, etc ad infinitum)
"There's More Than One Way To Do It" was the slogan for Perl. Anyone still codiing in Perl? No, I didn't think so.
Something stinks here.
I've been having a look through the dependencies on that library and all so far of them have less than 100 downloads. But over 200 of the dependencies are different packages with a vietnamese title "Một thư viện giúp bạn tính tổng của 2 số bất kỳ", which means a library that helps you calculate the sum of two numbers. Which is all it seems to do.
But there are hundreds of these, with hundreds more depending on them, all seemingly doing the same thing. They're on github too, eg https://github.com/setpass/sum-setpass, https://github.com/quocvangvien/quocvang
Based on some other packages by the same people, my guess: someone is gaming NPM dependencies to try and get packages installed, and somewhere in that massive dependency chain of hundreds and hundreds of packages is some malware, possibly crypto mining. Any budding researchers out there might have some fun with this.
"Determines if an object can be used like an Array"
Fucks sake people. That's not a package, that's a line of code. Or five lines, once you wrap it up for a packaging
If you are one of the 73 million people who downloaded it last week, you have no business driving a computer. Shame on you.
> Historians have always had to deal with this. An unreliable chronicler announces that a mythical King lost a war after tripping over a dog and every historian covering the war, the nation involved or the history of dog ownership repeats it. You'd be amazed how many urban myths make it into history text books.
A local mate has been attempting this for years - he has essentially invented a local legend, and has been shoe-horning it into letters to the paper and other local publications as often as possible. The goal is to get one of them indexed, then he can create the wikipedia page to point to it, then he can refer to it as the source. A quick google and I see he has finally succeeded - Google's AI has just earnestly told me of it's history, so now I guess it must be true.
Naturally I will not be giving away any more, but I'm going to have to buy him a beer when I see him for a job well done.
The nice bit about Y2K was we at least got to have a big NYE party. Maybe we need a UNIX Epochalypse party to focus the minds? Haven't done 3am in a while but I'm kind of tickled with the idea of a bunch of mates, plenty of beers, and massive 32 bit clock on the wall counting seconds in hexadecimal. Maybe just for fun I'll set all the lights to go off when it rolls over...
I've always been confused about this, maybe a data-center expert could clarify.
Obviously water is required for cooling, but surely it's presumably just then run off to a tank or something to cool and then recirculated? It's not just dumped into the drains, is it? Because it couldn't be economical to literally flush away 34 million liters of water a day just because it got warm going through a pipe. I have a server in a datacenter and I know they have cooling tanks, so I've presumed that's the industry norm...