No the priority is driven by three sets of objectives.
1. Corporate - largely based on maximising shareholder value. Board of Directors zone directing management..
2. Personal - maximising your paycheque and pension. Job satisfaction optional.
3. Safety.
Until you align 1 .and 2. with 3. then the first two (one?) dictate your priorities.
The only levers applicable are the metrics you put in place and incent people on. What you measure and rate people on is what they do (realistically you have to ensure those in 1. and 2. support 3.). The current case demonstrates that a failure to properly incent 3. will lead to a big hit on 1. Ultimately also affecting 2. for some of the management.
Too complex? Join me at the pub and wait for all of this to blow over - it's safer than getting on a 737 Max (well, probably not since they are all in the airport long-term parking lot).